From: William Riley

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 9

Reference

efta-efta00905996

Pages

Persons

Integrity

No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

From: William Riley To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> CC: Martin Weinberg Subject: Re: new demand letter Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:04:55 +0000 Jeff, Do you want me to do my normal background on her? Bill Riley Rile Kiral On Mar 14, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Jeffrey Epstein wrote: wa girlfriend„ it seems that they have made a deal with him Forwarded message From: Lilly Ann Sanchez Date: Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:13 AM Subject: new demand letter To: 1reevacation gmail.com" <'[email protected]>, "Darren Ind ke "Weinbe Martin" Cc: "CHRISTOPHER E. KNIGHT" •, "Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr." Please see attached. Regards <image001.png> <image002.pngnillly Ann Sanchez SHAREHOLDER EFTA00905996 vCard Biogr_aphy Website Espirito Santo Plaza Miami, Florida 33131 **TAX MATTERS- IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. If you would like such advice, please contact us.*** ***Attention: The information contained in this E-mail message is attorney privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply E-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved <2454_00 I .pdf> EFTA00905997

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Email[email protected]

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE

EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # 5/1/2006 State Attorney Barry E. ICrischer Michael S. Reiter, Chief of Police for Town of Palm Beach Letter urging State Attorney to proceed with probable cause affidavits and case filing packages or to recuse himself 5/23/2006 File Opening Documents for Operation Leap Year 7/24/2006 Michael S. Reiter, Chief of Police for Town of Palm Beach Letter noting that Palm Beach Police Chief was unhappy with State Attorney's handling of case and was referring matter to the FBI for investigation 7/26/2006 South Florida Sun-Sentinel Article Regarding Chief Reiter's referral of case to FBI 8/2/2006 Subpoena to Colonial Bank (return date 8/18/06) 8/2/2006 Subpoena to Washington Mutual (return date 8/18/06) 8/2/2006 Subpoena to Capital One (return date 8/18/06) 8/2/2006 Subpoena to Chase (return date 8/18/06) 8/2/2006 Subpoena to Hyperion Air, Inc. (return date 8/18/06) 8/2/2006 Subpoena to JEGE, Inc. (

51p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

CHRONOLOGY OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S DOCUMENTS

13p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-ev-80736-Civ-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2 I UNITED STATES JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER COME NOW Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to file this response in opposition to Epstein's Motion for a Protective Confidentiality Order (DE 247). Epstein's motion is a thinly-disguised attempt to relitigate issues already covered by the court's earlier ruling eleven months ago (DE 188), which allowed the victims to file correspondence relating to Epstein's non-prosecution agreement in the public court file. Rather than reverse its previous ruling, this Court should reaffirm it — and allow the important issues presented by this case to be litigated in the light of day. BACKGROUND Because of Epstein's penchant for relitigating issues that have already been decided, it

20p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Martin Weinberg <MINIM>

22p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Martin Weinberg"

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.