Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00795915DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 09-34791-R BR

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00795915
Pages
5
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 09-34791-R BR Doc 6441 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 5 ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on September 4, 2018. IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., CHAPTER II Debtor. Raymond B. Ray, Judge UNITED STATES BANKRUIPPeittatr iPtcY Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT Or FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov CASE NO. 09-34791-RBR AGREED MEDIATION CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the agreement of (1) Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), (2) Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), (3) Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White") and its insurer, (4) Intervenors Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. (collectively, "Intervenors"), and (5) Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos and Lehrman ("Farmer Jaffe") (collectively, the "Mediation Participants"), to participate in mediation subject to this Agreed Mediation Confidentiality Order. The Court, hereby ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows: I. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.720, Edwards, Epstein, and representatives from Fowler White and Farmer Jaffe who have the full authority to settle without EFTA00795915 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6441 Filed 09/04/18 Page 2 of 5 further consultation shall appear at the mediation in person. In addition, a representative of Fowler White's insurance carrier who has full authority to settle in an amount up to its policy limits without further consultation shall appear at the mediation in person. Finally, the Intervenors' counsel, who shall have full authority to settle the matter without further consultation, shall appear at the mediation by telephone. 2. The mediation proceeding is confidential and privileged as settlement negotiations. All statements made during the course of the mediation are privileged settlement discussions, are made without prejudice to any Mediation Participant's legal position and are not discoverable or admissible for any purpose in any legal or administrative proceeding whatsoever. 3. Florida law applies and governs the mediation including, but not limited to, Chapter 44, Florida Statutes, and the following specific confidentiality provisions: a. Florida Statute Section 44.403: 44.403 Mediation Confidentiality and Privilege Act; definitions.-As used in ss. 44.401-44.406 the term: (1) "Mediation communication" means an oral or written statement, or nonverbal conduct intended to make an assertion, by or to a mediation participant made during the course of a mediation, or prior to mediation if made in furtherance of a mediation. The commission of a crime during a mediation is not a mediation communication. (2) "Mediation participant" means a mediation party or a person who attends a mediation in person or by telephone, videoconference, or other electronic means. (3) "Mediation party" or "party" means a person participating directly, or through a designated representative, in a mediation and a person who: (a) Is a named party; (b) Is a real party in interest; or 2 EFTA00795916 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6441 Filed 09/04/18 Page 3 of 5 (c) Would be a named party or real party in interest if an action relating to the subject matter of the mediation were brought in a court of law. (4) "Mediator" means a neutral, impartial third person who facilitates the mediation process. The mediator's role is to reduce obstacles to communication, assist in identifying issues, explore alternatives, and otherwise facilitate voluntary agreements to resolve disputes, without prescribing what the resolution must be. (5) "Subsequent proceeding" means an adjudicative process that follows a mediation, including related discovery. b. Florida Statute Section 44.405(1) and (2): 44.405 Confidentiality; privilege; exceptions.— (1) Except as provided in this section, all mediation communications shall be confidential. A mediation participant shall not disclose a mediation communication to a person other than another mediation participant or a participant's counsel. A violation of this section may be remedied as provided by s. 44.406. If the mediation is court ordered, a violation of this section may also subject the mediation participant to sanctions by the court, including, but not limited to, costs, attorney's fees, and mediator's fees. (2) A mediation party has a privilege to refuse to testify and to prevent any other person from testifying in a subsequent proceeding regarding mediation communications. c. Florida Statute Section 44.406: 44.406 Confidentiality; civil remedies.— (1) Any mediation participant who knowingly and willfully discloses a mediation communication in violation of s. 44.405 shall, upon application by any party to a court of competent jurisdiction, be subject to remedies, including: (a) Equitable relief. (b) Compensatory damages. (c) Attorney's fees, mediator's fees, and costs incurred in the mediation proceeding. 3 EFTA00795917 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6441 Filed 09/04/18 Page 4 of 5 (d) Reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in the application for remedies under this section. (2) Notwithstanding any other law, an application for relief filed under this section may not be commenced later than 2 years after the date on which the party had a reasonable opportunity to discover the breach of confidentiality, but in no case more than 4 years after the date of the breach. (3) A mediation participant shall not be subject to a civil action under this section for lawful compliance with the provisions of s. 119.07. 4. The mediation is being conducted in both this action (In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791-RBR) and the State Court Action (Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards, 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMBAG), and will also address Epstein's potential claims against Fowler White. 5. For the limited purpose of the mediation, Epstein's 47 trial exhibits (the "47 e- mails") that Edwards claims are privileged and are currently under seal may be shown by Edwards' attorneys only to the mediator, Fowler White's attorneys and Fowler White's insurance carrier representative. Edwards' counsel shall bring Edwards' copy of the 47 e-mails to the mediation for this limited purpose. Edwards' counsel shall be present at all times during any review of the e-mails. No copies of the e-mails may be made and no notes may be taken regarding their content. 6. The use of the 47 e-mails during mediation will not constitute an additional argument of a waiver by Epstein of any privilege claimed by Edwards, Farmer Jaffe or the Intervenors. However, this does not vitiate or limit Epstein's existing waiver arguments, which are preserved pending further rulings of this Court. 4 EFTA00795918 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6441 Filed 09/04/18 Page 5 of 5 The Clerk shall provide copies to: Chad Pugatch, Esq. [Attorney Pugatch is directed to serve a conformed copy of this Order on all interested parties immediately upon receipt hereof and to file a certificate of service.] 2086255 5 EFTA00795919

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.flsb.uscourts.gov
SWIFT/BICDISTRICT
SWIFT/BICSOUTHERN

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Extensive RRA Contact List Linking Donald Trump's Attorney and Multiple Epstein‑Case Lawyers

The document provides a detailed roster of attorneys, paralegals, investigators, and staff associated with the RRA (presumably a law firm or litigation consortium) handling Jeffrey Epstein‑related mat Alan Garten is identified as "Donald Trump's attorney" within the RRA contact list. Multiple attorneys are listed as "Counsel for other Epstein Victims," indicating a broader litigatio The list inclu

2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Attorney alleges Rothstein used Epstein lawsuits to lure investors and links high‑profile associates to alleged child‑molestation scheme

The passage provides a potentially actionable lead that a law firm partner (Scott Rothstein) may have marketed litigation against Jeffrey Epstein to attract investors for his Ponzi scheme, and it name Attorney joined Rothstein’s firm in April 2009 and brought clients with lawsuits against Epstein. Allegations that Rothstein presented those lawsuits to investors to fund his Ponzi scheme. Claims tha

1p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bradley J. Edwards files renewed motion for summary judgment in Jeffrey Epstein civil case

The passage merely restates a routine procedural filing without revealing new evidence, financial flows, or connections to high‑level officials. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confirming Edwards seeks summary judgment, claiming no genuine issue of material fact. Alleges no evidence of fraud by Edwards against Epstein. References three alleged victims of Epstein linked to Edwards.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Counsel list filing for Jeffrey Epstein case (House Oversight document)

The document only provides attorney contact information and a case number for a filing related to Jeffrey Epstein. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑lev Case number: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Multiple law firms listed as counsel for Jeffrey Epstein Filing appears to be a notice of supplement in a court proceeding

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

BuzzFeed Review Finds Little Concrete Evidence Linking Bill Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein Misconduct

The document largely recaps existing reporting and court‑record reviews, noting that no hard evidence directly ties former President Bill Clinton to criminal activity by Jeffrey Epstein. It does highl Clinton appears on 13 documented flights on Epstein's private jet, often accompanied by Epstein aide Attorney Jack Scarola warned of “extortionate threats, power, wealth or political pressure” when a

10p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.