Case File
efta-efta00798007DOJ Data Set 9OtherIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00798007
Pages
6
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS and ST. JOHN
GREAT ST. JIM, LLC, and LSJE, LLC,
v.
PROSOLAR SYSTEMS, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
Defendant.
CIVIL NO. ST-2019-CV-057
COMPLAINT FOR
BREACH
OF
CONTRACT & FRAUD
ANSWER
Defendant, PROSOLAR SYSTEMS, LLC, by and through undersigned counsel,
answering Plaintiff's Complaint, as to each numbered paragraph thereof, alleges as
follows:
1.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant, they are specifically
denied.
2.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 2 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant, they are specifically
denied.
3.
Admitted.
4.
The Complaint speaks for itself. As to subject matter jurisdiction, Defendant
does not concede, and therefore denies this allegation.
5.
Denied.
6.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 6 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant they are specifically
denied.
EFTA00798007
Answer
Page 2
7.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 7 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant, they are specifically
denied.
8.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 8 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant, they are specifically
denied.
9.
Denied.
10.
Denied as stated.
11.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 11 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant, they are specifically
denied.
12.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 12 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant, they are specifically
denied.
13.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 13 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant, they are specifically
denied.
14.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 14 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant, they are specifically
denied.
15.
Admitted.
EFTA00798008
Answer
Page 3
16.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 16 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant, they are specifically
denied.
17.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 17 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant, they are specifically
denied.
18.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 18 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant, they are specifically
denied.
19.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 19 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant, they are specifically
denied.
20.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 20 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant, they are specifically
denied.
21.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 21 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant, they are specifically
denied.
22.
Defendant restates its previous responses.
23.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 23 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant, they are specifically
denied.
EFTA00798009
Answer
Page 4
24.
Denied.
25.
Denied.
26.
Denied.
27.
Defendant restates its previous responses.
28.
Denied as stated.
29.
Denied.
30.
Denied.
31.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 31 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant, they are specifically
denied.
32.
Defendant is without sufficient information or knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 32 of the Complaint. To the extent said
allegations allege or infer any negligence on the part of Defendant, they are specifically
denied.
33.
Denied.
34.
Denied as stated.
35.
Denied.
FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
Plaintiffs' injuries, if any, to the extent not solely attributable to Plaintiffs were the
result of acts or omissions of third parties over whom Defendant had no control.
SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
The Complaint fails to state a cause of action upon which relief may be granted.
EFTA00798010
Answer
Page 5
THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
The Complaint fails to state a cause of action for punitive damages.
FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
The Complaint fails to state a cause of action for fraud.
FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
The Court may lack subject matter jurisdiction.
SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
Plaintiffs' claims may be subject to the defense of improper venue and inconvenient
forum.
SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
Plaintiffs' claims are barred by the defense of lack of prior notice to Defendant of
any product defect.
EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
Plaintiffs' claims are barred by the defenses of estoppel, waiver and laches.
NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
Plaintiffs claims may be barred by their failure to mitigate their damages.
TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
Plaintiffs' injuries, if any, may have been caused by intervening and superseding
factors and events not the responsibility of this Defendant.
ELEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
Plaintiffs' claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations period.
TWELFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
Defendant specifically reserves the right to amend the Answer at any time prior to,
during or after trail to assert any affirmative defense that is established by the evidence.
EFTA00798011
Answer
Page 6
WHEREFORE, Defendant prays that judgment be entered dismissing the
Complaint with an award for such costs and attorneys' fees as are incurred in the defense
of this action.
Respectfully submitted,
Law Offices of Douglas L. Capdeville, P.C.
DATED: April 1 2019
AS L. CAPD
ILLE, ESQ.
Attorneys for Defendant
V.I. BAR #284
2107 Company St - Lot #4
P.O. Box 224191
St Croix USVI
TeF•
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this
day of April, 2019, I caused a true and correct
copy of the foregoing ANSWER to be served via U.S. mail, postage prepaid, upon
Christopher Allen Kroblin, Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin, PLLC, Royal Palms Professional
Building, 9053 Estate Thomas, Suite 101, St. Thomas, VI 00802.
EFTA00798012
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Case #
2019-CV-057Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.