Case File
efta-efta00801838DOJ Data Set 9OtherEXHIBIT A
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00801838
Pages
30
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
EXHIBIT A
5:02 PM, Clerk, Ranh Distr., Cowl of Appeal
EXCERPT FROM HEARING
REGARDING
MOTION TO STRIKE PRIVILEGED
DOCUMENTS
EFTA00801838
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN
AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually;
BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually,
Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
DATE TAKEN:
Thursday, March 8th, 2018
TIME:
10:07 a.m. - 12:08 p.m.
PLACE
205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10D
West Palm Beach, Florida
BEFORE:
Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge
This cause came on to be heard at the time and
place aforesaid, when and where the following
proceedings were reported by:
Sonja D. Hall
Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc.
1665 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1001
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICE, INC.
(561)471-2995
EFTA00801839
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant:
LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A.
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
By KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE
By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE
For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff:
SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART &
SHIPLEY, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE
By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQUIRE
By KAREN TERRY, ESQUIRE
For Non-Parties III., Illi & Jane Doe
HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C.
10 West Broadway, Suite 400
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
By PAUL G. CASSELL, ESQUIRE
For Jeffrey Epstein:
ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A.
250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
By JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICE, INC.
(561)471-2995
EFTA00801840
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
3
Miss Rockenbach or Miss Campbell did. That's not
4
the issue. You've done your job.
5
MR. LINK: I understand. Your Honor, may I
6
have one minute to confer with appellate counsel to
7
make sure there's nothing I need to do to preserve
8
this?
9
THE COURT: Absolutely. Let's just take a
10
brief recess.
11
(Thereupon, a short recess was taken.)
12
13
THE COURT: All right. Thank you again.
14
Please have a seat. Welcome back.
15
MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, I want to hopefully
16
tie up a few loose ends on the matter that has just
17
been ruled on.
18
Am I correct in understanding that the
19
defendant is prohibited from making any use of the
20
724 late-disclosed exhibits?
21
THE COURT: Yes.
22
MR. SCAROLA: Next, sir, we would request the
23
defendant be required to relinquish possession of
24
all copies of the privileged documents to the Court
25
under seal. They have expressed some concern
Page 70
EFTA00801841
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
60
1
stating that we have asked them to destroy them.
2
We want them turned over to the Court under seal.
3
They should no longer have possession of those
4
until such time as somebody rules that they are
5
entitled to have possession.
6
And I want to make one brief comment about
7
that, if I could can.
8
Your Honor knows very well that Fowler White
9
is a very large law firm that keeps meticulous time
10
records with regard to the services that they
11
render. And the concept that it is impossible to
12
reconstruct through those time records what was
13
received, when it was received, when it was
14
reviewed, what happened with it, who was informed
15
of what was happening with it quite frankly is
16
absolutely inconceivable to me; that a law firm of
17
that size, keeping records the way it did, cannot
18
reconstruct what went on with regard to this
19
information.
20
THE COURT: And that's a good point. What I
21
was going to point out earlier and I failed to do
Page 71
EFTA00801842
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
22
that, and I appreciate the reminder, is that I
23
would have expected certainly in deference to the
24
fact that Mr. Epstein was a client of Fowler White
25
that someone from Fowler White would have had the
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
61
1
ability to weigh in somehow as to these critical
2
issues.
3
Perhaps I'm being a bit naive when I say that
4
having served Mr. Epstein in their capacity as
5
counsel, it's my respectful belief that they owed
6
an obligation to Mr. Epstein, if not this Court, to
7
explain how and why they had access and kept these
8
records in their possession in light of that court
9
order and in light of this ongoing litigation. And
10
as a matter of respect to Mr. Epstein and his
11
ongoing legal team, to have made some type of
12
affirmative steps to have dealt with this issue
13
head on because of the apparent implications of
14
same.
15
So I again want to make clear that I'm finding
16
absolutely no fault with Mr. Link, Miss Rockenbach,
17
Miss Campbell or anyone else from the Link and
Page 72
EFTA00801843
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
18
Rockenbach firm in terms of what they did, albeit
19
in the manner in which they had to do it and the
20
timing, unfortunately, of the matter from their
21
perspective in having to do it, but that takes
22
nothing away from what the Court has already
23
remarked upon concerning the fact that now Fowler
24
White in the representation of Mr. Epstein had
25
these records from the inception is one of the
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
62
1
reasons for the Court's ruling.
2
MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, may we include in
3
the order a direction that opposing counsel is
4
required to relinquish possession of all copies of
5
the privileged documents to the Court under seal?
6
THE COURT: Well, the only thing that
7
obviously has to be taken into consideration is the
8
appellate rights of Mr. Epstein and how they're
9
going to preserve those rights in light of the fact
10
that the Court has rejected the last minute request
11
for in-camera inspection for the reasons that I've
12
already stated at length on the record.
Page 73
EFTA00801844
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
13
MR. SCAROLA: Which is why I've suggested that
14
they be relinquished to the Court under seal, your
15
Honor. They can be given an exhibit number. To
16
the extent that the appellate court finds it
17
reasonable and necessary to examine those
18
documents, the appellate court will have the
19
opportunity to do that.
20
THE COURT: So you're suggesting to file with
21
the Clerk of Court under seal the documents at
22
issue?
23
MR. SCAROLA: Yes, sir, that's correct.
24
THE COURT: That's better stated.
25
Do you have any objection?
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
63
1
MS. ROCKENBACH: No objection, your Honor.
2
THE COURT: So stipulated.
3
MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor will recall that
4
opposing counsel has also informed the Court on
5
multiple occasions that backup in the preparation
6
for this case was being provided by the Gunster law
7
firm, and we would like a certification from them
8
as well that no copies have been retained.
Page 74
EFTA00801845
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
9
MR. LINK: They don't have any, Judge.
10
THE COURT: Okay. That's fine. If Mr. Link
11
and Miss Rockenbach are representing that to the
12
Court, I'm satisfied with that representation.
13
MR. SCAROLA: And I accept that representation
14
as well, your Honor, but what we would like and
15
believe we are entitled to is a list of all persons
16
to whom the privileged documents have been
17
disseminated. And I'm particularly concerned in
18
this regard; that the testimony of any witness
19
might be influenced by their improper exposure to
20
privileged documents. So we ask that a complete
21
list of all persons to whom those documents have
22
been disseminated or the contents of the documents
23
that been disseminated be provided to us.
24
And I know that Mr. Cassell has some concerns
25
in that regard as well that he would like to
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
64
1
address with the Court. So if he may have an
2
opportunity to speak to the Court in this regard --
3
THE COURT: That's fine.
Page 75
EFTA00801846
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
4
Mr. Link, if you want to comment on that?
5
MR. LINK: Yeah. I think I can solve that
6
problem very easily, your Honor.
7
The documents were within my law firm, and my
8
client. That's it. They haven't been shown to any
9
third parties. There's not a third-party witness
10
for me to put on the stand. And you have ruled we
11
can't use them. We won't use them.
12
MR. SCAROLA: Does that include Mr. Epstein?
13
THE COURT: Does what include Mr. Epstein?
14
MR. SCAROLA: Has Mr. Epstein been provided
15
with copies of the documents or the contents of
16
these privileged documents?
17
MR. LINK: I just said my client. My law firm
18
and my client. And I can say legal counsel,
19
Mr. Goldberger. So that's it.
20
MR. SCAROLA: That may require some further
21
relief that we can address at another time.
22
And so that the record is clear, your Honor,
23
we believe that sanctionable conduct has occurred,
24
and we are reserving the right at a later time --
25
but it's not something that needs to be addressed
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
Page 76
EFTA00801847
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
65
1
now -- but we're reserving the right to address the
2
issue of appropriate sanctions at a later time.
3
THE COURT: Thank you.
4
Mr. Cassell?
5
MR. CASSELL: Thank you, your Honor. Paul
6
Cassell, and I'm here this afternoon, and I
7
understand it's getting late in the day, I'll be
8
very brief, representing three victims; LM, EW and
9
Jane Doe. Just one housekeeping matter.
10
We have filed a motion to intervene, which is
11
unopposed.
12
THE COURT: The only thing I need is an order.
13
Everything else was provided but the proposed
14
order. So if it's unopposed, then phrase it as
15
such and I'll be glad to execute it.
16
MR. CASSELL: Thank you, your Honor.
17
Just so the record is clear, on July 19, 2010,
18
seven and a half years ago, LM said these very
19
documents are privileged, and on February 23, 2011,
20
EW and Jane Doe through counsel said these
21
documents are privileged. So the Epstein entity
22
that is Mr. Epstein and his array of lawyers were
23
on notice at that time that every one of these 45
Page 77
EFTA00801848
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
24
documents was privileged.
25
And then what happened on Friday night, March
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
66
1
2nd, was that Mr. Link put into the public court
2
file summaries of the e-mails, quoting from them
3
directly, and we believe that was improper. And
4
indeed, we've heard today Mr. Link represent to the
5
Court all we wanted was an in-camera review, but of
6
course they wanted something more. They wanted to
7
put those in the public court file because they
8
knew than the cat would be out of the bag,
9
publicity would ensue, and other damage to my
10
clients could occur. And so I'm here this
11
afternoon to raise what I think are time of the
12
essence concerns about the release of those
13
privileged materials by Mr. Epstein. When I use
14
the term "Mr. Epstein," I'll be referring to this
15
entity.
16
Let's be clear. There is no doubt from sworn
17
testimony in front of the Court that on January 10,
18
2018 agents of this law firm picked up a disk from
Page 78
EFTA00801849
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
19
the Fowler White law firm, and the Fowler White law
20
firm, as you know from the ELMO, had been directed
21
some six or seven years earlier not to retain any
22
copies of these documents. So there should be no
23
dispute about the circumstances right now.
24
At that time Mr. Link's law firm, Mr. Epstein,
25
were in possession of documents that Fowler White
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
67
1
was in possession of that were in violation of a
2
court order. Mr. Scarola has used the term "stolen
3
documents" and I think that, frankly, describes
4
accurately the nature of the documents, although
5
who the thief was, of course, remains to be
6
determined.
7
So the question in front of you right now is
8
what to do about this. Well, we know one thing.
9
We know there's been absolutely no waiver of
10
attorney/client privilege. How do we know that?
11
Well, your Honor knows the Florida law very well.
12
To be a waiver of attorney/client privilege is
13
something that is disfavored. There has to be a
14
clear, intentional waiver of the privilege. And
Page 79
EFTA00801850
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
15
how do we know there's not been a clear,
16
intentional waiver of the privilege? Just use
17
Mr. Link's word. Things are clear as mud. Well,
18
if something is clear as mud, there cannot be an
19
intentional waiver. So there's no waiver of
20
attorney/client privilege.
21
I know the hour is late.
22
THE COURT: You don't have to feel rushed. I
23
want to make sure that you're heard and that your
24
clients are heard.
25
MR. CASSELL: Thank you, your Honor. We
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
68
1
appreciate that because what we've heard shockingly
2
this afternoon is -- let me -- I know we need to be
3
careful with language -- let's just say an accused
4
abuser, Mr. Epstein, the man accused of abusing my
5
three clients, we are told has seen these very
6
privileged documents. We're told Mr. Goldberger
7
has seen them. We're told, of course, Mr. Link and
8
his law firm has seen them. And of course this
9
very large law firm, the Fowler White law firm, has
Page 80
EFTA00801851
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
10
seen them as well. And so the question is what do
11
we do?
12
And we're mindful in the fact you're about to
13
embark on what's likely to be a very time-consuming
14
trial. So I would like to impose six remedies that
15
we would ask you to execute today; none of which, I
16
want to emphasize, will require consumption of the
17
Court's time other than signing the proposed order
18
that we will provide for you.
19
The first is -- Mr. Scarola has already asked
20
for this and I believe obtained this, but I want
21
the record to be clear. My clients are asking that
22
you preclude any use of the privileged exhibits
23
either directly, indirectly or derivatively during
24
the upcoming trial because if someone relies on
25
this information, for example, in asking a question
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
69
1
to Mr. Edwards or asking a question to any of the
2
witnesses that Mr. Edwards is presenting, that
3
could implicitly reveal privileged information.
4
THE COURT: We have all done this, so don't
5
feel like you're alone. Are you talking about Mr.
Page 81
EFTA00801852
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
6
Epstein?
7
MR. CASSELL: I'm sorry. If Mr. Epstein's
8
attorneys do that, that's the concern.
9
So, for example, if they're formulating any
10
questions to Mr. Edwards, they shouldn't be able to
11
use any privileged information because we're
12
worried that that could implicitly disclose
13
privileged communications.
14
Secondly, we would like Epstein counsel -- and
15
that's a broad term that includes -- I've probably
16
lost track of the different law firms, but
17
Mr. Link's law firm, the Fowler White law firm, I
18
believe there are several others, Mr. Goldberger's
19
law firm, we want them all to canvass their
20
records, canvass their e-mails, canvass their
21
servers and tell us if they -- how did this happen?
22
How did this happen?
23
THE COURT: You're talking about how did the
24
Fowler White firm garner these records?
25
MR. CASSELL: Correct.
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
70
Page 82
EFTA00801853
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
1
THE COURT: Well, I'm not sure that any of
2
their servers are going to shed light on that.
3
MR. CASSELL: Well, it may be, for example
4
THE COURT: I don't want to go on a fishing
5
expedition, as you can appreciate. I don't want to
6
exacerbate the problem; meaning, I don't want to
7
unnecessarily delve into myriad e-mail systems to
8
gain knowledge that is likely residing at the
9
Fowler White firm in some form or fashion, whether
10
it be current or former employees or otherwise. So
11
I am not going to go to that extent at this
12
juncture without further proof or basic proof for
13
going in that direction.
14
MR. CASSELL: That would be our request. But
15
there would be a broad -- you phrased it fishing
16
expedition. We would phrase it a retrieval
17
expedition -- to retrieve what's happened here.
18
But at the minimum we would ask your Honor then to
19
direct Epstein attorneys who were previously before
20
this Court, Fowler White, to examine the
21
circumstances here.
22
You noted that you thought there might have
23
been an obligation for them to address the Court
24
head on. I'm here telling you that the victims
Page 83
EFTA00801854
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
25
believe they, Fowler White, has an obligation to
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
71
1
address the victims head on. How did this happen?
2
THE COURT: And understandable. I was not
3
confining the obligation of Fowler White to those
4
entities that I mentioned. It was those entities
5
that came to the Court's mind initially. I don't
6
want this record to suggest I wasn't taking into
7
account the concerns of the victims.
8
MR. CASSELL: Certainly, your Honor, I wasn't
9
suggesting -- and this, of course, is my first
10
opportunity -- you have always referred to building
11
a record -- this is my opportunity to build a
12
record as well. So we want to know how these
13
materials were obtained.
14
The third thing we want to know is who were
15
the materials distributed to? Mr. Scarola has made
16
that request on behalf of his clients. I'm making
17
that request on behalf of my clients.
18
We're told that Mr. Goldberger has seen it,
19
we're told Mr. Epstein has seen it. We want to
20
know who else has seen it. And this, frankly, may
Page 84
EFTA00801855
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
21
require looking at e-mails, looking at servers and
22
that sort of thing.
23
I think the record should be clear that in a
24
routine case, you might say, "Well, that's going to
25
be too expensive." Your Honor is aware this is not
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
72
1
a routine case because I understand that two of the
2
finest and largest law firms here in. Florida are
3
currently representing Mr. Epstein, so they
4
certainly have the resources to search -- to
5
accomplish the searches that would be involved to
6
see how these materials got anywhere.
7
The fourth thing is we want an order directing
8
Mr. Epstein not to reveal the contents of this
9
information to anyone. We are told that
10
Mr. Epstein has seen the information, so he should
11
be singled out specifically for an order.
12
Fifth -- I think this has already been
13
recovered. All copies of the documents are to be
14
turned over under seal to the Court.
15
Sixth, we want our temporary sealing order,
Page 85
EFTA00801856
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
16
which we will provide later today, to be converted
17
into a permanent sealing order. Mr. Link filed in
18
the public court file, we believe highly
19
improperly, information that he was on notice was
20
privileged. And he said today he wanted an
21
in-camera review. Well, you do not get an
22
in-camera review when you put those very documents,
23
or at least summaries of those very documents, into
24
the public court file.
25
We want the Friday night filing, the notice of
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
73
1
redacted materials, to be placed under permanent
2
seal.
3
And then the last request is just a
4
housekeeping request. We're obviously scrambling
5
to sort out the implications of all this. I'm sure
6
I have missed some points that need to be made.
7
Due to the late filing of this document, due to the
8
public filing of the document improperly, we would
9
like leave to be able to file a supplemental
10
application for additional remedies after the trial
11
concludes and after we have received information
Page 86
EFTA00801857
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
12
about how the documents were obtained and who they
13
went to.
14
And so those are the requests that I make on
15
behalf of my two clients.
16
THE COURT: All right.
17
Mr. Link?
18
MR. LINK: Yes, sir. Thank you.
19
THE COURT: Thank you.
20
MR. LINK: I'm not sure how I can be more
21
clear about where we got the documents from. We
22
got them from Fowler White, your Honor. I don't
23
think that's a mystery anymore.
24
I've represented to the Court who I have
25
shared the papers with. The Court has ruled that
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
74
1
we're going to take the disks that we have and put
2
it under seal. We'll destroy all the other copies.
3
That's what Mr. Scarola asked for and that's what
4
we said we would do.
5
As to the filing, I never said all I wanted
6
was an in-camera inspection. What I said was
Page 87
EFTA00801858
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
7
Mr. Scarola said he would like one and I said
8
great, let's have one.
9
Most important is this: The documents that we
10
filed -- and there was some miscommunication with
11
Mr. Cassell -- I want to make sure the record is
12
clear -- we did two things: We filed redacted
13
documents. We redacted all of the names of EW, LM
14
and Jane Doe, as this Court has instructed. So
15
their initials were wiped out. Mr. Cassell called
16
me and said, "I'm looking at a document and I see
17
their initials." What he was looking at is we
18
served the counsel and hand delivered to the
19
Court -- did not put it in the public file -- the
20
unredacted documents so we would all know what was
21
in there.
22
THE COURT: By the court, you mean
23
MR. LINK: To you. To the judge.
24
THE COURT: -- to myself.
25
MR. LINK: Yes, sir.
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
75
1
THE COURT: Not as far as the court file is
2
concerned.
Page 88
EFTA00801859
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
3
MR. LINK: The court file only contains the
4
redacted version. We have double checked that. I
5
asked Mr. Cassell to tell me if I missed a
6
redaction. Could it happen? Yes, it could happen.
7
We haven't found one. If there was one that wasn't
8
redacted,
be glad to redact it. But the only
9
thing that was filed in the clerk file was the
10
redacted version.
11
Thank you, Judge.
12
THE COURT: All right. Thank you.
13
Much of which -- or much of the relief that
14
has been requested has essentially been taken care
15
of I believe through the Court's prior order; that
16
is, that the one disk containing the documents that
17
are being sought to be introduced at trial to take
18
to record will be permitted to be filed under seal.
19
The sanitized redacted versions of those records
20
I'm also ordering to be sealed in an abundance of
21
caution just in case there may be some error, not
22
intentional, on the part of counsel who filed those
23
records.
24
Mr. Epstein will be barred from referring to
25
any of those records as it relates to the documents
Page 89
EFTA00801860
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
76
1
that were gathered from Fowler White or from any
2
other source that would have included those records
3
that were the subject of Judge Ray's order. So
4
it's to preclude anything coming in through the
5
back door which wouldn't be allowed through the
6
front.
7
Mr. Link, did you want to comment on this?
8
MR. LINK: Yes. I wanted to remind the Court
9
we have over a hundred exhibits that were listed on
10
that disk that are already in the court file.
11
We've used them in depositions. So I'm
12
wondering -- those aren't excluded.
13
THE COURT: Right. I'm not talking about
14
those. I'm talking about the ones that have been
15
derived from Fowler White and that have been sought
16
to be introduced as part of the 748 or 724, or
17
whatever this number is, or the 45 that have been
18
claimed as privileged and have not been ruled upon
19
and will not be ruled upon prior to trial because
20
of the reasons that I have explained in detail
21
earlier.
Page 90
EFTA00801861
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
22
MR. LINK: Thank you, Judge.
23
THE COURT: Mr. Cassell, did I leave out
24
anything else?
25
MR. CASSELL: Yes. We want to know how the
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
77
1
Epstein entities came into possession of the
2
documents, and then we want to know where they
3
went.
4
THE COURT: Because of the court ruling, I
don't find that to be a front burner issue at this
6
time. Please don't confuse anyone here. The
7
Court's reference to front burner as opposed to
8
being an issue of importance. Front burner simply
9
means that in preparation for a trial that is
10
actually a mere two to three business days away, if
11
you count tomorrow, which I don't really count as a
12
court business day because of my obligations to the
13
Bench Bar Conference, I won't have the opportunity
14
to really delve into that prior to trial.
15
And as Mr. Scarola pointed out, I believe,
16
earlier, that can be done at another time. So I am
17
certainly not going to forget that it needs to be
Page 91
EFTA00801862
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
18
done. But it will be ordered that it be done post
19
trial.
20
Any other remedies that are sought as you go
21
along -- I understand the relative late nature of
22
these revelations; hence, you are not precluded
23
from filing a supplemental motion.
24
I also note that you have requested attorney's
25
fees and costs related to this endeavor, and I'm
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
78
1
reserving on that as well.
2
MR. CASSELL: But related to that is the
3
distribution. The cat is now wandering out of the
4
bag, so time is of the essence.
5
THE COURT: Right. And again, I think that in
6
an abundance of caution, and I understand your
7
concerns, but what the attorneys here recognize --
8
and Mr. Epstein is also under this order -- is that
9
no further dissemination is going to be made. I
10
think that goes without saying as far as the
11
attorneys are concerned. I've known each of them
12
seated at counsel table for many years, as I have
Page 92
EFTA00801863
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
13
known Mr. Scarola and Miss Terry, Mr. Burlington,
14
and I think they recognize that when this Court
15
makes a statement, that it is abundantly clear that
16
it will be enforced to the letter. I have no doubt
17
in my mind that they will all be respectful of the
18
court order of non-dissemination of any of those
19
documents hence forth.
20
And Mr. Link has already represented to the
21
Court that other than Mr. Epstein and his
22
co-counsel, that there have been no eyes laid upon
23
these documents. Hence, I'm accepting that
24
representation, as Mr. Scarola has accepted those
25
representations during the hearing as well.
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
79
1
MR. CASSELL: We haven't heard, of course,
2
from Fowler White. Will the Court direct them to
3
make similar representations?
4
THE COURT: I believe that I have sufficient
5
authority to do that under these relatively
6
peculiar circumstances. My jurisdiction, though,
7
is somewhat limited because they have withdrawn
8
from the case.
Page 93
EFTA00801864
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
9
As a general blanket order I would simply say
10
that all attorneys who have or are representing Mr.
11
Epstein shall be subject to this order of
12
confidentiality, of sealing and of non-
13
dissemination of any such information that is
14
contemplated in any of the documents that are part
15
of the umbrella order of Judge Ray. And that would
16
include all of the exhibits that we spoke about
17
today and that have been filed as a matter of
18
record.
19
MR. CASSELL: Could they also be directed to
20
make a representation as to who they have
21
distributed the documents to?
22
THE COURT: Mr. Link has already -- are you
23
talking about Fowler White?
24
MR. CASSELL: Fowler White.
25
THE COURT: I don't think that I have that
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
80
1
ability.
2
MR. CASSELL: Could I be heard on that issue
3
then? I believe that you do have -- all right.
Page 94
EFTA00801865
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
4
We'll deal with that later then, your Honor.
5
MR. LINK: Can I make a suggestion, your
6
Honor, that might be helpful?
7
THE COURT: Sure.
8
MR. LINK: We now have, I think, 34 or 36
9
boxes they delivered; I believe all the boxes they
10
have. The disk, the original disk, we now have it.
11
I don't know for sure, but I doubt that there's
12
another disk that they made and kept. If the Court
13
will instruct as part of this order that we
14
maintain the boxes, because Fowler White wanted
15
them back, then we will take possession of the
16
boxes.
17
THE COURT: If you are telling me that you
18
have authority from Mr. Epstein to retain those
19
boxes and Mr. Epstein is essentially giving you
20
carte blanche, you and Miss Rockenbach and
21
Mr. Goldberger jointly, the authority to make any
22
decisions necessary to protect his interests, that
23
motion would be granted.
24
MR. LINK: I'm standing here with this puzzled
25
look because I'm not sure what that means, frankly.
PALM BEACH REPORTING SERVICES, INC.
Page 95
EFTA00801866
2018-3-8 Hearing Transcript - Afternoon Session
81
1
All I was trying to do is say I will preserve the
2
documents, the original files, because I don't
3
think there's another set of files somewhere.
4
Fowler White had asked me to return them once we
5
went through them, and if the Court can instruct me
6
to hold the boxes, then I will do that.
7
THE COURT: I don't have a problem with making
8
that instruction, so I'll leave it at that. You're
9
speaking on behalf of your client, Mr. Epstein, as
10
well as your own law firm, and Mr. Goldberger, I
11
take it, as well, so I have no problem making -- in
12
entering this order since you're current counsel
13
for Mr. Epstein.
14
MR. LINK: Thank you, Judge. I think that
15
will make custody easier.
16
MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, there are two
17
additional matters that I would hope can be
18
disposed of in advance of the start of trial.
19
THE COURT: Sure.
20
MR. SCAROLA: One is Mr. Epstein's motion to
21
strike Dr. Jansen, and the second is issues with
22
regard to adverse inference. I think that both of
23
those matters have been fully briefed.
Page 96
EFTA00801867
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Phone
(561)471-2995Wire Ref
referenceWire Ref
referringRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
9p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
21p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00020703
0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
07/29/2011 14:05 FAX 5616845816
9p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
38p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
Discovery Request to Edwards and Response
44p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.