Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00850988DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Peter Attia

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00850988
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Peter Attia To: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Subject: RE: No way! Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 23:20:45 +0000 AND every flight attendant who has been on a 27 knows, too! I still can't believe I did notice after flying a million miles on these things. Now I think it's going to bug the shit out of me! From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 4:19 PM To: Peter Attia Subject: Re: No way! yes, but fly by wire , so not easiliy servied in the states. I cant believe the experiment on one foot worked, it makes me crazy as i was inches away On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Peter Attia c > wrote: Meaning they are all bigger than 37s? From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacSg i mail com Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 4:14 PM To: Peter Attia Subject: Re: No way! no service in small places On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Peter Attia c > wrote: Ok, I did the following experiment... Stood mid-plane on one foot and closed my eyes... no problem. Perfectly still! Easy Tried the same stunt at the rear. Couldn't do it! Too much movement. You were right. How the hell do I fly so many miles on that equipment and not know that!? I went up the very front of the plane and the effect was present, but not as much as the rear. I told the flight attendants, both of whom had flown on 27s long ago. They agreed with the observation (though didn't appreciate the physics). They did also note that the 57 and 67, in turbulence are smoother than the 37. So here is question for you... have you looked at Airbus? Peter Attie I Nutrition Science Initiative (NuSI) I President 1650-465.4504 (m) I 858-914-5405 (o)1 www.nusi.org Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is confidential and intended only for the recipients listed above. If you have received this e-mail in error, please delete it immediately and inform the sender of the error or contact [email protected] EFTA00850988 please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00850989

Technical Artifacts (6)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.nusi.org
Phone1650-465.4504
Phone858-914-5405

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.