Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01001680DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Joshua Cooper Ramo <

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01001680
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Joshua Cooper Ramo < To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 20:02:48 +0000 His reaction was "Well, revenues are down 25%. I think it would be hard for your number to go up in a year when revenues are down. To get to 4.5 would be a very large adjustment from where we are. It would mean taking away from other people in the firm." To which I said: "I think 4.5 seems fair to me. The compensation should reflect who is generating the revenue. Doesn't seems fair to me that in a year when my business is up a bit my comp goes down dramatically." He said Henry has to decide and he'll talk with him. Thoughts On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Joshua Cooper Ramo < wrote: Tks. On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 1:38 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: i woudl just say given its 18 i think 25 % of that is fair at 4.5. if it then goes up, you hsould ask for an addtional 25 % On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Joshua Cooper Ramo < > wrote: Thanks. Extremely helpful chat. Question: Looks like the net number may go up by about 2.5 in the next week if another fee gets triggered on a deal I started, so we'd be at 20 more or less in my business this year. But I won't know for sure for a week or so. So if I make the call on Wednesday this week, should I say -- seems to me 4.5 is fair at the 18 number, and about 5.25 at the 20 number? On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 1:16 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: to summarize , 1 I have given it considerable thought , and what I think is FAIR is 4,5 . I have increased the percentage of the firms biz. 18 vs 24. 18 vs 26 counter BLAH BLAH< I think 4.5 is fair. no further explanation until later. -- but as you know reveneue are down etc. , I think 4. 5 is fair please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01001680 please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01001681

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.