From: "jeffrey E." <jeevacation®gmail.com>

From: "jeffrey E." <jeevacation®gmail.com> To: Valeria Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 05:29:46 +0000 attractions like gravity are mutual On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Valeria Chomsky < wrote: Who is the object of a strong attraction -- Noam or me? Valeria Charon Chomsky -------- Forwarded message From: Noam Chomsky •cl Date: Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:47 PM Subject: RE: Re: To: "jeffrey E." <jeta@grrtn> Cc: Hmm. Will have to ponder this for deeper significance. From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 8:24 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: complicated linguistically. 1 disney's 2. it seems pluto and its moon were once one thing , but after an event its current moon was not thrown far enough away to cause it to circle it, so they are connected by both gravity and history, ( appropriate) 3. according to the frame of reference. 4. from plutos point of view , it would be asking , who are you and what is self, from the moons perspective . the object of a strong attraction On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Noam Chomsky < > wrote: Who's Pluto? From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 6:28 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: EFTA00851157 "easy" , is for others . - glad she hasn't left .I think of you two as pluto and its moon On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Noam Chomsky > wrote: Mathematicians are lucky. Even more so than logicians, who worry about foundations. As for the sciences, the luckiest is physics. If a molecule is too big, or some other system too complex, they handed over to the chemists — who do the same with the biologists — who proceed to the psychological sciences — and then on to history and literature. And of course depth of explanation is necessarily sacrificed along the way as complexity mounts. There are a few exceptions. Parts of linguistics, for example. It would be good to widen that bridgehead, but not easy. Valeria hasn't been able to leave yet. Maybe in a couple of days. From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:18 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: I understand, mathematics are the unique formalism for proofs. . I watch the lack of direction and leadership. , as in cognitive theory, with lots of data and no much beter understanding, I m trying to have you give a new generation directions . prize, test. proof. demonstration. etc. as the evidence of real advance. how is it without your valeria. must be much different On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Noam Chomsky > wrote: Some efforts, but nothing satisfying. One problem is a fundamental difference between math and science. When a math problem is posed and solved, it's solved. There's a proof. There are no proofs in the empirical world. Just better theories, that could be (and usually are) at least partially wrong. From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 9:41 AM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: the chomsky questions.? any headway„ EFTA00851158 please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00851159 please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00851160