Case File
efta-efta00808583DOJ Data Set 9OtherFiling # 75541735 E-Filed 07/26/2018 11:08:16 AM
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00808583
Pages
7
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Filing # 75541735 E-Filed 07/26/2018 11:08:16 AM
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and
individually,
Defendants.
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO
COMPEL COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS TO IDENTIFY BATES
NUMBERS OF DOCUMENTS PRODUCED
Bradley J Edwards ("Edwards"), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this
Response in Opposition to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Compel Edwards to Identify
Bates Numbers of Documents Produced thereto, and as grounds therefor states as follows:
In 2012, Edwards filed his privilege log in the underlying lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Epstein
("Epstein") against Edwards, Scott Rothstein, and victim ■. Although Epstein made some effort
to challenge the privilege log in early 2012, he (through his prior counsel, Fowler White)
eventually abandoned these discovery issues and instead chose to voluntarily dismiss all of his
claims against Edwards on the eve of a summary judgment hearing, without ever having filed any
opposition. As the barrage of recent motions demonstrates, Epstein's new trial counsel does not
agree with Fowler White's litigation strategy decision in this matter.
Now, six years later, after discovery has been closed since November 2017 and two (2)
trial dates have been continued at the request of Epstein, Epstein's new trial counsel seeks to
EFTA00808583
Edwards adv. Epstein
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel Identification of Bates Number.
relitigate waived discovery issues in order to continue wasting Court resources and to ensure that
no jury is ever impaneled to decide Edwards' malicious prosecution counterclaim. Epstein's
newest tactic? Motion practice requesting that Edwards' counsel review discovery production in
the underlying case that occurred over five years ago to "identify by Bates number the documents
that [were] produced in this case." If Epstein's new trial counsel would like to know what Epstein's
former trial counsel knew — which documents were produced to them in this case - they should
contact the numerous prior attorneys that have represented Epstein in this proceeding. Or they
should consult with their co-counsel, Jack Goldberger, Esq., who has been counsel of record for
years in this case. In any event, it is simply not the responsibility of Edwards' counsel to perform
document review for Epstein's trial counsel, of documents already reviewed by Edwards' counsel
years ago.
Moreover, Edwards has already specifically identified by bates number the 49 privileged
documents that Epstein obtained in violation of a Federal bankruptcy court order and attempted to
list as exhibits the week before the parties' March 13, 2018 trial date. Those documents are
identified in the chart below, which was included in Edwards' Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely
Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing
Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privilege Log, which the Court granted at the March 8,
2018 pre-trial hearing:
Number of Privileged Emails
in Epstein's Possession
(49 TOTAL)
Bates Numbers from Epstein's
Untimely Supplemental
Exhibit #13
Bates Number/Range on
Edwards' February 23, 2011
Privilege Log
1
02645
02633-02646
1
00149
00149
2
EFTA00808584
Edwards adv. Epstein
Case No. 502009CA040800)OOOO4BAG
Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel Identification of Bates Number.
1
01527
01527
1
04493
04491-04518
1
04494
04494
1
04495
04495
1
00014
00014
1
00090
00090
1
00133
00133
1
08006
08000-08011
1
00026
00026
1
01004
01003-01005
I
12289
12289
1
26481
26479-26481
I
26480
26479-26481
1
26356
26356
1
26570
26570
1
03731
03719-03736
3
06406-06408
06404-06408
1
01686
01686
3
11123-11125
11123-11136
1
11126
11126
1
25925
25925
25874
25874
1
11145
11143-11146
3
EFTA00808585
Edwards adv. Epstein
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel Identification of Bates Number.
1
03191
03191-03196
5
04398-04402
04387-04402
5
04408-04412
04403-04416
1
267476
26741-26763
1
08042
08033-08070
1
26741
26741-26763
3
08059-08061
08033-08070
3
26756-26758
26741-26763
3
08036-08038
08033-08070
1
26762
26741-26763
1
01117
01112-01117
3
08121-08123
08118-08123
4
26749-26752
26741-26763
3
08128.08130
08124-08156
3
08118-08120
08118-08123
3
08131-08133
08124-08156
3
08124-08126
08124-08156
4
08135-08138
08124-08156
1
27494
27494
1
26760
26741-26763
1
25997
25997
1
25937
25937
2
26604-26605
26604-26605
4
EFTA00808586
Edwards adv. Epstein
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel Identification of Bates Number.
3
07019-07021
07019-07024
Lastly, the time-consuming exercise Epstein is requesting Edwards' counsel to perform is
one that he can complete himself. It would require starting with the filed privilege log, which
clearly indicates all documents by Bates number which were, at that time, withheld from
production on the basis of an assertion of privilege. Later, a category of documents consisting of
approximately 163 pages of emails on the privilege log were ordered to be produced and those
documents were then produced. The combination of all Bates numbers not included on the
privilege log plus the 163 pages that were later ordered to be produced comprises the universe of
produced documents.
Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff Bradley Edwards respectfully requests that the Court
deny Epstein's motion.
5
EFTA00808587
Edwards adv. Epstein
Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel Identification of Bates Number.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve
to all Counsel on the attached list, this at; day of July, 2018.
JACK SCAROLA
Florida Bar No.:
KAREN E. TERRY
Florida Bar No.:
DAVID P. VITALE JR.
Florida Bar No.:
Attorney E-Mails:
and
Primary E-Mail:
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley,
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach Florida 33409
Phone:
Fax:
Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards
6
EFTA00808588
Edwards adv. Epstein
•
Case No. 502009CA040800)OOO(MBAG
Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel Identification of Bates Number.
COUNSEL LIST
Scott J. Link, Esq.
Kara Rockenbach,
Link & Rockenbach,
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Pho
Fax:
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
Jack A. Goldbe er,
uire
After ury oldberger &
250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phon
Fax:
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
Nichole J. Se al, Es uire
•
Burlington & Rockenbach,
444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561)-721-0400
Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards
Bradley J. Edwards, Es
Esquire
425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort
Pho
Fax:
EFTA00808589
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Phone
(561)-721-0400Phone
5541735Wire Ref
ReferenceRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15'h JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
8p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15'h JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
8p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
14p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
5p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.