Case File
efta-efta00655970DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: Martin Weinberg
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00655970
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Martin Weinberg
To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation®gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Weinberg
Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:38:00 +0000
PS If USAtty declines to make argument, no reason for Roy not to try it - just that J Marra/Cassell could/would
counter that its a matter between USAO and Jane Doe untiUunless JE intervenes which I continue to believe has
not been and is not in your overall interest
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
ell
This Electronic Message contains
information from the Law Office of
Martin G. Weinberg, P.C.,
and may be privileged. The
information is intended for the
use of the addressee only. If you
are not the addressee, please note
that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or use of the
contents of this message is
prohibited.
- - On Sat, 8/6/11, Martin Weinberg <
From: Martin Weinberg <
>
Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
> wrote:
EFTA00655970
To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Martin Weinberg" <1
Date: Saturday, August 6, 2011, 11:11 AM
I will talk with Roy re 3771 case issues before his Fri argument.
The tension is that its the attys who have sought to intervene - not you. It will be demanding to get the Judge
to listen to a new argument that there is no jurisdiction & that, consequently,the entire CVRA Dec case is
moot since the girls lack standing due to their not being fed victims in the first place if it comes from your
attys seeking limited intervention to challenge the girls rights to discovery of what should be protected by a
combination of work product/plea & settlement confidentiality policies.
This argument is best made by the USAtty. Whether he will is another issue. I am recommending Roy speak
to Lee at start of week. The argument actually may give the USAO added leverage to negotiate a settlement
which would be great.
Separately, I need you to authorize payment of the 8-1 invoice. It includes a carryover from multiple past
months. I normally work off retainers. Thanks
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02116
cell
This Electronic Message contains
information from the Law Office of
Martin G. Weinberg, P.C.,
and may be privileged. The
information is intended for the
use of the addressee only. If you
are not the addressee, please note
that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or use of the
contents of this message is
prohibited.
EFTA00655971
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: "Martin Weinberg"
1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation®gmail.com>
1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
07/29/2011 14:05 FAX 5616845816
9p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: '
4p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01687128
0p
Court UnsealedJul 15, 2019
Letter Motion
Letter Motion, USA v. Epstein, No. 1:19-cr-00490-1 (S.D.N.Y. Jul 15, 2019)
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.