Case File
efta-efta00800170DOJ Data Set 9OtherCase 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 436 Entered on FLSD Do
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00800170
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 436 Entered on FLSD Do
Case: 19-10036
Date FRadf R/22/2019
R
Obgc-DigYo
t 3 D.C.
David J. Smith
Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEA"
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Feb 22, 2019
ANGELA E NOBLE
CLERK U.S. DIST.. CT.
S. D. OF FLA. - NIIANII
ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING
56 Forsyth Street. N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
February 22, 2019
Angela Emilia Noble
Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. U.S. Courthouse
400 North Miami Avenue, Room 11-3
Miami, FL 33128
Appeal Number: 19-10036-H
Case Style: R. Johnson v. USA
District Court Docket No: 9:08-cv-80736-KAM
For rules and firms visit
www.eal I .uscourts.eov
The enclosed copy of this Court's Order of Dismissal is issued as the mandate of this court. Sse
Ilth Cir. R. 41-4. Counsel and pro se parties are advised that pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 27-2, "a
motion to reconsider, vacate, or modify an order must be filed within 21 days of the entry of
such order. No additional time shall be allowed for mailing."
Sincerely,
DAVID J. SMITH, Clerk of Court
Reply to: Gerald B. Frost, H
Phone #: (404) 335-6182
Enclosure(s)
DIS-4 Multi-purpose dismissal letter
EFTA00800170
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 436 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2019 Page 2 of 3
Case: 19-10036
Date Riled 9p/22/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-10036-H
JANE DOE,
Petitioner,
R. WAYNE JOHNSON,
Interested Party-Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant R. Wayne
Johnson—who is not a party to the underlying litigation and did not move to intervene—does not
have standing to appeal from the district court's order denying his motion for production of
documents. See Marino v. Ortiz, 484 U.S. 301, 304 (1988) ("The rule that only parties to a
lawsuit, or those that properly become parties, may appeal an adverse judgment, is well
settled."). Johnson may obtain copies of the docket and public documents from the Clerk of
Court for afras the district court explained.
EFTA00800171
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 436 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2019 Page 3 of 3
Case: 19-10036
Date Fatdf 9/22/2019
All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No motion for reconsideration may be Sled
unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. IL 27-2 and all other
applicable rules.
2
EFTA00800172
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Case #
9:08-CV-80736-KAMPhone
(404) 335-6182Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.