Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00727954DOJ Data Set 9Other

July 27, 2010

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00727954
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
July 27, 2010 VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL & FACSIMILE TO (505) 827-3399 Regina Chacon Department of Public Safety P.O. Box 1628 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504-1628 Re: Jeffrey E. Epstein: New Mexico SORNA registration Dear Ms. Chacon: Thank you for speaking with me by phone on July 26, 2010. The person I was describing to you is my client Jeffrey Epstein, d/o/b January 20, 1953. Although Mr. Epstein currently resides in the Virgin Islands, he is also the sole beneficiary of a trust which owns a vacation home at 49 Zorro Ranch Road, Stanley, New Mexico, 87056 in Santa Fe County. Mr. Epstein has pleaded guilty to two offenses and was sentenced on June 30, 2008 in the 15'h Judicial Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida in criminal case numbers 06-CF-9454 and 08-CF-9381. I have enclosed the Indictment, Information and Sentences imposed on that date. As you will see, the second offense is Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution in violation of Florida Statute 796.03. That charge was based on conduct occurring between August 1, 2004 and October 9, 2005 with a person, A.D., who turned 18 on October 10, 2005 ( in other words, the conduct as alleged occurred when A.D. was 16 and 17). He was released from the last sentence to be served under the two Sentencing Judgements, called "community control" under Florida law, on July 21, 2010. This offense required, as a matter of Florida state law, sex offender registration. Before Mr. Epstein concluded his sentence, he registered as a sex offender in Florida. Because his primary residence is in the Virgin Islands, he has also registered in that jurisdiction. My reading of the NM Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) provisions of NMSA 1978, § 29-11A-4, leads me to believe that my client has not committed an offense which would require him to register in New Mexico under state law. However, I have enclosed the pleadings in the Florida case so that you can give me your independent opinion on this as well. I do not read Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution as falling within one of the enumerated SORNA qualifying offenses under NMSA 1978, § 29-11A-3(E) (defining 'sex offense' for purposes of the New Mexico SORNA provisions). Nonetheless, in an abundance of caution, Mr. EFTA00727954 Page 2 Letter to Regina Chacon re: Jeffrey Epstein July 27, 2010 Epstein will be registering with New Mexico local authorities to satisfy any federal SORNA reporting requirements. I agree with your reading of the NM SORNA statutes that Mr. Epstein's reporting requirements are not triggered until he actually arrives here in New Mexico. The state statute provides for ten days to appear in person at the Sheriff's Office after arrival. For that reason, upon his next visit to the New Mexico vacation home, Mr. Epstein will be appearing at the Santa Fe County Sheriff's Office to register to comply with federal SORNA requirements. I appreciate your offer of assistance in alerting the Santa Fe County Sheriff's Office regarding Mr. Epstein's need to register under Federal SORNA Law, assuming that he need not register under the NM's SORNA provisions. I also understand that your reading of the State SORNA statutes does not require Mr. Epstein to reappear at the Sheriff's Office in person each time he visits the Stanley vacation house. However, at your suggestion, I intend to have Mr. Epstein call the Santa Fe Sheriffs whenever he is in New Mexico to alert them of his presence at the Stanley home. In any case, I await your review of the enclosed materials and assessment of whether Mr. Epstein's conviction in Florida gives rise to a state SORNA reporting requirement under New Mexico law. Thank you for your willingness to review the material and give me your considered opinion. Please call if you have any questions, need more information, or if I have misunderstood our discussions in any way. I look forward to hearing from you. In case you are calling after business hours, my cell is 505 250 5616. Sincerely, PETER SCHOENBURG Attorney At Law PS/cls Enclosures: Indictment returned July 19, 2006 Information filed June 26, 2008 EFTA00727955 Page 3 Letter to Regina Chacon re: Jeffrey Epstein July 27, 2010 Sentence Imposed on Indictment June 30, 2008 Sentence Imposed on Information June 30, 2008 cc (with enclosures): Rosemary McCourt, Esq. New Mexico Public Safety Department P.O. Box 1628 Santa Fe, NM 87504-1628 EFTA00727956

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone(505) 827-3399
Phone504-1628
Phone505 250 5616

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

21p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

ROTHSTEIN, DONATELLI, HUGHES, DAHLSTROM, SCHOENBURG & BIENVENU, LLP

4p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Letter: 25-1

The letter, dated August 19, 2010, from the New Mexico Department of Public Safety, informs Jeffery E. Epstein that he is not required to register as a sex offender in New Mexico under state law for his 2008 Florida conviction, but may be required to register under federal law.

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

425 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 3d SERIES

306 425 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 3d SERIES t In short, the issue now before the Court has arisen only because Donziger unjustifi- ably has refused to comply with his discov- ery obligations. Had he done so — i.e., had he produced responsive documents as to which there was no colorable claim of priv- ilege, submitted a privilege log as to re- sponsive documents as to which there was such a colorable claim, and submitted any disputes for judicial resolution - there would be no need to examine his ESI. But he has not. And the Court thus must take appropriate action. His arguments to the contrary are meritless. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the Court has entered the protocol for imaging and forensic examination of Donziger's elec- tronic devices and media. SO ORDERED. the six months between being served with the document requests and the Court's eventual ruling, on October I8, 2018, that Donziger had waived any applicable privi- lege. Third, Donziger disregards the

25p
Court UnsealedJul 18, 2019

Epstein-Berman-bail 7.18.19

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 1 of 33 USDCSDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRO NI CALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --.......,,.,---~=~..-.- DATE FILED:---L.,._._~~----- ---------------------------------------------------------------x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 19 CR. 490 (RMB) Government, DECISION & ORDER REMANDING DEFENDANT - against JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------------x A. Backgr

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.