From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: ' Subject: Re: Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 18:44:26 +0000 the risk , is that gordon tony, or someone else gets traction suggesting that you are revealing confidences for your own short term interests., On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 2:32 PM, < > wrote: I am VERY selective about conversations. And I certainly cdn't publish after taking a position with jpm. I need to be careful. But I am not an anodyne person. That's why I get things done. Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 14:26:58 -0400 To: Subject: Re: I understand. conversations were had that others at the time considered private. On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 2:18 PM, < > wrote: No, waiting is not the answer. You are misreading the tn/s. It is not a missile attack. Everyone comes out fine in the end. Tony. Cherie. Gordon. Even Jack Straw. And the intro will make clear the purpose and balance of it. But I have had a thirty year career in politics. I have things to say about it, and the future. It is not salacious or scandalous. It is serious politics and commentary about organisations and how people interact. It also needs to be readable ! Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 14:07:12 -0400 To: Subject: Re: I will always give you my best advice. At the level at which you want to /capable of playing, it serves no purpose. except short term cash flow needs. IT will be seen as a tabloid tell all. cherie spoke to me on the phone, in her living room , tony was -- blank over cheries carelessness. tony said of gordon , it was really tony that said. if you have to publish , first make everyone look good. not flawed. Your next partners want to be sure. of the same treatment, alternatively maybe it best if you wait to publish and respond to tb's , alistairs and gordons books in case they trash you May 16, 2010 at 1:53 PM, < > wrote: PROT0 I don't think jpm would bother reading it. In the US, memoirs are totally bland. In UK, such blandness wouldn't be published. Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 13:40:09 -0400 To: Subject: Re: I am on your team.. that being said, as currently written the chances of a jpm positon would be zero On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:17 PM, < > wrote: Most people think if I hadn't been there, GB would have lost all our seats, not just 100 ! Cannot check quotes. They wd never agree.. Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device From: Jeffrey Epstein [email protected]> Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 13:08:22 -0400 To: PETER MANDELSON Subject: re-read.. choices.you might have a disclaimer that you ran by the quotes of tony cherie and gordon . for their pre approval -- if not will they retaliate with their own private quotes? it needs your own thought processes, your dilemas both political and moral. I think you want to be sensitive to the fact , that it reads as if Gordon brings you back for your communicatoin skills. stragetic thinking and political insight and then the outcome is The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. PROT1 return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and PROT2 return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and PROT3