Case File
efta-efta00855152DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: "Noam Chomsky"
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00855152
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Noam Chomsky"
To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
CC: '
Subject: RE: language of the blind
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 04:33:45 +0000
Attachments: Modularity_Fodor 6-15.docx
This is the best work I know. It's been carried forward. I'd really urge that you contact Lila, a fine person and an
outstanding scientist (and an old friend).
There's a fundamental difference between input systems like the mapping from stimuli (sound, light,...) to some internal
representation, on the one hand, and language, though they are often confounded. I'll attach an almost complete draft of
an article on the topic, part of a symposium on Jerry Fodor's influential work Modularity. The basic difference is that
language is not an input system at all. Rather, it is a central system, accessed both for input and output — and for the most
part (by a huge margin) used without either input or output.
Noam
From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 7:40 AM
To: Noam Chomsky
Subject: Re: language of the blind
Im only a few hours into her work, and strangely enough . much of her evidence ( cognizant of my bias )
oddly enough , seems to be in support of my naive conjecture that the mapping from external light ( an
ordered set ) to coherent mental image is homologous to the mapping from mechanical wave ( an ordered set )
to coherent sound image. ( I thought you to suggest that neither are necessarily required for thought functions
ie language does not need sound nor light It is possilble that .thought units and their relationships can be
represented by a space of the homologus maps .this is what i believe you have called language.
she has great
examples of blind persons representations of verticals , horizontals stronger than she understands.
many many
useful but clearly not diapositive examples. Also unclear whether some of her " blind" shared a deficient map
from light to image or deficient from image to represenation ( sight blind ).
I "smell" elegant theories ahead )::
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Noam Chomsky
l> wrote:
Quite a few. Will have to give it some thought, to winnow it down.
From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 10:48 PM
To: Noam Chomsky
Subject: Re: language of the blind
who else do you respect. ( not limited to field ). . that we might find each other amusing
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Noam Chomsky
> wrote:
Very good to have a chance to talk today, as always. And enjoyed the follow-up conversation too.
Interesting people. Especially Martin.
EFTA00855152
The study on acquisition of language by the blind that I mentioned is: Barbara Landau and Lila Gleitman,
Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child. From about 25 years ago. A real breakthrough
at the time. There's been work since, much of it by Lila Gleitman and her students. Lila, incidentally, is
someone you might want to get to know. An old friend, and a really outstanding psycholinguist-cognitive
scientist, one of the best.
Noam
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00855153
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Related Documents (6)
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.