Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00867435DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00867435
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: "Martin G. Weinberg" Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 18:11:26 +0000 could you call me, thanks On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Martin G. Weinberg < > wrote: I have no advanced knowledge as to this afternoon's agenda but would expect they would want some history on the NPA, Jane Doe #102 lawsuit, the investigation, the CVRA, A letter from them to USAO has no downsides. A filing from them on Alan's behalf in the CVRA is also something they are considering. It may or more likely may not get traction with J Marra (see his attached order on Reinhart) but it would at least put before your judge Alan's strong denials and, as important, a distancing of Alan from the NPA, its immunity provisions, any conflicts of interest etc as well as containing an expected strong criticism of the gratuitous including of a detailed uncorroborated accusation when it was immaterial to the joinder issue. Hopefully the Govt will raise lathes, delay as a reason to exclude VR as JD 3. If you have strong views on whether such a motion should/should not be filed let me know before the call. From: jeffrey Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2015 9:44 AM To: Martin G. Weinberg Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Letter to usao? On Sunday, January 4, 2015, Martin G. Weinberg < wrote: Kendall Coffey is Alan's attorney, former federal judge, US Atty Torn Scott the lawyer/expert From: Jeffrey E. Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2015 9:14 AM To: Martin G. Weinberg Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Who are they? On Sunday, January 4, 2015, Martin G. Weinberg <javascript:_e(%76%7D,[email protected]');> wrote: I will be speaking with Alan's lawyers at 2:30. They are considering an intervention despite the Reinhart Order. I intend to tell them that you would not consent to your lawyer (prior lawyer?) testifying about his relationship with you at this time at a voluntary deposition. A battle of video depositions would not in anyway help anyone. From: Jeffrey E. Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2015 7:48 AM To: Kathy Ruemmler ; Darren Indyke ; Alan Dershowitz ; Martin Weinberg Subject: Conclusion my friend upon hearing the evidence that s lying said ". Jeffrey, you're being silly, every thinking person knows she is lying but you have to admit it's fun to watch. Royals sex money celebrity. How can you not watch". Let's deal with it with a legal motion and I strongly suggest a halt in trying to manage . It merely contributes to the theater. Thanks please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited EFTA00867435 and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or bye-mail to javascript:_e(%789670,1cvml. destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or bye-mail to javascript:_e(%7B%70,1cvmr, destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved );, and );, and EFTA00867436

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.