From: Peter Mandelson

From: Peter Mandelson To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 21:25:20 +0000 I have scanned quickly as am in middle of writing something. Good start. Apart from being lawyered throughout, it does not need more detail just coherence, order, the building of a case against a. the lawyers who have scammed you; b. the women who colluded with them; c. authorities who have been lazy and worse; d. the media who have exploited the story for their own needs. It does not need emotion or hyperbole. You are doing it as much to protect your friends as yourself. It should be brought to its best state by you — you will need to re-write and improve a good few times more to get it right — and then possibly worked on by a trusted/paid writer/journalist. This is absolutely key to your future, more important than anything else you are doing. You have to get it right. What is a john in this context ? From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 21:51:23 +0100 To: Peter Mandelson BT more detail needed? The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00654467