The truthfulness of M.'s allegations and testimon in

The truthfulness of M.'s allegations and testimon in s Civil Action have been severely compromised by the need to seek a dollar payout to maintain massive fraud. Because false settlements of tens of millions of dollars in cases relating to EPSTEIN were misrepresented to a in this ponzi scheme, and the attorneys in the Civil Actions needed to create a fiction that included extraordinary damages. However, the truth behind the Civil Actions could never support such extraordinary damages. Unethical and illegal measures were, therefore, undertaken to create an entirely inflated value of their_ claims against EPSTEIN. Though she held herself out as a "victim" of Epstein she admitted to having returned over and over again to his after her claim of abuse, 1 —s ., She has now admitted, under oath, to being a (see Depo Transcri • t She testified (see Depo Transcri • t Transcript makin. L. (see Depo Transcript since the a e of and' (see Depo admitted her activity with other than to • n ma be more than in admitted under oath to ,Lfsee-Depe-Trensc-r-ipt includin: (see Depo Transcript Under the circumstances, a claim for damages against EPSTEIN, one of ' during that same period, would be so jncredible and certainly not likely produce the extraordinary settlements promised to ' In la therefore before she was represented by and etheeettepneys-a-M, gave sworn taped recorded testimony to the agents of the FBI speaking of EPSTEIN in-only in exceptionally glowing terms and directly contradicting all of the-her central allegations on which 's Civil Action against Epstein is now based. However, once in the hands of and when faced with the prospect of a settlement or verdict which himself, has brazenly claimed numerous times to EPSTEIN's attorneys to be worth tens of millions of dollars, M.'s story changed dramatically. For example, in her sworn statement to the FBI, M. was insistent that " (See page of Sworn FBI Statement). At the conclusion of she stated: " (See pages of Sworn FBI-Statement). In fact, spoke so highly of EPSTEIN and her interactions with him that the US Attorninformed a federal court i hat the US Attorney could not consider M. a victim. (See excerpt from Declaration - page') EFTA00731652 Yet, b the date on which M. began her deposition in the Civil Action, .'s new and very different tale about purported sexual misconduct under the supposed influence of EPSTEIN had been thoroughly practiced and her indoctrination into the scam was complete. In her deposition in the Civil Action, .. declared that: In her sworn testimony before she met , .. was emphatic that her interactions with Epstein involved no inappropriate sexual touching in any way. In fact, it was exactly the opposite: • However, within a month after brought .. within the fold at the end of El. filed the Civil Action alleging, amon other thin s, sexuallii, ii of by Epstein. B the time the Complaint was after joined t allegations against EPSTEIN in .'s time i complaint became even more salacious. In paragraph.of.' Complaint,.. alleges among other things, that: EFTA00731653 In her sworn statement, nor to being represented by M. told investigators tha i the individual who first brou: ht to EPSTEIN's mansion, told ' (see_age line f FBI Sworn Statement). Nevertheless, after tutelage, M. told a very different story: Before meetin testified to the FBI : ." see page., lines of Sworn FBI Statement). Yet, after she met when questioned about her Before was underage: represented M., she also testified that EPSTEIN never knew she Yet, once again, after came into the picture, M.'s new storyline became: also hired an attorney and began litigation Her being an employee o notwithstanding, EFTA00731654 Before also advised federal investigators that EPSTEIN never knew that any of the girls rought to EPSTEIN's mansion were underage: However, to bolster her claims in-the-Civil-Actienr.. made drastically different allegations, once and appeared on the scene. Instead of the 18 or 19 or 20 year old women that told federal investigators she brought to EPSTEIN's mansion,She now testified that Before her representation by she had been goin : to E i stein's mansion, (see page lines • f Sworn FBI Statement counsel from and others at doin : so this scri a and period of ove of her de osition, stating: ." (see Depo Transcrip i I However, was not content to leave it that, and in the middle of her deposition, sought to expand the claimed period of association with EPSTEIN, stating that she last saw EPSTEIN, when M. was asked how long stated "I saw him for a good year." Yet, after having the benefit of claimed to have been t at the be innin see Depo Transcript =n1 tried to stick to M. was also emphatic before that there were absolutely no drugs involved-iwthe-Epstein-easei EFTA00731655 Hewevecr PeaiiZifet-hat-she-weukl-ne anatien-as-te-why-she-Fetuceeel-te EPS-TRIN-tale-and-ineluileil-outlandish-elahns-efisteug-abuse-in-her-elepositie testimenyt Yetruniler-persistentleestiening-fFem-EPST-E4NLs-6410firsehi4MA4lepesitieilreven •. had to admit, conci3tcnt with her prcviouo tc3timony to the FBI, that EPSTEIN liad-ne-invelvernent-vAlatse elaimed-thuger-akehel-usagei A final example of how M.'s representation by M and involvement in the scam compromised 's testimony in the Civil Action can be found in I. .'s characterization of others brought to the Epstein mansion. In her sworn statement prior to involvement, M. described those she brought to EPSTEIN's mansion as eager for the opportunity and content with their experiences: EFTA00731656 However, after she became client and the Civil Actions were brow ht to M, M. flipped her statements 180 degrees. In her deposition in her dollar Civil Action, not surprisingly, M. re-characterized the experiences of those she brought: EFTA00731657