Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00737765DOJ Data Set 9Other

DS9 Document EFTA00737765

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00737765
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Sane Weinberg" <=1.1M>, "Kim Homan" Subject: Attorney client privilege Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:15:21 +0000 Importance: Normal To recap Sorna requires notice re internatl travel for more than 7 My current beliefs are as follows on this single issue: Ny told kim they would impose no addl notification req (but see caveat for internet). We can work with ny contact on other issues tomorrow Fla - open issue is extent of itinerary - no in person req Fed - notification requirements do not exceed state req for this issue re who and how to provide notice - will followup tomorrow NM - issue of whether home requires reg if no intent to reside 30 days a year - advise we hire nm atty to seek opinion from their registry VI - need you give me contact info or rely on your VI atty At computer with all statutes in 1 hour to address other issues. Will also be verifying all of above Sent from my Verizon Wireless Blackberry EFTA00737765

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.