Case File
efta-efta00970057DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: Boris Nikolic
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00970057
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Boris Nikolic
To: "Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected])" <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: DialogUE 204
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 01:03:07 +0000
Attachments: BAIN REPORT A world awash in money.pdf
_ _
_
_ _
Also some interesting info re money
B
From: Chishty, Sameer [mailto
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 6:32 PM
To:
Subject: DialogUE 204
Fellow Dialogers,
Boris Nikolic;
Welcome to Breakout #204, The future of finance: Disrupting the big government/big banking cartel through monetary
financial exchanges. I'll be moderating our dialog and look forward to seeing you soon in Istanbul.
As a reminder, the context of our session is: "Fiat money is being printed by all of the major developed countries to
support unsustainable levels of public spending, undermining global confidence in the financial system. Is the lack of
sound, tradable, non-political store of monetary value a major drag on the global economy and growth? Are new
currencies (like Bitcoin) a feasible alternative to big-government/big-bank financial instruments?"
Thought I'd share a few articles to get people's thoughts flowing. Do feel free to share other pieces you think will be
valuable in the build-up to our dialog.
Here's one view on capital levels: The capital superabundance we see now has been building up since the end of Bretton
Woods, with acceleration due to computer technology and financial engineering. While central banks have been taking
extraordinary actions, some of this has been "trans leverage" (the government taking on private sector debt, as we saw in
the US) rather than a massive growth in total leverage. The buildup of capital over time begs the very interesting question
of the right level of capital for GDP growth — the market-clearing mechanism is really interest rates, which suggests
interest rates staying lower than recent historical norms on average for some time. The other question is whether we
need to "do" anything about the levels of financial assets or rather simply adjust to the new levels. Clearly these
extraordinary measures can't continue, but interesting to look at this issue from the angle of how people may be
overweighting current actions vs. long term trends. Attached is an article titled "A world awash in money".
A US perspective on public spending from Forbes: http://www.forbes.com/sites/joshbarro/2012/04/16/lessons-from-the-
decades-long-upward-march-of-governmentspendine
Nate Silver on sources of US government spending growth: http://fivethirt
ght. blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/16/what-is-
driving-growth-in-government-spending/? r=0
Short pieces on private money, including summary of Hayek's theory:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/08/23/private-currency-competition-is-the-monetary-answer/ or
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2013/03/01/rethinking-money-the-rise-of-hayeks-private-competing-
EFTA00970057
currencies/
Private money examples in Europe:
http://www.rolandberger.be/media/pdf/Roland Berger Point of view What about private currencies 20130527.pdf
An argument for stable private money backed by gold or silver:
https://www.bullionstar.com/article/private-currencies-future-money
Cheers.
Sameer.
Sameer Chlshty tTh> frit;
Partner, Bain & Company
30/F, One International Finance Centre I 1 Harbour View Street, Central I Hone Kong
tel: +852 2978 8886 mobile: +852 6893 0296 mailto:
I web: www.baln.com
EA: Ivy Chan
This e-mail, Including any attachments, contains confidential information of Bain & Company. Inc. ('Bain') and/or Its clients. It may be read. cooled and
used only by the intended recipient. Any use by a person other than its intended recipient. or by the redolent but for purposes other than the intended
purpose. is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and then destroy this e-mail. Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by Bain.
EFTA00970058
Technical Artifacts (11)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Domain
blogs.nytimes.comDomain
www.baln.comEmail
[email protected]Phone
+852 2978 8886Phone
+852 6893 0296URL
http://fivethirtURL
http://www.forbes.com/sites/joshbarro/2012/04/16/lessons-from-theURL
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2013/03/01/rethinking-money-the-rise-of-hayeks-private-competingURL
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/08/23/private-currency-competition-is-the-monetary-answerURL
http://www.rolandberger.be/media/pdf/RolandURL
https://www.bullionstar.com/article/private-currencies-future-moneyRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01853136
0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01826966
1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02689306
2p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01862346
1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02575428
2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025
Jeffrey Epstein email to Boris Nikolic referencing Vanity Fair piece on Epstein‑Maxwell alliance and hinting at financial mystery
The email contains a direct link to a Vanity Fair article that discusses Epstein’s connections to Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and high‑profile financiers (Les Wexner, Jimmy Cayne). It reinforces Email from Epstein to Boris Nikolic dated March 8 2011 includes a Vanity Fair link about Epstein‑Max References to high‑profile financiers: Les Wexner, Jimmy Cayne, Steven Hoffenberg. Alludes to pote
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.