Case File
efta-efta00857854DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00857854
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
To: Martin Weinberg
Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 14:43:48 +0000
i dont think they can resist producing the interview? to us
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Martin Weinberg <
> wrote:
There are legal and practical issues involved with such a subpoena from Alan in the context of his defamation
case. Legally, the media does not have an absolute privilege but a court will (upon a motion to quash) test the
subpoena against a high standard of materiality, importance, whether its a fishing expedition, whether the same
information is available from another source (eg a deposition of VR herself). See pgs 16-19 of attached
(which is an overview, 7 yrs old, of how the media resists subpoenas). Practically, lets see what ABC decides.
I emailed Hill without response yesterday. Alan will call Zucker with whom he has a relationship Monday.
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
Boston, MA 02116
ell
This Electronic Message contains
information from the Law Office of
Martin G. Weinberg, P.C.,
and may be privileged. The
information is intended for the
use of the addressee only. If you
are not the addressee, please note
that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or use of the
contents of this message is
prohibited.
EFTA00857854
On Sat, 5/2/15, jeffrey E. <jeevacation®gmail.com> wrote:
Subject:
To: "Martin Weinberg" <
>, "Kathy Ruemmler"
Date: Saturday, May 2, 2015, 8:19 AM
I assume that abc
must have done some homework . we have heard nothing,
yet. is there homework reachable by alan under a depo
request of mr hill?
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com,
and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00857855
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: "Martin G. Weinberg" <
2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Martin Weinberg
36p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Martin Weinberg
25p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: J <[email protected]>
1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025
Internal email chain discussing motion to unseal Jeffrey Epstein appeal briefs (Dec 2018)
The passage reveals that attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein were actively filing a motion to unseal redacted appellate briefs in 2018, indicating that undisclosed information may exist in those documents. Attorney Jack Browning filed a motion to unseal redacted briefs from Epstein's 2011 appeal. The motion set a return date of Dec 31, 2018, suggesting a narrow window for opposition. Recipients include
1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: J <[email protected]>
12p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.