Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00901263DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Christian Duvernois

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00901263
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Christian Duvernois To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:49:41 +0000 It's not exactly a service stair but rather an alternative one to leave you a personal staircase to the bike parking. Both stairs will be treated with the same aesthetic attention, and therefore will be no more obtrusive to the view than the stairs to the bike parking. The symmetry of the double staircase will in fact make it look less like a "service" stair and more like an appropriate architectural feature. Furthermore, by turning the last set of stairs parallel to the road, It allows the pedestrian realm (stairs and sidewalk) and the vehicular realm (road) to be separated with a wall, which will provide a softer transition from walkway to road. If you would prefer to remove the double staircase, and instead just have one stair to the bike parking, then that is perfectly viable. Finally, with an appropriate planting scheme (low- growing, wind tolerant plants) the visibility of the final sequence of stairs from the kitchen window will be negligible. christian you made a service stair „ directly in line with the kitchen view. why? it makes no sense. EFTA00901263

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.