Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00764123DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: '•

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00764123
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: '• To: "Jeffrey Epstein" Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:14:09 +0000 Importance: Normal No obligation to tell you Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBeny From: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:57:51 -0500 To: Martin Weinberg< Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE no problem for each. shouldn't i have been contacted if alfredo was selling things that belonged to me. . there are no statistics of cc mod, as each case is different.. sometimes defendant ask though they have had mnay violations in the interim. or are on a monitor, or have not served enough time. in my case officers experience they have never objecte3d to a modification for anyone who has been in total compliance and has served 50%.. in fact the son of the investigator for the state attny just had his cc modified, there are violent felons that travel. Alfredo gave them my telephone book„ girls and celbrity numbers included and may have made statements. I decided to take the safe road and not travel this week. like running out the clock in a football game, just falling on the ball; On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Martin Weinberg < > wrote: we will need back up documentation on each prior trip in case the USAO raises them as issues: who was seen in each place in connection to litigation and why the review of dots, etc can only occur out of state need any prelim analysis of J billing if done need any data on regularity of reducing c/c as matter of state discretion as to others need to know just what Alfredo withheld, gave if its likely source of new allegations — Original Message -- From: Jeffrey Epstein To: Martin Weinberg • Roy Black Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 3:16AM I canceled my travel plans so as not to give anyone an excuse prior to the sloman meeting. I would like to know , who from their side will be there. ? We should be prepared for Marie to make new allegations , as the Alfredo article appeared in the paper yesterday. history tells me , not a coincidence. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited EFTA00764123 and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. ****************************************** ***************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. EFTA00764124

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48

13p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct

The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C

55p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Martin Weinberg" <

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case: 13-12923

28p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48

13p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

No. 13-12923

58p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.