Case File
efta-efta00811471DOJ Data Set 9OtherMonday. October 22. 2018
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00811471
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Monday. October 22. 2018
VIRGIN ISLANDS
The Virgin Islands Daily News 3
Excise tax violates U.S. Constitution, Gomez rules
By BRIAN O'CONNOR
Dairy News Staff
A federal judge's ruling could
imperil $45 million in government
tax revenues, court records show.
US. District Court Judge Curtis
Gomez ruled on Sept. 28 that the
excise Lax — levied against items
and goods imported into the Virgin
Islands — violated the Commerce
Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
The tax is worth 545 million in
revenue for the territorial govern-
ment, budget documents show.
It wasn't clear whether the rul-
ing would free businesses from ex•
else tax obligations. or create new
taxes for businesses not currently
covered by the tax.
The government. represented
by V.I. Attorney General Claude
Walker. has filed for an appeal
with the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals.
The Commerce Clause gives the
federal government sole power to
regulatecommerceamong the states.
The lawsuit that sparked the ruling
Curbs
Gomez
involves Reerce
Services lac., rep-
resented by Alex
Golubssky.
Reefro
spc•
cialires in in•
stalling
refrig-
eration
units.
air conditionen,
is makers and
water
makers
on local boats.
according
to
Gomee's ruling. The V.I. Internal
Revenue Bureau — which col-
lects taxes for the government —
changed Reck° for importing vari-
ous items over a number of years.
Territorial law allows an exemp-
tion to the excise tax for boats,
boat engines and boat pans.
Reel& sued the government.
arguing that the tax collected was
improper. The government argued
that the pans in question — in-
eluding small refrigerators and ice
makers — were not boat parts.
In an amended complaint, Reef-
ea also argued that the excise tax
was unconstitutional. Gomez ini•
daily dismissed that portion of the
complaint. in pan because the gov-
ernment is neither a person. nor a
federal agency, which arc covered
under other sections of federal law.
However. the Commerce Clause
— and constitutional law generally
— allows for claims against gov-
ernments. so Gomez reversed his
dismissal.
Excise taxes in the territory —
<sealed in V.I. Code Title 33, Sec-
tion 42 — date back at least as far
as 1980, when Congress passed a
law allowing for the collection of
the tax whenever an item is brought
into the territory Two years later.
Congress instructed federal offi•
cials to assist in the collection of
the tax.
In 1987, a case challenging the
excise tax as an illegal barrier to
commerce made it to the U$. Su-
preme Court.
Justices judged the ease moot,
in pan because of a 1984 change
to the law that required excise tax
to be levied against goods made
in the Virgin Islands, in addition
to goods imported into the Virgin
Islands.
However, Internal Revenue Bu-
reau employees testified during a
deposition that the government has
not charged local businesses the
exetse tax, despite the change in
law. Gomez wrote.
The opinion quotes Glenford
Hodge. the supervisor of excise tax
for the Internal Revenue Bureau.
as representative of the govern-
ment position.
"We have no basis to charge a
tax on something that's not im-
ported into the territory." Hodge is
quoted as saying.
Government regulations relating
to the excise tax have not been up•
dated since 1983. Gomez wrote in
his opinion.
The government "ignores the
corrective amendment to Section
42 and continues to implement
the pre.1984 statute that the Third
Circuit held was invalid under the
Commerce Clause." he wrote.
The law thus represents illegal
economic protectionism. Gomez
wrote.
The government "has not as-
serted any 'legitimate local pur-
pose' for this scheme, let alone
evidence or argument dot 'this
purpose could not be served as
well by available nonditetimina-
tory means.'" Gomez wrote, quot-
ing earlier case law. "Accordingly.
the Court holds that the Section 42
— as interpreted and enforced by
the GVI — violates the Commerce
Clause."
Gomez ordered $5.287.74 in
collected excise taxes returned to
Reefco
Internal Revenue Bureau Di-
rector Marvin Pickering directed
questions to Walker.
Walker declined to comment,
citing the ongoing legal case.
The case is tentatively scheduled
for hearing during a December
2019 visit by the 3rd Circuit judg-
es. court documents show.
— Contact Brian O'Connor
as 140414.9130 or email boron-
[email protected].
Yacht Haven Grande, EDA come to terms over benefits
By BRIAN WCONNOR
Ciatay News Stan
ST THOMAS — The VI. Foe-
norm Development Authority and the
owners of Yacht Haven Grande have
settled over the company's tax exempt
slam officials said.
The disagreement prompted EDA
officials to hold a "show cause" hear-
ing last week, in which the company
was ordered to show cause why it's
status should not be revoked suspend•
ed cc rrinds&d
Officials from Yacht Haven USVI.
which is owned by Island Global
Yachting, lad taken the position that
in-kind contnbutions — donations of
time and space for events for com-
munity stoups —should coon( finan-
cially ;ward community contribution
obligations required to maintain the
company's Economic Development
Commission program status. EDA
staff said they were bound by the letter
of the law to consider only monetary
contributions toward the total.
Thomas Mukamal. CEO of Island
Global Yachting. said the company
routinely often space at Yacht Haven
Grande foe community events Those
events come at a cost to his company.
Mukarnal
"We donate the venue and then
provide the cleaning services. Hai-
My staff, if it's an indoor maw." he
said. 'All of that stuff can be quite
expensive."
The dispute reached the Economic
Development Commission in part
Thomas
Mukamal
bfc30‘f EDA
lud Ixot
unckat
about
\View: Of ram in.
kind contr-Sut ions
mild be counted,
NIL:41331 said
"It would have
been
cheaper
to pay the fine
a year ago," he
said. "We wanted
to force them to
take a position."
The dispute over comnbutions is the
second time this year finthrial tensions
between WA aril Island Global Yacht-
ing have spilled into public. IG1LAYII
St. Thomas Holdings. aruther subsid-
iary company. was paced under a ben
for 549.036.90in unpaid gross receipts
taxes on June 25. The company was re-
leased from the lien — metwating the
tows had been paid or administrathey
waived — on Oct. 4.
The AYH stands for Amman
Yacht Haim, anodes EDC bor.&
ciary. Mukamal said. The Red lkok•
based retail location was awaiting
miewal of its EDC benefits for two
years, at which point the Internal Rev
awe Bureau mistakenly charged the
company gross receipts tax it was ex-
=ivied front. Mukamal said.
"They mina have bawd us up for
that pence he said.
The taxes were waned on renewal.
Mukamal said
Community contributions, mini-
mum employment standards, and lo
-
:tie veers Of Men
he V.I. Revive Festwal in December draws a large crowd to Yacht Haven
Grange on St. Thomas. The Economic Development Authority and the
Property's owners have settled a dispute over the company's tax-exempt
taws and whether in.krid contnbutons of space ft( events for community
groups shosid count toward nsoblgatons under the Economic Development
Con-reason program
cal hire rewirenwrns are all part of
the EUM EDC program_ In exclanµe
for meeting MOW Cnteria — rewired
community contributions can vary
from company to company and num-
ber in the lens of thousands of dollars
— EDC beneficiaries reccnv the fol-
towbar:tax benefits:
• 90 perms reduction in corporate
income tax
• 90 percent ;Simian in personal
interne lax
• I00 percent exemption on gross
receipt tax
• 100 percent exemption on business
property sex
• 100 percent exemption on excise
tax payments
• Reduction in the custorm duty
from the standard 6 percent to I percent
EDA Assistant Executive Direct&
Waync Biggs Jr. said officals were
togued
1'acht Haven's certificate
— %%Inch lists 'he compuny -speak re-
quirerrtnts for the program
to count
mccetary donations instead
"Mk follow the a...Idioms" lie said.
"The certificate. when it done, is a
contract between the EDC and the
Island Global las filed at applica-
tion to tredify its certificate to count ith
kind retributions in addition to mon-
easy contributiorn. Rigid aid. EDA
staff are m theI:cocoa of mincing the
spoken:m.84;gs said.
Similar settlements are a regular pan
of the EDC pecgram. Biggs said.
"1 think stele moving ahead." he
said "Settlements are all pan of the
proca
Once additinnal monetary contribu-
tions are made. Pt company will be
fully renewed Bus said. The FDA
welcomes in-kind contributions. but
officials are bound a follow
the,
kites
of the law, Boggs said.
"Now that we've settled, we consider
them to be in fullcompliance." he sari
Homier. Mukamal said the corn-
pony will hue to scrutinize community
events to host at Yacht Ibsenasa result
of the decision.
"Now we know" he said. "When
somebody asks us to do it. We'll likey
have to be a little mote selective in
how we do it. That's a potential and
unfortunate"
EDA board members Jose Pam.
Haklane Davies. Juan Figuerea and
Eugene Farrell vend unanimously for
the scnkmag
EFTA00811471
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Phone
414.9130Wire Ref
refrigeratorsForum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.