From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 9

Reference

efta-efta00907427

Pages

Persons

Integrity

No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Mike Sitrick Subject: Re: Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:58:31 +0000 not yeti/ but maybe the op-ed should be drafted„ Dershowitz black etc. On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Mike Sitrick Jeffery > wrote: I am happy to get the full group involved, but should I be talking to Roy then about PR? By the way, I spoke with Paul Tweed today who felt the op-ed had only upside and very little if any downside. Mike From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 10:51 AM To: Jay Lacowitz; Martin Weinberg; Roy Black; Alan M. Dershowitz; Darren lndyke Cc: Mike Sitrick; Jack Goldberger Subject: I do not want to fall into the same pattern as the last time. confernce calls where I am asked to make a decision where the group , comes down equaly 50 % wholly for 50% wholly against. and I need to referee.. This is South Florida , Marie, Acosta. Ferrar„ . Roy has the best feel. He is team leader. He has the respect of the local judges prosecutors etc. He gets to decide. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00907427 The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00907428

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Email[email protected]

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein communications reveal possible DA leniency, police donations, and $1M transfer to modeling mogul Jean‑Luc Brunel

The document strings together several actionable leads: Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance’s alleged failure to enforce housing restrictions on a Level‑3 sex offender; documented cash gifts to the Palm Beach Po Cyrus Vance Jr. allegedly ignored housing‑guideline violations for Epstein’s Upper East Side residen Epstein gave $100,000 to the Palm Beach Police Department and received police‑department hats for

13p

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

For the period ending

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Reuters lawsuit alleges Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994

The passage references a filed federal lawsuit directly accusing a former president (Donald Trump) and a convicted financier (Jeffrey Epstein) of rape, providing a concrete legal filing and potential Federal lawsuit filed in California alleging rape by Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump in 1994 Email chain includes Reuters reporter David Ingram seeking comment from Epstein The suit was attached to

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Martin Weinberg"

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE OF ROY BLACK, MARTIN WEINBERG, AND JAY LEFKOWITZ ]DE94] The United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Response to the Supplemental Briefing of Attorneys Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE94). The Court asked the United States to address the Intervenor Attorneys' argument that special concerns or rules should apply to the disclosure and use of documents prepared and exchanged during plea negotiations between the Intervenors (on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein) and the U.S. Attorney's Office. The Intervenor Attorneys seek to preclude the unsealing of certain documents already filed with the Court as well as the use of their contents, and the disc

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email chain referencing a 2016 Reuters lawsuit alleging Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994

The passage provides a concrete lead: a federal lawsuit filed in California in 2016 that directly implicates former President Donald Trump and convicted financier Jeffrey Epstein in a serious criminal Federal lawsuit filed in California in early 2016 Allegation that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994 Reuters was preparing to publish a story on the suit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.