Case File
efta-efta01017358DOJ Data Set 9OtherFrom: Lawrence Krauss
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01017358
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Lawrence Krauss
To: J <[email protected]>
Cc: Lawrence Krauss
Subject: Re: Budget
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 16:50:13 +0000
Interesting.. I can help get a foothold in china with my friend Frank Wilczek, who runs an institute there on the
side (or at least runs in name only) and is immersed in their bureaucracy.. Impressed by the salaries he is talking
about, which surprise me.. It is an interesting journal.. I think it has possibilities, may be a bit eclectic and could
do with a raise in profile, which perhaps I could help with.. In any
case it is worth discussing. We can talk about this.
On other matters.. working on grievance letter.. Jim Weinstein says he believes I have justifiable grievance. RE
ABOR, consensus is that I don't have a leg.. among other things, they don't forbid the universities from having
due process before dismissal.. they just make sure it happens at least after.. I am checking with my niece as well.
Will send you the grievance draft today.. am flying to Phoenix and will actually be having 2 requested meetings
on campus so I almost feel like something other than a ghost for the moment.. I will want to submit it when
there I think.
Am flying out at 330 local time.. will be leaving for airport at 2.. and mostly free before then.
Will be interested to get your take on Inference and other things.
Lawrence M. Krauss
Professor
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department
On Nov 7, 2018, at 3:39 AM, J <[email protected]> wrote:
Forwarded message
From: David Berlinski <I
Date: Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 9:50 AM
Subject: Budget
To: <[email protected]>
Paris
7 November, 2018
Jeffrey --
EFTA01017358
Many thanks for dinner last night; I enjoyed meeting you. I think we agree on a very considerable range of
issues. My own view is that Joyce is in his completeness, a greater writer than Nabokov, and I say this as
someone who loves and cherishes Lolita. There is nothing in all of world literature to compare with the Anna
Livia Plurabelle section of Finnegan's Wake -- nothing. What Joyce had that Nabokov lacked was the intimacy
of his native language. Conrad lacked that intimacy, too, but he was an completely different kind of writer,
closer to Naipaul in his method than to either Joyce or Nabokov, and so it didn't matter.
I've attached to this e-mail a realistic operating budget for Inference for the next five years. I need those five
years to make Inference pre-eminent. Inference is a 501(C)3 corporation, of which I am the CEO. It is being
run on a shoestring of $750,000. I need another fully professional hands-on editor, and I've entered a line item
to that effect in the budget. I cannot do everything by myself. I've slotted Lawrence into the budget as an editor-
at-large, someone playing the same role as Shelly now plays. There is no reason that he must come to Paris, or
to Europe; he could work easily from whatever gloomy exile he prefers. This is the way that I work with
Shelly, and it works very well. The other expenses in the budget are those that I know from experience we are
bound to incur. There is no evading them. To move Inference into a position of dominance, I need an annual
operating budget of $2.1M. I am thus left with an annual shortfall of $1.4M, and I suspect that I will be left
with this shortfall for the next five years. After that? There is no reason that Inference might not be spun off
into another corporate format, or otherwise monetized. That remains to be done when it is appropiate to be
done - in the future.
What I have not included in this operating budget is money set aside to open an office in China. Shelly & I
have the right contacts, and I have developed some independent contacts in China on my own. I would know
just who to call and just who to grease in the bureaucracy to start things in motion. I would need SIM to do
everything that would need to be done. The China project, although important, is not as important as getting rid
of my operating shortfall.
Let me have your thoughts, the first step, I hope, in letting me have your money.
Old Hose, which I am also enclosing with this e-mail, will give you an idea why I departed San Jose State
University under a dark and somber cloud.
Best,
DDDDDDDD
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
<Projected Annual Budget.docx><Old Hose.doc>
EFTA01017359
EFTA01017360
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.