Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00861080DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00861080
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: "Martin G. Weinberg" Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 00:03:56 +0000 can you send in a different format so redlining shows On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Martin G. Weinberg c - wrote: Until pg 25, just some red-tracked inserts that would help but nothing pivotal Starting at pg 25 some more serious issues revolving around (1) your own quoted statement that minimizes what you were alleged to have done which can be used against you if there were ever a CVRA remedy phase or ever any other legal case where your credibility and morality was at issue. The quotation is the single worst paragraph to me (particularly when it matches the reporter's later non-verbatim conclusion of your having no regret as to anything you did other than not following legal advice better) (2) Your denying everything VR says. This at least walks you toward giving her (and the Boies firm) a basis to sue for defamation (I am not an authority on NY state defamation law as to whether a public denial of a quoted allegation is a defamatory statement but it bears looking into) an escape from the settlement agreement and a basis to sue you (3) Your being quoted as saying the NPA was coercive, Kafkaesque, implicitly that it was unfair to you — this will hurt you if CVRA gets to remedy phase and J Marra is exercising any discetion (although we will principally rely on contract and constitutional law) I have inserted red-track comments. I have "over-edited" the article not knowing whether you have the relationship with the reporter to have him extract several of the more substantive and to me harmful paragraphs. I am not the person (as you've said before) to weigh in on the PR effect in NY, elsewhere, probably is quite powerful and positive (I leave that assessment to you) but from a legal perspective which is what I think you are asking the edits go from small ones (add not underage to descriptions of young comely females), to the substantive. I would limit any discussions to those not involving your case. Feel free to blame me. From: jeffrey E. Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 5:23 PM To: Martin Weinberg Subject: Re: look at this... thanks, On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Martin Weinberg wrote: I will read the newest version when i get to computer in 1 hr Sent from my iPhone On Mar 29, 2015, at 4:39 PM, "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> wrote: any issues ? Forwarded message From: Michael Wolff Date: Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:52 PM Subject: look at this... To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> It will probably have to be cut some and there will be other queries and I continue to smooth and tinker, but this is getting close. How 'bout we speak tomorrow, late morning? And don't forget Gates comment extolling your talent, virtue, and contributions to the future of the foundation I m. EFTA00861080 please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or bye-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved <JEdraft-3-28-JE.rtf> please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00861081

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Epstein advised to use anti‑Trump narrative to counter upcoming Patterson book

The passage reveals a strategic communication plan discussed between Jeffrey Epstein and Michael Wolff, suggesting Epstein’s intent to shape public perception by positioning himself against Donald Tru Email chain dated March 18, 2016 between Jeffrey Epstein, Martin Weinberg, Kathy Ruemmler, Darren In Discussion of a forthcoming Patterson book slated for August 2016 and its potential political impa

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Martin G. Weinberg" <

2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Reporter inquires about alleged Trump‑Epstein property deal and potential criminal exposure

The email references a specific claim that Donald Trump bought a Palm Beach property that Jeffrey Epstein intended to purchase, and that Epstein threatened to expose Trump’s “shady” real estate deals. Alleged purchase by Trump of a Palm Beach property originally slated for Epstein. Claim that Epstein threatened to reveal illegal or suspicious Trump real‑estate transactions. Reference to a Crime Vi

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Reporter inquires about alleged Trump‑Epstein real‑estate deal and potential criminal exposure

The email chain references a Guardian story and a forthcoming news piece that allege Donald Trump bought a Palm Beach property that Jeffrey Epstein intended to purchase, and that Epstein may have had Kate Briquelet cites a Guardian article about Michael Wolff’s book alleging a Trump‑Epstein property The email asks whether Epstein possessed knowledge of illegal or suspicious Trump activities. Refe

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Martin G. Weinberg"

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.