Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00643130DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Noam Chomsky

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00643130
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Noam Chomsky To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Re: Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:04:20 +0000 Depends what thoughts are. If they are statements, questions, promises,..., then surely concepts come before thoughts because they are a prerequisite for thoughts (not conversely). From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 6:55 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: im not sure conveying thoughts i think concepts might come first. two things. vs one thing On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Noam Chomsky k wrote: If I understand you correctly, it brings up some very intriguing questions: is language a system for conveying thoughts (mostly internally, to oneself, sometimes externally to others), thoughts that are created by some other systems of mind? Or is it a system that actually constructs the thoughts. If so, then mostly unconsciously and beyond the possibility of introspection. In that latter interpretation, there would be "no sense before language" — except insofar as there is thinking of other kinds, which does not involve language. That seems to me at least to be rather plausible, though how to investigate the matters doesn't seem clear. As far as I can see, the only aspects of language that could be "reflex" are acquisition and processing of input, which do seem essentially reflexive — like other kinds of growth and immediate perception. NOam From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 4:07 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: instead of a sense making module , is it possible that language is that module. ? no sense before language. ? reflex only? please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00643130 please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00643131

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreflexive

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.