From: David Gelernter

From: David Gelernter To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: velocity in time -- last word Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:57:07 +0000 Thnx. I should stick to softw. But as I can measure a vel > c if I pass a fast object going the other direction, I could measure an N-satisfying time-vel of > c. I'd thought backward time-motion was part of Feyn's famous QCD equations, but would have to travel way back to remember how. For Jews time is the comets tail--if you fly right, you leave a luminous wake of lit-up time; & Jews agree w/ Grks that you face baclward in time as you travel forward. On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> wrote: your physics needs a booster shot.. At the horizon of black holes , as one crosses the boundary, in fact time and space exchange behaviors.note there are both charged ,and non charged, spinning -non spinning bh's . wormholes allow faster than c travel. new experiments allow time travel to the past , however time is still only defined by the vibrations of cesium atoms. only as a parameter, not satisfying to Jews Our friend would argue that your thoughts travel faster, than c, predicting the near future, and obviously back in time, with the inevitable distortions upon re cohering. On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 7:41 AM, David Gelernter < > wrote: I've wondered about yr thougts on "time velocity," a reading of basic physics: as you approach c, you lose velocity (or speed) in time, reaching 0-in-time at c. 0 vel measured in space equals max attainable velocity in time (a constant related to c). The spectrum's endpoints are 0 in space & 0 in time. It's not a priori clear why you can't go faster than c, but is clear that you can't go slower (in time) than stopped. "Stopped" in space equals max-rate thundering through time. Nothing to do w/ physics, only philosophy. Whether or not we talk again, pls consider checking out my colleague Drew McDermott ). Schank will back me up. Drew is a brilliant AI man from a math background, too low-key to get the attn he deserves. (He & I have met wkly for years to argue machine consciousness, etc. Never yet agreed on anything.) Thanks-- David The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. EFTA00766454