Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00993712DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation®gmail.com>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta00993712
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation®gmail.com> To: Vincenzo Iozzo Subject: Re: "Money is not money" Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 21:32:11 +0000 yes, read the autobigraphy of money On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Vincenzo Iozzo < > wrote: I thought a bit about this. Let me see if I understand what that sentence means: Money has no intrinsic value (even when it was linked to gold, the intrinsic value was debatable) , fundamentally the value is given by two things: I) Wide acceptance as an exchange medium 2) Trust in the country that prints the currency On top of that there's a lot of anchoring and other cognitive biases that cause the currency to oscillate in value. So in a way, money is a very simplified legal contract between multiple parties that is ultimately both enforced and backed by a nation-state (the 'trust' in the nation-state acts as the collateral). Is this what you meant? If that's the case there are a few interesting consequences: I) Paradoxically Bitcoin has more intrinsic value than nation-state backed currencies. That is because mining bitcoins require natural resources that are limited&useful and hence valuable 2) In this game (and I think by extension in the stock market game as well) deception plays a significant role. You can make a currency swing if you can mess with the cognitive biases involved in the valuation of the currency 3) At any given point in time you could replace any currency with something else as long as you can convince people that that something else is both backed and enforced by a 'greater force' (in the bitcoin case, that would be cryptography). The easier it is to explain the 'greater force' the easier the adoption of that 'something else' Now one obvious way to make money out of this would be to play the deception/cognitive bias game. I think a lot of that is made illegal by the various law against market manipulation, insider trading and what not. The question is: what is not covered? Obviously the other way would be to create another currency, own part of it and then resell it once it appreciates in value Am I making sense? Vincenzo please note EFTA00993712 The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00993713

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.