Case File
efta-efta00851149DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00851149
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
To: Noam Chomsky
Subject: Re: Re:
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:24:20 +0000
complicated linguistically.
1 disney's 2. it seems pluto and its moon were once one thing , but after an event
its current moon was not thrown far enough away to cause it to circle it, so they are connected by both gravity
and history, ( appropriate) 3. according to the frame of reference. 4. from plutos point of view , it would be
asking , who are you and what is self, from the moons perspective . the object of a strong attraction
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Noam Chomsky <
> wrote:
Who's Pluto?
From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 6:28 PM
To: Noam Chomsky
Subject: Re: Re:
"easy" , is for others . - glad she hasn't left .I think of you two as pluto and its moon
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Noam Chomsky <
wrote:
Mathematicians are lucky. Even more so than logicians, who worry about foundations.
As for the sciences, the luckiest is physics. If a molecule is too big, or some other system too complex, they handed
over to the chemists — who do the same with the biologists — who proceed to the psychological sciences — and then
on to history and literature. And of course depth of explanation is necessarily sacrificed along the way as complexity
mounts.
There are a few exceptions. Parts of linguistics, for example. It would be good to widen that bridgehead, but not
easy.
Valeria hasn't been able to leave yet. Maybe in a couple of days.
From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:18 PM
To: Noam Chomsky
Subject: Re:
EFTA00851149
I understand, mathematics are the unique formalism for proofs. . I watch the lack of direction and
leadership. , as in cognitive theory, with lots of data and no much beter understanding, I m trying to have
you give a new generation directions . prize, test. proof. demonstration. etc. as the evidence of real
advance.
how is it without your valeria. must be much different
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Noam Chomsky <
wrote:
Some efforts, but nothing satisfying. One problem is a fundamental difference between math and science. When
a math problem is posed and solved, it's solved. There's a proof. There are no proofs in the empirical world. Just
better theories, that could be (and usually are) at least partially wrong.
From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 9:41 AM
To: Noam Chomsky
Subject:
the chomsky questions.?
any headway„
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
EFTA00851150
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00851151
Technical Artifacts (5)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Wire Ref
referenceRelated Documents (6)
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.