Case File
efta-efta00913900DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00913900
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
To: "Condren, James"
Subject: Re: Bear High Grade Investment CONFIDENTIAL/FOR SETTLEMENT PURPOSES ONLY
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:10:57 +0000
thanks for your view„ there are also the K-I s that show "withdrawal and distribution" amounts for hg, and"
capital contributed "for EL
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Condren, James <
> wrote:
Jeffrey and Darren, as I mentioned to Jeffrey a little while ago and in anticipation of the call that Jeffrey and I
expect to have tomorrow with Mary Erdoes, this will set forth the rationale for JPM's view that "out of pocket"
damages should be assessed by reference to the amount of an investor's initial contribution to the High Grade
fund before rollover into the Enhanced Leverage fund. Our view is based on the premise (which we strongly
believe is correct) that investors who rolled over from HG to EL did not "redeem" their HG investments.
Instead, they made an in-kind transfer of their partnership interest in HG to EL. Among other things (as
referred to below), the transaction created no taxable event for the investor, and the tax basis of the investor's
interest in EL received in the rollover was the same as the investor's basis in HG before the rollover.
The specific points we make in support of our view are as follows:
-- To effectuate the transfer of interest, investors did not have to fulfill the redemption requirements set forth in
the HG offering documents (i.e., they did not have to submit redemption forms and were not subject to the
terms of the PPM concerning withdrawals).
-- The documents related to the transaction (a subscription agreement and an interest exchange agreement)
refer to an "exchange" of interests and an "in-kind transfer of assets" from HG to EL.
-- No cash was paid to investors as part of the transaction.
-- As mentioned above, the transaction created no taxable event for investors, and the tax basis of an investor's
interest in EL received as a result of the transaction was the same as the basis in HG before the rollover.
This transmission may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure
under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or
use of the information contained herein (including any reliance
thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and
any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other
defect that might affect any computer system into which it is
received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to
ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by
JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as
applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.
If you received this transmission in error, please immediately
contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety,
whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you.
EFTA00913900
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00913901
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]Wire Ref
referenceRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02507659
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01480799
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01480628
0p
Court UnsealedSep 25, 2023
usvi details
Attachment A Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 285-1 Filed 08/15/23 Page 1 of 46 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED ) STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case Number: 1:22-cv-10904-JSR ) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ) ) Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff. ) ____________________________________) ) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ) ) Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JAMES EDWARD STALEY ) ) Third-Party Defendant. ) ____
46p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01481907
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01480787
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.