Case File
efta-efta00850777DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: Richard Kahn •
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00850777
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Richard Kahn •
To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
Subject: James - Boss asked about large retina external monitors
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 17:29:48 +0000
please advise if we should wait for next macbook pro which fames hopes will have thunderbolt 3 or purchase a
new external monitor now
if now please advise if you have a preference
atclk=5K%2f4K_4K&ci=6559&Ns=p_OVER_ALL_RATE%7cl&N=3878805754+4294949059+3842765824+
4024287381+4109119978+4294949005&origSearch=4k%20monitors
Richard Kahn
Begin forwarded message:
From: James ce I personal genius
Subject: Boss asked about large retina external monitors
Date: July 20, 2015 at 1:08:39 PM EDT
To: Richard Kahn
The appt with the boss went quickly this morning; I adjusted the FlashBlock settings in Firefox so YouTube
worked correctly, we dug out the hidden edit controls in Photos.app (the iPhoto replacement) and we spoke
about the overdue AppleTV refresh -
I showed him that he could pair the iOS Remote.app on his phone to
control the AppleTV (he complained about the horrid AppleTV remote).
He also asked about connecting his MacBook Pro to a large, retina quality external display. I mistakingly told
him that native 4K resolution wasn't supported in the current version of the mini-displayport in the Macs.
According to this Apple TechNote his current machine **will** support 4K (3840x2160) displays at 60 Mhz.
(The slightly larger 4096x2160 displays are supported at 60Hz in the newest MacBook Pro with the upgraded
video card.)
To go higher than 4096x2160 resolution **WILL** require the next version of Thunderbolt 3.0 / DisplayPort
1.3 adapter.
Upshot: we could get an external display for his laptop, but we can't go too large without the image quality
suffering. His Retina MacBook Pro's built-in display has a PPI (pixel per inch) density of 220; the previous,
EFTA00850777
non-retina MacBook Pro had a PPI of 129.
With a max output of 3840x2160, once we go above —30", the display will be noticeably not-retina, and over
34" it will have lower resolution than a non-retina MacBook Pro.
Here's how the PPI for 4K displays breakdown by size:
110" = 40 PPI
84" = 53 PPI
75" = 59 PPI
65" = 68 PPI
55" = 80 PPI
46" = 96 PPI
40" = 110 PPI
32" = 138 PPI
30" = 147 PPI
27" = 163 PPI
23" = 192 PPI
I expect the new MacBook Pros released this fall to include Thunderbolt 3 / DisplayPort 1.3 and support higher
resolution displays. (It wouldn't surprise me for Apple to release a 27" 5K display shortly after.)
recommend waiting for the new MacBook Pro, but if the boss would like to get an external monitor now,
B&H has a selection of suitable options here
James Ce
your Personal Genius
EFTA00850778
Technical Artifacts (7)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]Phone
+3842765824Phone
+4109119978Phone
+4294949005Phone
+4294949059Phone
3878805754Phone
4024287381Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01765224
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02328489
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02125460
0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
4p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02489202
1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA02086739
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.