Case File
efta-efta01070771DOJ Data Set 9OtherEye on the Market I September 25, 2012
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01070771
Pages
5
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Eye on the Market I September 25, 2012
J.P. Morgan
Topics: Equity markets have usually been right about "weak economy" rallies; Private equity investing in Asia
A lot has been written about how the recent equity rally coincided with weak growth and weak leading indicators. That's true,
as shown in the first chart. Normally, equity rallies take place when the global PMI manufacturing survey is either above 50
(denoting an expansion), or at least rising. In 2012, that hasn't happened: equities rose even as leading indicators like the PMI
remained weak. This is not as odd as you might think; since 1960, when equity markets and leading economic indicators
disagreed (i.e., rising equities, PMI below 50 and falling), markets were usually eventually "right". Only in July 1980 did
equity markets get it wrong (see table). Circumstances are different now given the fiscal and monetary issues in play, but in a
purely historical context, the latest rally was not an anomaly. The second chart shows the rise in P/E multiples over the summer.
Equity rallies usually coincide with high or rising leading
indicators, but not in 2012. Index level
1.400
57
56
55
54
53
52
51
50
49
48
47
1.350
1.300
1,250
1,200
1,150
1,100
1,050
1,000
2012
2010
2011
MSCI World
Equity Index
4-
Reduction of "tail rise contributes to multiple expansion
Forward price-to-earnings multiple
15
14
S&P 500
13
12
11
10
9
Jan-12
Feb-12
Apr-12
Jun-12
Jul-12
Sep 12
When equity markets and leading economic indicators
disagreed, the markets were usually right
4-month
4-month
Subsequent 2-yr
Rise in S&P/ US / Global
Change
Equity
PMI
Month
MSCI World
PMI index
in PMI
retum
change,
Jan-1961
15.4%
43.9
-1.5
2.1%
13.3
Feb-1961
18.8%
43.6
-2.4
4.4%
11.6
Mar-1967
12.1%
45.3
-8.4
8.8%
11.7
Apr-1967
17.0%
42.8
-9.6
8.0%
14.3
Sep-1970
10.0%
44.1
4.1
31.9%
17.6
Oct-1970
14.5%
42.4
-8.7
32.8%
22.7
Nov-1970
11.7%
39.7
-9.8
28.0%
27.3
Dec-1970
12.9%
45.4
-1.9
26.8%
24.5
Jan-1975
21.2%
30.7
-15.5
39.6%
25.9
Feb-1975
10.4%
34.4
-8.3
25.1%
20.4
Mar-1975
19.1%
31.6
-6.3
19.7%
23.4
Jul-1980
19.2%
35.0
-8.6
-9.9%
3.3
Mar-1985
10.4%
47.8
-2.5
57.3%
4.8
Jun-1989
10.1%
47.3
-6.8
22.6%
(2.8)
Jul-1989
17.4%
45.9
-5.6
7.2%
4.4
Aug-1989
13.5%
45.1
-7.1
10.3%
5.5
Jan-1991
12.4%
39.2
-5.3
26.7%
15.0
Feb-1991
20.7%
39.4
4.8
19.5%
16.4
Mar-1991
16.4%
40.7
-0.6
18.2%
14.5
May-1995
13.4%
46.7
-10.7
50.2%
7.0
Jun-1995
11.8%
45.9
-9.2
55.7%
10.2
Feb-1996
10.1%
45.9
-0.8
50.1%
8.1
Dec-1998
22.7%
46.8
4.3
4.6%
4.5
Sep-2012
13.9%
48.4
-2.2
???
???
Sources: S&P 500 and US PM! index until December 1997;
MSCI World Equity Index and Global PMI thereafter
A PhIl above/below 50 usually denotes an expansion/contraction
The catalyst for this year's rally: central banks will expand base money until economies respond, irrespective of costs we can
imagine and those we cannot. The party line from the Fed has a biblical ring to it: central bank expansion begets higher equities,
which begets confidence, which begets consumer spending, which begets inventory accumulation and capital spending, which
begets hiring. Not a lot of signs that the
To infinity....and beyond!!
begetting is taking place yet, but the Fed will
Cent al bank balance sheets, percentof GDP
keep trying (half the fun, right?), with one
45%
40%
•
ECB:+ C1 trillion for Spain Italy
Fed governor advocating monetary
expansion until unemployment is below
•
5.5%. The Fed now owns more than 25% of
35%
_ea
BoJ: announced program
all the duration in the US Treasury market.
30%
Fed: OE @ Kocherlakota 5.5%
25%
unemployment threshold
•
How does this kind of analysis affect our
••
BoE: no announced change
views on managing money? I did not
20%
to current program
expect a 15% rally in global equities this
15%
year, and thought that a high single digit
10%
return was in the cards. As a result, different
5%
kinds of public/private credit and hedge
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
EFTA01070771
Eye on the Market I September 25, 2012
JP Morgan
Topics: Equity markets have usually been right about "weak economy" rallies; Private equity investing in Asia
funds looked like attractive portfolio holdings for 2012. They generally delivered positive returns so far, although not as much as
equities. This kind of research highlights the risks of straying too far from normalized risk levels when P/E multiples are
already low, a concept we tried to build into allocations this year. A world in which the level of equity markets themselves
become a central bank policy tool, rather than being the by-product of corporate profitability, household wealth, fiscal
solvency, etc, is a world we will have to adjust to. It is not without its risks, which is what restrains us from positioning for a
world that is truly "back to normal". While I can imagine the contours of the begetting cycle playing out in the US (particularly
as housing continues to recover'), I cannot see how any amount of money-printing will solve the structural problems of the
European Monetary Union, and in particular, Spain. The Euro's problems have re-surfaced secession debates in Catalan,
another sign of the perverse outcomes of a currency union that does not fit its membership (see EoTM May 7 °, 2012).
Something else to watch: the disturbing and steady rise in French unemployment, even as Germany improves.
Another disconnect: impressive growth and lackluster equity markets in Asia, and how private equity can play a role
As shown in the first chart, economic development in Asia has continued at a rapid clip since the Deng and Rao reforms in
China and India. During the 1990's, when these developments began to impact growth and profits, investors in Asian public
equity markets were rewarded. Then in 1998, the Asian balance of payments crisis hit, and it took the region a few years to
recover (note to Europe: currency realignment played a large role in the recovery), with Asian equities underperforming the US
through 2002. Then, in 2003, Asian equity markets boomed after the region established a more sustainable model (less reliance
on foreign capital, and currency intervention to maintain export growth), and almost tripled the return on US equities. However,
since 2008 and more notably since 2010, Asian equities underperformed despite better economic and profits growth. We can
speculate as to the reasons why (the cyclicality of the global manufacturing cycle which now is centered in Asia, inflation and
excessively easy monetary policy, the exhaustion of the benefits of currency intervention), but the bottom line is that Asian
equity markets have not been a good way to benefit from higher Asian GDP or profits growth.
Structural reforms and per capita growth
Per Capita GDP, real constant dollars, thousands
9
8
7
6
5
4 •
3 •
2 •
1 fl
0
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
AD, Angus Mad di son, University of Groningen.
These trends began to emerge 5 years ago, which is when we
began to focus more on Asian private equity. As shown in the
chart, Asian private equity has outperformed public equity over
the last few years. Individual funds will of course vary, given
the concentrated positions that many private equity managers
hold. However, our sense is that being able to focus on
specific sectors may explain part of the performance gap.
What looks interesting to us is the continued increase in the
Asian middle class. This does not always benefit publicly held
companies like banks, utilities and airlines, and is sometimes
more impactful on smaller, privately held companies focused
on consumption. On the following pages, we walk through a
few transactions we have seen in Asian private equity, and how
they relate to the rise in Asian purchasing power.
Deng reforms
Rao reforms
Annualized total return in USD
1988 - 1996
1995
2002
- 2003 -
2007
2008 -
2012
2010 -
2012
S&P 500
16%
7%
13%
2%
12%
Asia ex-Japan
17%
-9%
31%
-1%
6%
China
14%
36%
-14%
-10%
Japan
1%
-10%
15%
-5%
0%
Europe
2%
24%
-5%
3%
Public and private equity investing in Asia
5-year annualized return through O12012. percent
12%
9%
6%
3%
0%
-3%
MSCI
MSCI Asia
Asia PE& VC
Asia EM PE &
Pacific
ex-Japan
Index
VC Index
I Our chief economist Michael Vaknin has written an excellent piece on the housing recovery, published on September 21, 2012.
2
EFTA01070772
Eye on the Market I September 25, 2012
J.P.Morgan
Topics: Equity markets have usually been right about "weak economy" rallies; Private equity investing in Asia
Got Milk? Safe milk, that is
First, some history: Chinese milk production quadrupled and consumption doubled from 2000 to 2007, but after the 2008
melamine scandal, consumption fell and production stalled. The fall in consumption doesn't have much to do with the market's
potential; Chinese milk consumption is less than one third the level of both South Korea and Japan where milk isn't part of the
traditional diet either. It's all about concerns related to the food supply, and the fragmented Chinese milk supply chain. The
average farm in China only has 7 cows (many being fed on kitchen waste), compared to 115 in the US and 400 in New Zealand.
Chinese milk tends to be deficient in vitamins and protein, which led to the melamine scandal (an artificial and toxic means used
by some milk traders to increase protein content). Only half of China's 16 million cows produce milk, yielding 4-5 tons of milk
per year per cow, which is what American cows produced in the late 1960's. Even after precautions and regulations in the wake
of the melamine episode, significant problems remain: in the last year, carcinogenic mold was found in milk after cows were fed
rotten silage; infant formula was found with traces of mercury; and milk cartons were found with traces of detergent. Most
reports we read indicate that shortage of expertise (e.g., trained veterinary surgeons) is a bigger problem than shortage of capital.
With this backdrop, there's a lot of potential for a company that can allay consumer concerns about milk safety. One transaction
involved the purchase of a minority share in what was at the time a small dairy farm in China. The investor's goal was to
provide both capital and operational expertise to enhance management, improve operations with tightened disease and food
safety controls, grow cow milk productivity and reduce feed costs. Over the last few years, the milk company has grown
substantially: revenues and operating cash flow have grown at over 100% annually, and the company plans to grow its herd from
128,000 to 300,000 by importing cows from abroad. The company's business model does not entail distribution costs at the
retail level: almost all the raw milk it produces is sold to one of the leading dairy product companies in China. The company
also benefits from subsidies from the government, which is anxious to improve the domestic milk supply (right now, many
Chinese consumers rely on more expensive imported powdered milk). It sounds simple, but part of the company's success has
been linking compensation with improved safety measures. Another measure of its success: annual milk yield per cow of 7.8
tons in 2012, compared to the national average of 4.8 tons in 2009.
China's milk production
Million tons
40
35 -
30 -
25 -
20-
15-
10-
5-
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Research. All I I I I I I
China's liquid milk consumption per capita is still low
Liters per capita
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
UK
US
Germany
South
Japan
China
Korea
"Does anybody really know what time it is?" Ask someone in Asia, they are likely to be wearing a watch
A lot further up the food chain from milk: luxury watches. I don't wear a watch and have never understood their appeal2, but
they are in heavy demand across Asia. In China, watches denote a cachet of prosperity, and industry reports note that 40-60
percent of the demand for European luxury watches come from Asia. A recent transaction involved the purchase of a
Singapore-based retailer of luxury watches in 2009; brands offered include the usual suspects (Swatch, TAG Heuer, Franck
Muller, Patek Philippe and Bulgari). The purchase price was at a considerable discount to the prior purchase given the impact of
the global recession and the collapse in high-end consumption, and the bankruptcy of its prior owner. Since 2009, global luxury
purchases have recovered sharply, led by the recovery in Asia (up 27% in 2010 and 2011), and by sector, the recovery in the
"hard" luxury category of jewelry and watches (up by 23% in 2010 and 19% in 2011). See table on following page for details.
2 I have never been interested in accessories like belts, watches and ties, since they are something of a nuisance, and have limited interest in
jewelry. My wife picked out her engagement ring, out of fear that I would pick something in the shape of a dinosaur or a frog. I did find
something interesting enough to buy her last time I was in France: Gustav Klimt-inspired enamel bracelets and earrings by someone named
Frey Wille, based in Vienna.
3
EFTA01070773
Eye on the Market I September 25, 2012
J.P. Morgan
Topics: Equity markets have usually been right about "weak economy" rallies; Private equity investing in Asia
Size of worldwide personal luxury market
Region
2010 vs. 2009
2011 vs. 2010
Billions, Euros
Asia-Pacific
28%
27%
200
Japan
2%
175
Americas
16%
Europe
10%
150
Sector
2010 vs. 2009
2011 vs. 2010
125 •
Art
2%
3%
100 •
Watches & Jewelry
23%
19%
Perfume/Cosmetics
6%
4%
75
Accessories
17%
13%
1995
1999
2003
2007
2011
Apparel
12%
8%
Sou ce: Bain & Company.
The company expanded its footprint to boost sales and growth across Asia. A geographical reach is important here: two thirds
of future Chinese wealth is expected to come from so-called Tier 3 and Tier 4 cities, and in India, cities such as Chennai,
Hyderabad and Pune are rising in importance alongside Mumbai and New Delhi. Certain brands (such as Rolex) are willing to
sign exclusivity or distribution arrangements with retailers, which can be valuable if the brand has enough local recognition.
The company was able to obtain distribution rights from Rolex, Jaeger-LeCoultre and A. Lange & Sahne, and exclusivity rights
from De Beers in the region. Their geographical and product expansions are all part of an effort to transform the company from
a family-run business into a larger enterprise. New pricing strategies, renegotiation of supplier input costs and greater inventory
planning helped revenues grow by 30% per year, and operating cash flow by 50%.
I would give all my fame for a pot of ale and safetylShakespeare. Henry VI: beer consumption returns to its roots, in Asia
The world still prefers beer to other spirits, and by an increasing margin when measured by volume (see first chart). Regarding
increased consumption in Asia, beer is returning to its roots: there is evidence that beer was produced in China over 7,000 years
ago, and beer was the preferred spirit at the height of the Egyptian empire. As with many Asian consumption stats, beer
consumption trails the West on a per capita basis, but has caught up in terms of volume. Last year, a large global beer company
took on several billion dollars of debt in conjunction with an acquisition. The debt was collateralized by asset sales, committing
the company to a series of divestitures. One divestiture involved an Asian beer company domiciled in South Korea. The South
Korean beer company has a storied history (founded in 1933) and now has 54% market share. Their local brands include Cass,
OB Golden Lager and Cafri, and they exclusively license Budweiser and Hoegaarden. Beer dominates alcohol consumption in
South Korea at 50% of the liquor industry. That's similar to beer-loving countries like the US, Germany, Canada and Australia,
and much higher than levels in France, Italy and the rest of the countries in Asia. Consumption is growing steadily, supporting
30% operating cash flow margins with minimal capital expenditures (3.4% of revenues). There may be expansion opportunities
outside South Korea (in China perhaps, where consumption is sky-rocketing from almost zero in 1980), but the transaction is
mostly about maximizing domestic operations.
Global consumption of beer, wine and other alcoholic
beverages in volume, billion liters
180
60 -
160
140
Beer
50 -
120
40 -
100
80
30 -
Mother East -West convergence: beer consumption
Million tonnes, through 2009
60
40
20 -
20
...
10 -
0
1961
1968
1975
1982
1989
1996
2003
0
Other alcoholic
beverages
Wine
..
........ .
.
.........
.
. rr..7
...................................
Consumption", Uesbeth Colon and Johan Swinnen. American Association of
Wine Economists, 2011.
1973
1961
1985
1997
2009
4
EFTA01070774
Eye on the Market I September 25, 2012
J.P. Morgan
Topics: Equity markets have usually been right about "weak economy" rallies; Private equity investing in Asia
The company is attempting to improve sales by focusing on growth prospects rather than just volume, and is implementing a
variety of new sales management tools (training local merchants about product and store placement, etc). These initiatives
resulted in higher revenue growth (16% in 2012 compared to 7% in 2009), 12% gains in market share since 2009, and further
penetration of southern provinces where it had been underrepresented.
With all of these examples, much of the revenue and cash flow improvement is cyclical; it will take more time to evaluate
what part resulted specifically from a restructuring or repositioning of the company. However, a good part of the private
equity opportunity in Asia was the recognition that the 2009 collapse in asset prices did not reflect the long-term improvement in
its household consumption trends, and that many companies still had good prospects for growth. At a time of slowing GDP and
profits growth in the West, maintaining some exposure to higher-growth regions makes sense to us. As per the industry data
shown above, private equity has been an effective way to benefit from it over the last few years.
Michael Cembalest
J.P. Morgan Asset Management
Sources:
"What Life For Milk After Melamine", Tom Miller, GaveKal Research, August 2012
"Global ex U.S. Private Equity & Venture Capital Index and Benchmark Statistics", Cambridge Associates LLC, March 2012
"Luxury Goods Worldwide Market Study",Bain & Company, May 2012
"Beer Drinking Nations, The Determinants of Global Beer Consumption", Liesbeth Colen and Johan Swinnen, American
Association of Wine Economists, April 2011
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates do not provide tar advice. Accordingly. any discussion of U.S. tat matters contained
herein (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used. and cannot be used. in connection with the promotion, marketing or
recommendation by anyone unaffiliated with JPMorgan Chase & Co. of any of the matters addressed herein or for the purpose of avoiding U.S. tat-related
penalties. Note that J.P. Morgan is not a licensed insurance provider.
The material contained herein is intended as a general market commentary. Opinions expressed herein are those of Michael Cm:boleti and may differ from those of other J.P.
Morgan employees and affiliates. This information in no way constitutes1P. Morgan research and should not be treated as such. Further. the views expressed herein may differ
from that contained in J.P. Morgan research reports. The above summarWpriceslquotes/statistics have been obtained from sources deemed to be reliable. but we do not
guarantee their accuracy or completeness. any yield referenced is indicative and subject to change. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. References to the
performance or character of our portfolios generally refer to our Balanced Model Portfolios constructed by J.P. Morgan. It is a proxy for client performance and may nor
represent actual transactions or investments in client accounts. The model portfolio can be implemented across brokerage or managed accounts depending on the unique
objectives of each client and is serviced through distinct legal entities licensed for specific activities. Bank. trust and investment management services are provided by JP
Morgan Chase Bank. N.A. and its affiliates. Securities are offered through I.P. Morgan Securities LW (JPMS). Member NYSE. FINRA and SIPC. and its affiliates globally as
local legislation permits. Securities products purchased or sold through JPMS are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"): are not deposits or
other obligations of its bank or thrift affiliates and are not guaranteed by its bank or thrift reliates: and are subject to investment risks. including possible loss of the principal
invested. Not all investment ideas referenced are suitable for all investors. Speak with wurJ.P. Morgan Representative concerning your personal situation. This material is not
intended as an otter or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. Private Investments may engage in leveraging and other speculative practices that may
increase the risk of investment loss. can be highly illiquid. are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuations to investors and may involve complex tax structures and
delays in distributing important tax information. Typically such investment ideas can only be offered to suitabk investors through a confidential offering memorandum which
fully describes all terms. conditions. and risks. This material is distributed with the understanding that I.P. Morgan is not rendering accounting. legal or tax advice. You should
consult with your independent advisors concerning such matters.
In the United Kingdom. this material is approved by J.P. Morgan International Bank Limited (IPMIB) with the registered office located at 25 Bank Street. Canary Wharf.
London E14 5JP. registered in England No. 03838766 and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. In addition. this material may be distributed by:
!Morgan Chase Bank. N.A. (JPMCB) Paris branch. which is regulated by the French banking authorities Auto rite de Contralti Prudentiel and Almeria des Marches
Financiers: J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA. regulated by the Swiss Financial Market SupervisoryAuthority: JPMCB Bahrain branch. licensed as a conventional wholesale bank by
the Central Bank of Bahrain (for professional clients only): JPMCB Dubai branch. regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority.
In Hong Kong. this material is distributed by JPMorgan Chase Bank. NA. (JPMCB) Hong Kong branch except to recipients having an account at JPMCB Singapore branch
and where this material relates to a Collective Investment Scheme (other than private funds such as private equity and hedge funds) in which case it is distributed by J.P.
Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) Limited (JPMSAPL). Both JPMCB Hong Kong branch and JPMSAPL are regulated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority.
In Singapore. this material is distributed by JPMCB Singapore branch except to recipients having an account at JPMCB Singapore branch and where this material relates to a
Collective Investment Scheme (other than private funds such as a private equity and hedge funds) in which case it is distributed by J.P. Morgan (S.EA.) limited (IPMSEAL).
Both JPMCB Singapore branch and JPMSEAL are regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Each recipient of this presentation. and each agent thereof may disclose to any person. without limitation. the US income and franchise tax treatment and tax structure of the
transactions described herein and may disclose all materials of any kind (including opinions or other tax analyses) provided to each recipient insofar as the materials relate to a
US income or franchise tar strategy provided to such recipient by JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries. Should you have any questions regarding the information
contained in this material or about J.P. Morgan products and services. please contact your J.P. Morgan private banking representative. Additional information is available
upon request. "J.P. Morgan" is the marketing name for JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide. This material may not be reproduced or
circulated without J.P. Morgan's authoriry. C 2012 JPMorgan Chase & Co. Ali rights reserved.
5
EFTA01070775
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Phone
3838766Wire Ref
ReferencesWire Ref
referencedForum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.