J. MICHAEL BURMAN. RAN

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 9

Reference

efta-efta00724315

Pages

Persons

Integrity

No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

J. MICHAEL BURMAN. RAN GREGORY W. COLEMAN. PA ROBERT D. CRITTON. JR., PA' BERNARD A. LEBEDEKER MARK T. LUTTIER. PA MICHAEL J. PIKE MICHAEL L. SCHEVE DEAN T. XENICK DAVID A. YAREMA Inomon WARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TlUAL ueorna 2ADMITT1D TO PRACTICE IN FLORIDA AND COLOMDO BY HAND DELIVERY Judge Donald Hafele Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Attn: Denise Vanvooren BURMAN, CRITTON LUTTIERSLCOLEMAN.LLP YOUR TRUSTED ADVOCATES A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP June 23, 2010 Re: B.B. v. Jeffrey Epstein, et al. Case No. 502008CA037319XXXXMB AB ADELOVI J. BENAVENTE PARALEGAL/INVESTIGATOR JESSICA CADWELL BOBBIE M. MCKENNA ASHLIE STOKEN-BARING BETTY STOKES PARALEGALS RITA FL BUDKYK Of COUNSEL EDWARD M. RICCI or COUNSEL Dear Judge Hafele: Enclosed please find proposed Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice in the above-styled matter. Plaintiff's counsel has reviewed and agreed with the language of the proposed order. If the Order meets with your approval, please have your judicial assistant forward copies of the signed order to all counsel in the stamped self-addressed envelope provided. RDC/clz Enclosures Cc: Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Cordially Robe D. Critton, Jr. • PHONE: • FAX: WWW.BCLCLAW.COM EFTA00724315 IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA B.B.. CASE NO. 502008CA037319XXXXMB AB Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. 1 ORDER ADOPTING STIPULATION AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, and in accordance with the parties' Stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The above-styled action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. 3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement, if necessary. DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm Beach, Florida this day of June, 2010. Donald Hafele Circuit Judge Copies furnished: ESQ and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., THEODORE J. LEOPOLD. ESQ. AND SPENCER T. KUVIN, ESQ., Leopold- KuvIn, P.A., JACK A. LDBER ER, iiiiirbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.. EFTA00724316 IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA B.B., CASE NO. 502008CA037319XXXXMB AB Plaintiff, v. and Defendants. STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff, B.B., and Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (collectively, Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.420(a)(1) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice, each party to bear their own fees and costs. The Parties further stipulate that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Parties' settlement. Dated this 234frday of June, 2010 Respectfully submitted, BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP Attorneys for Jeffrey Epst; in LEOPOLD-KUWM P.A. Attorneys f By: By: ROBERT D. C ON, JR., ESQ. SPE Florida Bar No 224162 Phone Fax EFTA00724317 Page 2 Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by electronic mail (e-mail) and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 2q day of June, 2010. Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. A Weiss, P.A. Leopold-Kuvin. P Fax: Counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Fax: Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein BURMAN CRITT0N LUTTIER COLEMAN, LLP Fax By: Robe D. Critton, Jr. Flor a Bar #224162 Michael J. Pike Florida Bar #617296 (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) EFTA00724318

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.bclclaw.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Flietit0A ()MO D.C. ELECT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, [REDACTED - Survivor], and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants. NOTICE OF REMOVAL July 18, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORF CLERK D.S. DIST. CT. S.O. OF FLA. • MIAMI In accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1446, and 1332(a)(1), the defendants, Jeffrey Epstein, hereby remove this action' from Palm Beach County Circuit Court to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, and respectfully state as follows: Introduction Six months ago, this plaintiff filed virtually the identical lawsuit in this Court. See Jane Doe #1 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-cv-80069-KAM (S.D. Fla. filed Doe v. Epstein et at, Case No. 50 2008 CA 006596 XXXX MB (Fla. 15th Cir. Ct. filed Mar. 6, 2008). Lewis "Fein 1059 044.444vEleuf Skim 340, E0coRuT Go

100p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 1 of 100 nsor & Associates RepornnE sad Transcripoon. Inc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 75 Q. Because Mr. Epstein never came to your dad's house, correct? A. Correct. Q. And no one who worked for Mr. Epstein ever did something to your dad's tires, did they? MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Lack of foundation, predicate. Don't guess. BY MR. TEIN: Q. It's not true that Mr. Epstein almost killed your father, is it? MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Asked and answered, lack of foundation, predicate. BY MR. TEIN: Q. You can answer. A. No. Q. Now you told the police that you didn't know who was in the car with you and IIIIIII on the day you went to Epstein's house, didn't you? A. Yes. Q. And that was a lie, wasn't it? A. It's the truth. Q. You told the police that there was someone in the car next to you and you specifically said y

100p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 1 of 116 From ne Page 47/51 Date. 5/29/2008 12 09 L' • Si esta responder u la demanda per su cueille, al mismo tiempo en que prise= su respucsta ante il tribunal, debeni ustett envier por comme o entregar une copia de su rapueste a la persona denominada abaju corne "PlaintifUPlaintiffs Attorney" (Demandante o Abogado del Demandante). "De acuerdo con el Acto 6 Decreto de los Ameriennsos con Impedirnentos, inhabilitados, persona.; en necesidad del servicio special para panicipar en este procedimiento deberin, dcntm de un 'derme rezonable, antes de cualquier proœdimicnto, ponerse en contacto con is officine Administratutiva dc la Cone, 205 North Dixie Highway, oficina 52500, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, Téléfono (561) 355-2431, 1-800-955-8771 (I'DD) 6 1-800-955-8770 (V), Via Floride Relay Service". pv1FOR'FANT Des poursuites judiciaires ont etc entreprises contre vous. Vous avez 20 jours ormsecu

116p

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02729648

53p

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02728716

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2008 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80804-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1, Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE [DE 121 Defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby responds to the plaintiff Jane Doe's motion to preserve evidence, as follows: I. The Certificate of Compliance annexed to the plaintiffs motion states that plaintiff's "counsel conferred with counsel for [Mr. Epstein] . . . and [Epstein's] counsel advised that [Epstein] opposelS] this motion." DE 12 at 2 (emphasis added). That certification is inaccurate. 2. On August 21, 2008, counsel for the plaintiff called Kathryn Meyers, Esq. of the Lewis Tein law firm to elicit Epstein's position on this motion. Ms. Meyers responded that she would confer with Mr. Tein and call them back. Less than thirty minutes later, however, plain

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.