Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00667100DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Vincenzo Iozzo

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00667100
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Vincenzo Iozzo To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: Re: DNC docs Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:08:52 +0000 Yeah the secrecy part was the big concern. The probabilistic part a little less so, like normally people have clear metrics eg "if we could analyze satellite pictures with less latency, we could make X more trades per second" or something. Now they could be making losing trades which is where the complication comes in :) but yeah.. Sent from my Iphone On Jun 16, 2016, at 06:05, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: I dont know of any that woudl open their books. also most are probablistic , so an increase wouldnt be easily determinative On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Vincenzo lozzo wrote: Btw do you know anybody well that does quantitative trading/hft? I have been thinking of trying a new type of consulting where the formula is roughly "I audit your code, if I find anything that can be optimized I get 10% cut of the extra revenue you make thanks to the optimization" Technically it's not restricted to hedge funds (eg: this would work equally well for Google and the likes) but the connection between optimized code and increased revenue is probably clearer for hedge funds, plus they have a lot of customized code so higher chances that they messed up something Sent from my Iphone On Jun 15, 2016, at 18:22, jeffrey E. [email protected]> wrote: fun, but the only important ones would be hillarys secret On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Vincenzo Iozzo > wrote: https://guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/06/15/dnc/ Sent from my Iphone please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of EFTA00667100 WE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00667101

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

URLhttps://guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/06/15/dnc

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.