Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01048100DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01048100
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Amy Dempsey Subject: Re: Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:11:04 +0000 >, Richard Kahn yes please On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Amy Dempsey < > wrote: I believe its on the land that he sees the difficulty, because the landing on GSJ is so far from the houses. I have all the in-water surveys done for LSJ-GSJ, Gal-Great Bay and GSJ-Red Hook. I unfortunately can't advise you on the land issues since those are really electrical engineering issues and transmission etc. We can go with what ever works on the land best. We could also do a cable from you existing landing in LSJ to the proposed landing to the west of the house where we were proposing the Great Bay or Red Hook cable come in. It just will be a lot of undersea cable. We're finishing up the WAPA stuff in the next 2 weeks and are going to be planning on submitting in May so we need to decide which way to go. If cost were no object I would definitely content LSJ-GSJ and GSJ-Red Hook that way you have back up no matter what feeder goes down or if they all do. I think we need to pin Hugo down on why he doesn't like the proposed short crossing, and what the cost implications and power implications will be for each one and then we can make a final decision so we can get this permitted. Should we try to set up a call later today for everyone? Amy Claire Dempsey, M.A. President, Bioimpact, Inc P.O. Box 132 Kingshill St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands 00851 On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:45 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: hugo thought that the lsj gsj, run , is complicated not sure why? i need to get power to gsj please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01048100 please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01048101

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.