Case File
efta-efta00872905DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: "jeffrey E." <jeevacationggmail.com>
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00872905
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "jeffrey E." <jeevacationggmail.com>
To: "Martin G. Weinberg"
Subject: Re: ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 01:14:18 +0000
i dont want to go to trial. . i think that if the judge saw this hed go crazy
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 8:11 PM, Martin G. Weinberg <
wrote:
I don't know all the ins/outs, strategy re current case but my defaults would be to rely on a pleading not an indirect press
release and to prioritize using in the case before you in the most effective way you can
Around in AM if you want to discuss.
From: jeffrey E.
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 5:50 PM
To: Martin G. Weinberg
Subject: Re: ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE
maybe alan releases to the press.? dont want to wait until trial. . another summary judgement motion. ? at the same time release
to the press. in FULL.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 5:45 PM, Martin G. Weinberg <
> wrote:
Not sure how the prior law firm would have received these emails but they surely have a chain of custody, a disc from
which they were printed, others before/after. You don't want Edwards to be able to say they were inadvertently
disclosed and must be returned i.e. inadmissible which is a lawyer's first move when his emails/work product were
disseminated. Seems different than the Rothstein emails which may have come from a separate discovery
production. Not to in anyway discourage a pretrial proactive approach, but together they are most devastating if
Edwards (not dreaming you have them) first denies the content and then is confronted with his own writings — last
night/today's
From: jeffrey E.
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 4:20 PM
To: Martin Weinberg ; Jack Goldberger ; Darren Indyke ; Scott J. Link
Subject: Fwd: Baiting to Sue
scott great work. I am very troubled by the things you have found. and have been previsouly overlooked.
not sure how we have
brad to casell emails. there must be more.
darren , if we need more reveiw help should we get
or someone else
involved. we need a thorough review of emails. this is NUTs it also has professor cassell talking a out is 4 percent and shooting
his wad,
Forwarded message
From: Scott J. Link <
Date: Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:01 PM
Subject: Baiting to Sue
To: "jeffrey E." <mailto:jeevacation@gmailcom> "
' <mailto
Darren Please Call me after you read the attached emails between Brad and Paul. Jeffrey we can talk about their content tomorrow.
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
EFTA00872905
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or bye-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
Virus-tree. www.avast.com
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00872906
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: "Martin Weinberg"
1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: jeffrey epstein [email protected]>
2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025
Jeffrey Epstein communications reveal possible DA leniency, police donations, and $1M transfer to modeling mogul Jean‑Luc Brunel
The document strings together several actionable leads: Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance’s alleged failure to enforce housing restrictions on a Level‑3 sex offender; documented cash gifts to the Palm Beach Po Cyrus Vance Jr. allegedly ignored housing‑guideline violations for Epstein’s Upper East Side residen Epstein gave $100,000 to the Palm Beach Police Department and received police‑department hats for
13p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: "Martin Weinberg"
3p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.