From: Jeremy Rubin <:.

From: Jeremy Rubin <:. > To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: Re: mah jong NOT women dominated. Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 17:17:58 +0000 Games where no one wins are games for losers ;) @JeremyRubin On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Jeremy Rubin a- wrote: Well so maybe to generalize a hypothesis poetry observation, the types of games women "win" are ones without objective measures of winning. Games like this might be considered to be infinitely repeated games. This is similar to notions of credit as mentioned in Graeber's Debt First 5000 Years, where if the game terminates or is expected to the system fails. I guess Martin would know more. @JeremyRubin On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:59 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: motherhood game? card games, video games. hacking. all are games . same result. . poetry game maybe :) On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Jeremy Rubin c wrote: Would be an interesting to attempt to make an intellectually stimulating game where women outperform men. Unless women are inherently inferior to the maximally talented man at all tasks ;) I think there's some material which says women may be better endurance athletes (eg, long distance swimming) as an existential proof a women might be better than the best man. I'm reminded of the most-likely-not-Einstein quote: "Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid." In any case, its a fun experiment. If you fail to make such a game, you provide evidence of universal inferiority which would inform you (society) to not invest in gender diversity as much, if you make one then you'd probably learn more about how to get value out of female employees. aleremyRubin On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:00 PM, jeffrey E. [email protected]> wrote: music compostion no food no. musci conductors no. go champs no. bridge no. On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jeremy Rubin c wrote: I guess the other question is if not mahjong, are their any? aleremyRubin On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Jeremy Rubin c wrote: EFTA00629109 Looking at the number one is not enough — look at http://w.vw.mahjongnews.cornien/tournaments/mcr- toumaments/3905-inieju-island-for-fourth-worid-mcr-mahjong-championship the number 2 was female. From what I heard from locals in china, which was an anecdote and not fact, women were better players. So one would have to consider the skill level at all strata in many circles. @Jerern312.ubin On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:56 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: https:Uen.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_world championships in mind_sports its too easy to throw out bad facts . to bolster closely held desirable results rather than acknowledge differences. please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note EFTA00629110 The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00629111