Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00657650DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Steven Sinofsky

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00657650
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Steven Sinofsky To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Form 8-K Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:08:48 +0000 Importance: Normal I don't know. They are referencing the program that you accelerate vest at age 55. I don't have the written version of that. They have to file I thought. Maybe there is a loophole where they don't have to file the whole thing and this suffices. I would be precluded from filing the whole thing by signing. But I could release the working drafts because there was no nda. ---- Reply message From: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]> To: "Steven Sinofsky" c Subject: Form 8-K Date: Fri, Jun 14, 2013 3:03 PM they will only file the 8k after you sign. first what were the temrs of the "qulaified retirement,"that they reference, and didn;t it have an acceleration provision? 2. im trying to decide whether after they file, whether you could file the entire agreement under a required provision, anyway , nothhing to do today, On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Steven Sinofsky < wrote: I was a 144 officer. All the stock stuff was filed by ms on my behalf. This just seems like a way to make the agreement look good for them or at least different than the one I signed. I don't see the need for two steps. Once I sign they can file an 8k with the actual contract. Since I haven't signed or seen a final there is no 8k. ---- Reply message --- From: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]> To: "Steven Sinofsky" • Cc: "Jay Lefkowitz" Subject: Form 8-K Date: Fri, Jun 14, 2013 2:52 PM nothing to agree to or not agree, is there a final draft of the agreement? ? Steve " in the past have you ever filed sec doc. 144. form 4 etc PROT0 On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Steven Sinofsky < > wrote: I do not really appreciate this. It feels like a game. They summarized the contract in much more favorable terms to them. This causes two opportunities for pr problems. This is a game. Do not agree yet. We need to think. J attachment to follow. Reply message ---- From: "Lefkowitz, Jay P." To: "Steven Sinofsky" c Subject: Form 8-K Date: Fri, Jun 14, 2013 2:32 PM FYI Begin forwarded message: From: "Brad Smith (LCA)" Date: June 14, 2013, 2:29:09 PM EDT To: "Lefkowitz, Jay P." Subject: Form 8-K Hi Jay, I've attached the current draft of the Form 8-K that Microsoft will need to file after execution of the agreement with Steven. We'll take a final look at this before locking all of the words, but I don't expect it to change in any significant way. The full agreement will be filed later with the company's 10-K, but it will not be filed as an attachment to the 8-K. I'll give you a call on Monday when I'm back in the office, so we can talk about timing of this. I think it will make sense to have the parties both sign the agreement next week, but it would be good to compare notes on the specifics. Brad PROT1 I I IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of (1) avoiding tax-related penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved PROT2

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreference
Wire Refreferencing

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.