From: J <[email protected]>

From: J <[email protected]> To: Martin Weinberg Subject: Re: CONFIDENTIAL and ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2019 15:24:34 +0000 i dont have a pr expert.. i would asume ken coudl ask someone at wapo. On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 10:20 AM Martin Weinberg <=1.1e wrote: Ken advises Jay will not sign (a Kirkland issue) I have sent to Roy - but he may not review until later given his ongoing trial, we will see Ken will sign Ken advises Lilly as co-signatory. Do you want to connect with her? I will include Jack with Lilly with ? Hoping Alan has the best knowledge to get this to right person - if not would your PR expert? See attached Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 - Office - Cell This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. On Sat, 3/2/19, J <[email protected]> wrote: Subject: Re: CONFIDENTIAL and ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE To: "Martin Weinberg" < >, "Darren Indyke" Date: Saturday, March 2, 2019, 10:14 AM jack will sign On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 10:04 AM Martin Weinberg < wrote: Alan, thoughts on the best way to get this to the right Editor? Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 EFTA01032020 Boston, MA 02116 - Office - Cell This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. On Sat, 3/2/19, J <[email protected]> wrote: Subject: Re: CONFIDENTIAL and ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE To: "Martin Weinbea "Alan Dershowitz" Date: Saturday, March 2, 2019, 9:44 AM will roy sign? lilly , jay? and who exactly is it delivered to ? very well done , only issue is the 40 vs 80 9 On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 9:40 AM Kathy Ruemmler wrote: This is great. Highly recommend that we not let perfect be the enemy of the good and get this submitted ASAP while fresh and NYT Ed EFTA01032021 Board should feel pressure to publish. On Mar 2, 2019, at 9:26 AM, J <jeevacation@gran> wrote: well done thx On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 9:22 AM Martin Weinberg wrote: A very quick morning stab at a possible letter to editor.- hopefully to motivate edits, discussion, revisions, I think this route makes far more sense than uninvited Op-Eds. Also consistent with a draft being edited to be sent to Sen Sasse. The NYT Editorial is enraging in its political bias - and is deeply damaging. Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 EFTA01032022 Boston, MA 02116 - Office - Cell This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. On Sat, 3/2/19, J [email protected]> wrote: Subject: time sensitive EFTA01032023 To: "Ken Starr" < "Martin Weinberg" < "Alan Dershowitz" < "Kathy Ruemmler" "Darren Indyke" < Date: Saturday, March 2, 2019, 12:42 AM now that the NYT , the paper of record has gotten so many facts and conclusions wrong. I thought a direct response to the editorial board was now appropriate. . thoughts on more than one member of the team on the byline?. . starting with the suggestion that 5 professional criminal defense attorney somehow EFTA01032024 colluded with alex acosta is preposterous. . it was reviewed by many sets of eyes at DOJ / reference sloman letter.? . the attack on the decision to require Epstein to plead in the state.rather than in fed court . was an outcome dictated by the fact that this was a quintessential state case. A florida case of sex for money. The ages of a minority of the women actually under 18 at the time. and the govt contending with the fact that many of them said EFTA01032025 they had misrepresented their age to epstein and the clubs at which they worked. ? . There was never a sex party. Epstein does not have parties. . he had a science gathering and allegations were made that one of the women was required to have sex with academics world leaders. academics including stephen hawkings.. ? the guest list were used to accuse people of sex assault. ). President Clinton was never ever on his island. no proof , neither was al gore. . at some point a newspaper , should take a step back and in EFTA01032026 its desire to craft a story it a trump cabinet member and check its facts. ? etc. thoughts. . please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this EFTA01032027 communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE EFTA01032028 Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property EFTA01032029 of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gitn, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited EFTA01032030 and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01032031