Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00800051DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 448 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/14/2019 Page 1 of 3

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00800051
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 448 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/14/2019 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Respondent's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Confer with Petitioner's Regarding the Court's Opinion and Order of February 21, 2019. (DE 440.) Petitioners have filed a response. (DE 447.) On February 21, 2019, the Court granted Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and ordered the parties to inform the Court within 15 days as to how they wished to proceed on determining the issues of what remedy, if any, should be applied. (DE 435.) The next day, the Court clarified that it did not expect the parties to agree on a remedy but merely to confer on what submissions or proceedings are necessary for the Court to make a determination on a remedy. (DE 437.) The Government asks for an extension of time until June 6, 2019. The Government explains that the United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia has been recently assigned to this case and needs additional time to familiarize itself with the case and to confer with Petitioners regarding the remedy. Petitioners request that the extension be limited to no later than April 22, 2019 "to put a EFTA00800051 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 448 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/14/2019 Page 2 of 3 schedule in place." (DE 447 at I.) Petitioners also stated that "they believe the Government could announce its proposed remedy" on or about before May 10, 2019. (DE 447 at 2.) While the Court understands that Petitioner does not oppose granting the Government an extension of time, but simply wants to shorten the amount of time the Government is given for its response to the Court's Order, the Court does not understand what "schedule" Petitioner refers to or why it believes the Government could state a remedy on May 10, 2019. To be clear, the Court is simply asking the parties for input as to the mechanism to be followed in order for the Court to make a determination regarding an appropriate remedy. The Court does not expect the parties to state their positions on a remedy or argue the merits of their positions by the stated deadline. As stated in the Court's last order, if the parties do not agree on how to proceed to determine the appropriate remedy, they may file separate submissions. In any event, the Court will grant the Government a limited extension of time to provide its response which the Court will also extend to Petitioners. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Respondent's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Confer with Petitioner's Regarding the Court's Opinion and Order of February 21, 2019 (DE 440) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The panics shall file their responses to the Court's Order no later than May 10, 2019. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 13th day of March, 2019. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge EFTA00800052 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 448 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/14/2019 Page 3 of 3 EFTA00800053

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedJun 16, 2023

Deutsche Bank Epstein victim questionnaire

EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:22-cv-10018-JSR Document 90-2 Filed 06/16/23 Page 1 of 12 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case No. 1:22-CV-10018 (JSR) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ALL VICTIMS OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S SEX TRAFFICKING VENTURE DURING THE TIME PERIOD AUGUST 19, 2013 TO AUGUST 10, 2019 (THE “CLASS PERIOD”). IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR A SETTLEMENT PAYMENT, YOU (OR CLASS COUNSEL ON YOUR BEHALF) MUST TIMELY SUBMIT A TIER ONE FORM BY ___________, 20

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
Court UnsealedMar 17, 2016

Usg-Lavabit-Unsealed

U.S. District Court Eastern District of Virginia - (Alexandria) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-sw-00522-CMH-1 Case title: USA v. In Re: Information Associated Date Filed: 07/16/2013 Date Terminated: 03/24/2015 with [Redacted] Assigned to: District Judge Claude M. Hilton Appeals court case number: 13-4625 Defendant (1) In Re: Information Associated with [Redacted] TERMINATED: 03/24/2015 Pending Counts Disposition None Highest Offense Level (Opening) None Terminated Counts Disposition None

560p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00016005

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.