Case File
efta-efta00725714DOJ Data Set 9OtherUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00725714
Pages
5
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA-JOHNSON
JANE DOE NO. 5,
Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO. 5's SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL
ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES
Plaintiff, JANE DOE NO. 5, by and through their undersigned counsel, and
pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 33, hereby responds to Defendant,
JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff as follows:
General Obioctions
1.
Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to the extent that the
Interrogatories call for the disclosure of information protected by the attorney-client
privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, or other applicable privilege or immunity,
whether created by statute or common law.
Plaintiff claims such privileges and
protections to the extent implicated by each Interrogatory, and excludes privileged and
protected information from any responses to Defendant's discovery. Any disclosure is
inadvertent and is not intended to waive those privileges or protections, which are
specifically reserved.
2.
Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to the extent that same are
vague, ambiguous, incomprehensible and/or overly broad.
EFTA00725714
Doe No. 5 v. Epstein
Page 2
3.
Plaintiff objects to Defendants' Interrogatories to the extent that the
Interrogatories seek to impose obligations beyond those imposed by applicable law and
the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure.
4.
The foregoing general objections are incorporated into each of the specific
objections and responses that follow. The stating of a specific objection or response
shall not be construed as a waiver of Plaintiffs general objections. Plaintiff reserves the
right to supplement these responses and to make further objections. Plaintiffs
responses shall neither waive nor prejudice any objections that Plaintiff may later
assert.
5.
Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement or amend its Responses and
Objections to Defendant's Discovery as and if additional information becomes available.
Subject to and without waiving any of the foregoing objections, which Plaintiff
hereby incorporates into each Interrogatory set forth below, Plaintiff responds to
Defendant's Interrogatories as follows:
PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL
ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES
11.
List the names and business addresses of each physician (including psychiatrist,
psychologist, etc.) or medical provider (including chiropractors) who has treated
or examined you, and each medical facility where you have received any
treatment or examination for the injuries for which you seek damages in this
case; and state as to each the date of treatment or examination and the injury or
condition for which you were examined or treated.
Answer:
Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory as vague, overly broad, unduly burdensome,
premature, and calling for an expert opinion. Subject to said objections, Plaintiff
states:
EFTA00725715
Doe No. 5 v. Epstein
Page 3
William G. Wood
Finney Psychotherapy
420 N. Center Dr., #141
Norfolk, VA 23502
2008-2009
Medication Management
Rebecca Thomas Psy.D. & Associates
838 Granby St.
Ste. 200
Norfolk, VA 23510
2008
Counseling
12.
List the names and business addresses of all other physicians, medical facilities,
rehab facilities (drug, alcohol or psychiatric) or other health care providers
including psychiatrist, psychologist, mental health counselor and chiropractors by
whom or at which you have been examined or treated in the past 10 years; and
state as to each the dates of examination or treatment and the condition or injury
for which you were examined or treated.
Answer:
Douglas Leonard Cassidy, ■.
1170 N. Military Hwy
Norfolk, VA 23502
2007-2008
Eye doctor
Bayview Medical Center
7924 Chesapeake Blvd.
Norfolk, VA 23518
2007
General family practice
March
, 2010
Respectfully submitted:
MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ P.A.
18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218
EFTA00725716
Doe No. 5 v. Epstein
Page 4
Tel: 305-931-2200
Fax:,-305-931-0877
Florida Bar No. 947245
Adam D. Horowitz
Florida Bar No. 376980
Jessica D. Arbour
EFTA00725717
Doe No. 5 v. Epstein
Page 5
Certificate of Service
WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of tye foregoing has been sent via U.S.
Mail and facsimile to the following addressees this
day of March, 2010.
Robert D. Critton, Jr, Esq.
Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman
303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone
Fax
Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, M.
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
Jeffrey Epstein
EFTA00725718
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Phone
305-931-0877Phone
305-931-2200Phone
401-5012Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01682184
186p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01370863
1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown
Medical Record/Clinical Encounter: DOJ-OGR-00026334
This clinical encounter document from the Bureau of Prisons details a medical evaluation of Jeffrey Epstein on July 12, 2019. It covers his medical history, current complaints, and treatment, including discussions around his triglyceride levels, sleep apnea, and back pain. The document was generated by the treating physician at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York.
1p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00014087
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02367961
1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01977826
2p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.