Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00727603DOJ Data Set 9Other

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00727603
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 — MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendants. FILED by JUL 0 8 2010 STEVEN M. LARILLORE ERIC U.S. Mt CT. . Of FLA. • W.P.B. Joint Stipulation Of Mootness and Withdrawal Of Plaintiffs Emergency Motion For Hearing Requesting That The Court Find Epstein In Civil Contempt Of The Court's Two Orders Forbidding Harassment And Indirect Contact, For Appropriate Sanctions, And Additional Remedies Including Referral For Criminal Contempt Plaintiff, JANE DOE and Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), hereby file their Joint Stipulation of Mootness and Withdrawal Of Plaintiffs Emergency Motion for Hearing Finding That Epstein Is In Civil Contempt of the Court's Two Orders Forbidding Harassment And Indirect Contact, For Appropriate Sanctions, And Additional Remedies Including Referral for Criminal Contempt (Des 194 and 195)(the "Motion for Contempt"), and each state: 1. On July 2, 2010, Plaintiff filed the Motion for Contempt and an associated Motion to file same under seal. (DEs 194 and 195) 2. The parties have resolved the above lawsuit. 3. Plaintiff's counsel has been advised that the investigator was hired by Defense Counsel and was supervised by Defense Counsel. 4. Putting aside certain fact disputes between the Plaintiff, Defendant and their respective investigators as to what occurred, Plaintiff's counsel agrees to withdraw the Motion as 1 EFTA00727603 it is now moot. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant requests that the Court enter and order finding the above Motion for Contempt as moot and withdrawn, and grant any additional relief the Court deems just and proper. Local Rule 7.1 Statement Pursuant to the above rule, the undersigned counsel and Plaintiff's counsel have conferred and have agreed to same. Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Robert I. itt.n Jr. ROBERT a CRITTON, JR., Florida Bar No. 224162 Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following service list in the manner specified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF on this n day of July, 2010: Brad Edwards, Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman. P Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hoc Vice 2 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss. P.A. Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00727604 o-counse or Plaintiff (Co-Counsel for Defendant Jefrey Epstein) 3 EFTA00727605

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.