Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
H1- 1 EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND
Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
v.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,
Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff.
PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") gives notice that, in light of the
parties' differing views over the potentially privileged nature of the documents attached to
Epstein's Appendix in Support of his Response in Opposition to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
Bradley J. Edwards' ("Edwards") Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing the Scope
of Admissible Evidence, Epstein will not oppose Paul Cassell or Edwards filing a Motion seeking
to seal the documents in accordance with the requirements of Administrative Order 2.303-0/09
until such time as the Court has made a determination on Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare
Relevant and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents, and Request for Additional Limited
Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and Appointment of Special Master. Paul Cassell, who has
appeared on behalf of E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe, has requested that the documents be sealed to
protect his clients' interests, however, his clients' names were redacted from the Court filing.
EFTA00806712
Edwards' counsel's assertion that Epstein's current counsel obtained the documents in
some inappropriate or unethical way is completely without merit. Epstein has already notified
Edwards' counsel and Cassell that if they will identify by Bates number the documents they assert
are attorney-client communications, Epstein will segregate and seal those documents. Lastly,
Epstein wants the Court to understand that his agreement to not object is not based on any doubt
in his position that the documents on the disc were produced many years ago and that the disc
contains relevant and highly material e-mails that Epstein believes are case ending. Because the
disc was also produced to William Scherer in the Razorback litigation and because some of the
documents they claim were not to be produced were attached as exhibits to Edwards' deposition
in 2013, any work product protection has long ago been waived.
I certify that the foregoing document has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the
Service List below on March 6, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule
of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1).
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301
11110111.1
[fax]
By: /s/
Scott J. Link (FBN
Kara Berard Rockenbaclial
Angela M. Many (FBN
Primary:
Primary:
Primary:
Secondar
Secondar
Secondar
Secondar
Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein
2
EFTA00806713
SERVICE LIST
Jack Scarola
Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
Bradley J. Edwards
Nichole J. Segal
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
Courthouse Commons, Suite 350
444 West Railroad Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
Bradley J. Edwards
Bradley J. Edwards
Edwards Pottinger LW
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Ft. Lauderdale. FL
2
Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
Bradley J. Edwards
Marc S. Nurik
Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein
Jack A. Goldberger
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
•
Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Je re E. stein
VIA EMAIL
Paul Cassell
383 S. University Str.
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe
VIA EMAIL
Jay Howell
Jay Howell & Associates
644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250
Jacksonville, FL 32211
jayhowell.com
Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe
3
EFTA00806714