Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00692304DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "Martin Weinberg"

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00692304
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Martin Weinberg" To: "Jeffrey" <[email protected]> Cc: Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:14:32 +0000 I am not at all sure that SORNA includes travel notification. So far its prohibitions have only been extended to registration and updating. Needs to be checked. Feds enacted reg to incentivize states to follow. Real issue is whether states will and if so whether there is discretion built in. (If states do not adopt they cannot violate you). If there is no such discretion I like the argument it is penalty (and your penalties cannot expand after you are sentenced). I will look into all this over weekend. MGW ---- - Original Message From: Jeffrey. To: Martin Weinberg Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 9:01 AM Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Yes but a prenotification ??? What other govt reg has prenotification and penalty for violating , of a right ( travel , speech ) I understand post . I can be violated for traveling without having given proper per notice??? Sony for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Jun 22, 2012, at 2:33 PM, "Martin Weinberg" < wrote: have they been added to the state laws in any/all of the states in which you are registered? if its a penalty its ex post facto and cannot enhance your sentence. if its part of tracking a registrant it would not be a penalty. the first practical issue is whether the state implementation of this added guideline includes discretion such as was being considered in VI -- Original Message — From: Jeffrey Epstein To: Alan M. Dershowitz ; Martin Weinberg Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 8:16 AM as the sex registrationguidlines now want 21 days notive before traveling out of the country. and they have maintaned that registration is not a penalty on an adminsitravtive reuglation to register. how does it operate if one wants to leave tomoorrow. and cannot meet the 21 day requiemmet.. it can't act as a restriction on travel. and still claim not to be a righs violation or at minimum a penalty?? The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by EFTA00692304 destroy e- oytmailoomr by m mailotnoaj atio nedevaalcl pn® iesggail.c , and thereof, om EFTA00692305

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.