Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00655970DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Martin Weinberg

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00655970
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Martin Weinberg To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation®gmail.com> Cc: Martin Weinberg Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:38:00 +0000 PS If USAtty declines to make argument, no reason for Roy not to try it - just that J Marra/Cassell could/would counter that its a matter between USAO and Jane Doe untiUunless JE intervenes which I continue to believe has not been and is not in your overall interest Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 ell This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. - - On Sat, 8/6/11, Martin Weinberg < From: Martin Weinberg < > Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE > wrote: EFTA00655970 To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]> Cc: "Martin Weinberg" <1 Date: Saturday, August 6, 2011, 11:11 AM I will talk with Roy re 3771 case issues before his Fri argument. The tension is that its the attys who have sought to intervene - not you. It will be demanding to get the Judge to listen to a new argument that there is no jurisdiction & that, consequently,the entire CVRA Dec case is moot since the girls lack standing due to their not being fed victims in the first place if it comes from your attys seeking limited intervention to challenge the girls rights to discovery of what should be protected by a combination of work product/plea & settlement confidentiality policies. This argument is best made by the USAtty. Whether he will is another issue. I am recommending Roy speak to Lee at start of week. The argument actually may give the USAO added leverage to negotiate a settlement which would be great. Separately, I need you to authorize payment of the 8-1 invoice. It includes a carryover from multiple past months. I normally work off retainers. Thanks Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 cell This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. EFTA00655971

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.