Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00774276DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "Martin Weinberg"

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00774276
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Martin Weinberg" To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:25:01 +0000 Attachments: Crimes_and_Criminal_Procedure_-_18_USC_Section_2255_-_US_Code.pdf Putting aside NPA, and your arguably involuntary waivers, anyone can suit in federal court relying on claims of 2255 i.e. Congress has conferred civil jurisdiction on private parties claiming injury due to violations of the various predicates. The issue is whether they can meet their burdens of proof. Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. Original message from Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>: since the josephbug people are suing in federal court though there is no diversity.. and they have not brought up the npa, do we leave it , without a fight over jurisdiction which is dealt with in the npa, or raise it at somepointl EFTA00774276

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.