Case File
efta-efta01001680DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: Joshua Cooper Ramo <
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01001680
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Joshua Cooper Ramo <
To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
Subject: Re:
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 20:02:48 +0000
His reaction was "Well, revenues are down 25%. I think it would be hard for your number to go up in a year
when revenues are down. To get to 4.5 would be a very large adjustment from where we are. It would mean
taking away from other people in the firm."
To which I said: "I think 4.5 seems fair to me. The compensation should reflect who is generating the revenue.
Doesn't seems fair to me that in a year when my business is up a bit my comp goes down dramatically."
He said Henry has to decide and he'll talk with him.
Thoughts
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Joshua Cooper Ramo <
wrote:
Tks.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 1:38 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote:
i woudl just say given its 18 i think 25 % of that is fair at 4.5. if it then goes up, you hsould ask for an
addtional 25 %
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Joshua Cooper Ramo <
> wrote:
Thanks. Extremely helpful chat.
Question: Looks like the net number may go up by about 2.5 in the next week if another fee gets triggered
on a deal I started, so we'd be at 20 more or less in my business this year. But I won't know for sure for a
week or so. So if I make the call on Wednesday this week, should I say -- seems to me 4.5 is fair at the 18
number, and about 5.25 at the 20 number?
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 1:16 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote:
to summarize , 1 I have given it considerable thought , and what I think is FAIR is 4,5 .
I have
increased the percentage of the firms biz. 18 vs 24.
18 vs 26 counter BLAH BLAH< I think 4.5 is
fair.
no further explanation until later. -- but as you know reveneue are down etc. , I think 4.
5 is fair
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA01001680
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA01001681
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]Related Documents (6)
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.