Case File
efta-efta00987093DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation®gmail.com>
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00987093
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation®gmail.com>
To: Boris Nikolic
Subject: Re:
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 01:47:57 +0000
sorry the 12 months was nothing needed to happen if you and sharub were not there, notice it says both. please
show it to whomeever you want
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Boris Nikolic <
> wrote:
I am very much confused re your reply.
I had chance to review over 15-20 PPM in that space and all of those are very standard.
The fee to set up fund is up to 750K (Carlyle Group's is up to 1M)
Most funds are 6months to lyear no involvement - it is a standard provision (Carlyle has 160 days) - and I will
for sure push for 6months instead a year.
All of PPMs that I saw have a language re parallel funds (including Carlyle).
Management fee is 2% (Carlyle is 2.5%)
Almost all have provision of up to 15-20% in non-US companies (just in case that there is a great opportunity
abroad - something that is happening not often).
I am in SF and do not have other PPMs with me. When I return, I can send you all 15-20 and you can
compare. This one has slightly more favorable terms to investors.
Perhaps I am missing subtle legal language.
My goal is to run it through 2-3 top VCs guys when the PPM is done. People like Brook Byers who is helping
me as a mentor is one of the most experience people in the industry, Also I will run it through my attorney.
I do agree that going by myself would be much more lucrative/better. Nevertheless, I do not know if I can
raise 100M by myself.
EFTA00987093
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2014 18:55:58 -0400
Subject: Re:
From: [email protected]
To:
the ppm is troubling. early bird, facebook. . parallel funds. . 12 months no involvment. lm legal. for
nothing . invest in non u.s. cols . ? I could/ would not put any of my clients in. . they said they would not
expect it much larger than the 150? . so why not try yourself. the numbers don't work for you.
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Boris Nikolic <
wrote:
I did not like Larry's response; nevertheless, I am less suspicious re this particular case.
I am attaching you a last draft of PPM (version 25 or 26th) - nevertheless, it already changed a lot.
Attorneys went through 2 more revisions - and this draft does not include Yuri as a part of Investment
committee. He is now added back in.
And Attorneys are doing additional passes
I should have a more final one later in a week.
Talk soon
B
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2014 09:52:16 -0400
Subject:
From: [email protected]
To:
I ddi not like larrys response . makes me suspicious. plase send me last ppm
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00987094
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00987095
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01853136
0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01826966
1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02689306
2p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01862346
1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02575428
2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025
Jeffrey Epstein email to Boris Nikolic referencing Vanity Fair piece on Epstein‑Maxwell alliance and hinting at financial mystery
The email contains a direct link to a Vanity Fair article that discusses Epstein’s connections to Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and high‑profile financiers (Les Wexner, Jimmy Cayne). It reinforces Email from Epstein to Boris Nikolic dated March 8 2011 includes a Vanity Fair link about Epstein‑Max References to high‑profile financiers: Les Wexner, Jimmy Cayne, Steven Hoffenberg. Alludes to pote
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.