Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00866982DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "jeffrey E." <jeevacationggmail.com>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00866982
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "jeffrey E." <jeevacationggmail.com> To: G Maxwell Subject: Re: Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 16:36:48 +0000 has been offered a porn movie for 500k . On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:03 PM, G Maxwell > wrote: I didn't do a statement. Want me lawyer to talk to your a come up with something. + I need to distance myself probably from you in some way. Barden my lawyer is going to call yours today. Who or what is Kathy?? What gossip. Helps me to know if you cab share plse. See bellow. THE TERRAMAR PROJECT FACEBOOK TWITTER G+ PINTEREST INSTAGRAM PLEDGE THE DAILY CATCH From: Jeffrey E. Sent: Saturday, 10 January 2015 10:58 To: G Maxwell Subject: Fwd: Forwarded message From: Martin C. Weinberg < Date: Saturday, January 10, 2015 Subject: To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Darren Indyke < but saying they are false is setting up the same defamation suit (at least if UK law parallels US law which I know it doesn't at least in some respects). Why not an affirmative denial rather than statement of untruthfulness. our goal is to avoid another bruising proceeding, more publicity, and risk to Ghislaine taken for very little upside. Isn't the press dying down? Isn't this just re-flaming? From: jeffrey E. Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 10:34 AM To: Martin Weinberg ; Dan-en Indyke Subject: Fwd: kathys suggetion i did not tell ghislane about kathy, iam concernced that it will start more gossip Forwarded message From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Date: Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:58 AM Subject: To: Gmax < EFTA00866982 I understand the desire to put out a definitive statement, and obviously this is your decision to make in consultation with your lawyers, but I think there are some real risks to you by personally attacking VR and getting into this level of detail. First, the Florida lawyers have shown no hesitation in filing lawsuits, and they very well may retaliate against you for attacking VR. Second, they will likely use a detailed statement like this to justify seeking discovery (interrogatories, depositions, etc.) from you in the lawsuits that are already pending. Third, the statement as drafted leaves open as many questions as it answers, and therefore will not likely put an end to these stories. To mitigate these problems, my recommendation would be to issue a general denial along the following lines: The allegations made against me by the woman identified in court papers as Jane Doe #3 are unequivocally false and deeply offensive and hurtful to me personally. I have never engaged in the type of inappropriate conduct that she alleges. I intend to report these false, damaging, and unfair allegations to the press complaints commission, and I will not further participate in the tabloid media circus that these absurd allegations have created. please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and EFTA00866983 destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00866984

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainjeevacationggmail.com

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.