Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01001366DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Martin Weinberg

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01001366
Pages
5
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Martin Weinberg To: "jeffrey E." <jeevacationggmail.com>, Martin Weinberg Subject: Re: CONFIDENTIAL Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 18:26:47 +0000 Attachments: 3771 - Jane_Doe 1_8L2's_First_Requestior_Production_to_the_GOV_Regardinginformation. pdf See par 16-19 in the attached. Complaint in Dec 2010. I recall OPR rejected the Cassell Complaint and in some pleading there was a reference to OPRs reluctance to review given overlap of issues pending in ongoing litigation. In March of 2011, there was the Acosta letter. In Aug of 2011 there was a hearing where the petitioners say the recusal or OPR issue was mentioned. I will send you more materials as I access them. Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you EFTA01001366 are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. On Saturday, November 15, 2014 10:46 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: slomans self report was in o8 On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Martin Weinberg c> wrote: My memory is that OPR declined to investigate based on the Cassell Dec 2010 complaint finding that the complaint was the subject of ongoing litigation and that the recusal came later and was based not on Cassell's complaint but on other matters (maybe referred to OPR by Sloman, see last nights pleading and dkt 260, attached, where they refer to a separate time period in Aug 2011. We can track it down - thru their privilege logs (dates), perhaps the unsealed pleadings from last year where we first learned of the officewide recusal. I am quite certain the recusal did not emanate from the Cassell OPR complaint from Dec 2010. Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 EFTA01001367 This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. On Saturday, November 15, 2014 10:32 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: it says that the opr declined to investigate. ?? why then the office recusal On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Martin Weinberg c > wrote: The 12-19-07 letter at pg 2 references the USAO view of CVRA (referred to in last nights pleading at pg 10). See also the 12-6-07 Sloman letter also relied on to set forth the USAO position on CVRA. Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 EFTA01001368 This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of EFTA01001369 JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01001370

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainjeevacationggmail.com
Wire Refreference
Wire Refreferences

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EFTA00213642

Pi EFTA00213642 Sure "Sloman, Jett (USAFLS)" 11/21/2007 02:48 PM To cc bcc Subject Re: Crr ”. a„72.L.E.taktu;,:a Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld Original Hesse e From: Ja Lefkowitz To: Sent: e . . 2007 The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International . LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to postmasterekirkland.com, and destroy this Communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. * * * * EFTA00213643 OM EFTA00213644 JayLeDowt04ew YorkiKWManSille 11261200712:14 PM 1V214%07 02:48 PM Sure To cc Subject Re

96p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case: 13-12923

28p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:10-cv-21586-ASG Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2010 Page 1 of 3

22p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

No. 13-12923

No. 13-12923 IN THE Iluiteb Mateo Court of appeato FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JANE DOE NO. I AND JANE DOE NO. 2, 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROY BLACK ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees Defendant-Appellee Intervenors-Appellants MOTION TO DISMISS NON-PARTY INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFEE, WEISSING EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S. J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees Jane Doe No.1 and Jane Doe No. 2 EFTA00209567 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS Pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1, Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, through undersigned counsel, hereby certifies that the following persons have an interest in the outcome of this case: 1. Marra, The Honorable Kenneth 2. Acosta, R. Alexander 3. Black, Roy 4. Cassell, Paul G. 5. Edwards, Bradley J. 6. Epstein, Jeffrey 7. Ferrer, Wifredo A. 8. Howell, Jay 9. IMPIIPIS 10. Lefkowitz, Jay 11. Perczek, Jackie 12. libuilm.1 13. ra.c....

28p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-MarratIVIatthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Third Supplemental Privilege Log. The index has been marked with Bates Numbers P-014924 thru P-015267. The documents referenced in the Third Supplemental Privilege Log will be delivered tomorrow to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parte in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A. Marie Villafafia A. MARIE VILLAFAFIA Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 40

446p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48

13p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.