Case File
efta-efta01071289DOJ Data Set 9OtherJ.P.. Morgan
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01071289
Pages
30
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
J.P.. Morgan
US Equity Strategy
100 Ideas Levered to the Housing Recovery
Housing market fundamentals remain constructive with a pick-up in demand,
tightening supply, high affordability, low household leverage, and easing credit
standards. Taken together, we believe these are likely to be drivers of an
outperformance of equities levered to the housing recovery. In this report, we identify
100 such companies with direct or indirect exposure to housing from a diverse list of
industries — the mix ranges from the obvious Homebuilders and Building Products to
derivative plays in Durables, Retail, and Financials, see Figure 3. After more than six
years into this recovery, we believe there are few opportunities in US equities that
offer stronger growth and cheaper valuation than housing.
Key variables for housing recovery — the job market continues to strengthen,
consumer confidence remains elevated, level of interest rates remains relatively
low and risk to housing from rising rates should remain contained over the
coming quarters. We recognize housing is interest-sensitive and the Fed is about to
embark on a tightening campaign. However, long rates which matter more for housing
are already pricing in Fed rate hikes. Even if the Fed surprises by tightening faster than
what the market anticipates, LP. Morgan expects to see a curve flattening and
conventional mortgage rates should not move nearly as much as the funds rate.
Historically, bear flatteners are not associated with negative performance for housing
stocks. As shown in Figure 34, homebuilders have outperformed the market during
bear flaneners. On the contrary, bear and bull steepeners cany worse implications for
performance, underlining the importance of long rates for the housing market.
J.P. Morgan Economists expect residential investment growth of 8% this year and
7% in 2016. Despite the 63% increase in residential investment from $366b at the
bottom (3Q10) to $595b, current activity remains depressed at 3% of GDP (vs. 4.7%
avg since 1949). Outside of key macro level data suggesting significant residential
investment growth, commodities linked to housing are rising and the recent search
trends point to an improvement in homebuyer interest (see Figure 22). The following
drivers bode well for a continued recovery and growth in residential investment:
• Demand: should firm on strong labor market trends (declining unemployment
rate + expected rise in wages), high consumer confidence, stronger household
formation, and low vacancy rates. Since the start of the recovery, the economy has
created more than I I million net jobs with the unemployment rate approaching 5%.
This combined with near-peak consumer sentiment is encouraging household
formation. Due to the severity of the last recession, we believe there is pent-up
demand for housing, with household formation at a deficit of around 5 million, see
Figure 20. Also, buying vs. renting is becoming increasingly more attractive with the
median home price to rent ratio at the lowest level in 15 years, see Figure 32.
• Sum*: tighter with new and existing home inventory sharply lower. The
existing home supply declined from -4 million units at peak to 2.3m recently, which
is similar to levels seen prior to the housing boom. As for new home inventory, the
supply is even tighter at 215k units compared to 570k at last peak and 300k prior to
the last housing boom, see Figure 23. If adjusted for population growth, the current
supply picture looks even more constructive.
Global Equity Strategy and
Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
US Equity Strategy
Dubravko Lakos-BuJas AC
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Bhupinder Singh
(t-212)622-9812
[email protected]
Scott A Linstone
(1-212) 622-9970
scott.a.linstonegnmorgan.com
Narendra Singh
(t-212) 622-0087
narendra2.singh©jpmorgan.com
ArJun Mehra (AJ)
(1-212) 622-8030
alun.mehra©jpmorgan.com
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1
Industries Levered to Housing
3
Housing Stock Performance
4
Valuation. Growth. Sentiment
5
Stock Screen: 100 Ideas
6
I-lousing Macro Rivers
Derrend
9
Supply
11
Aft ordablity
12
Credit
14
Relative Valuation
15
Commodity Prices
16
Equity Fundamentals
17
Characteristics of Housing Stocks
20
Housing Basket JPAIMOUS <tides>
24
Bloomberg subscribers can use the ticker
JPAMHOUS <Index, to access tracking
information on a basket created by the J.P.
Morgan Delta One desk to leverage the
theme discussed in this report. Over time. the
performance of JPAMHOUS <Index, could
diverge from returns quoted in our research.
because of differences in methodology. J.P.
Morgan Research does not provide research
coverage of this basket and investors should
not expect continuous analysis or addreonal
reports relating to it. For more information.
please contact your J.P. Morgan salesperson
or the Della One Desk.
See page 28 for analyst certification and important disclosures.
J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the
firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in
making their investment decision.
www.jpmorganmarkets.com
EFTA01071289
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
Oubravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
J.P. Morgan
• Credit: household balance sheets at best level in more than a decade as lenders easing standards. During this recovery,
households have significantly delevered, with current household debt at the lowest level in more than 10 years and mortgage service
ratio at an all-time low, see Figure 36. Also, a higher percentage of homebuyers are likely to qualify for a mortgage loan with more
lenders easing rather than tightening credit standards. And for some, credit scores should be improving as foreclosure related hits on
credit reports cycle through after 7 years on record.
• Value: compared to most asset classes, relative valuation more attractive for housing. Residential homes sell at a discount to
equities, gold, and oil (i.e., it takes 137 units of S&P 500 index to purchase a median priced home in the US, which is a 48% discount
to its long-term median of 260 units, see Figure 39). Even after the recent decline in commodities, Homes are a cheaper hard-asset
alternative to Gold, see Figure 40.
• Risk: rising home prices to household income ratio and higher rates a concern. While the job market outlook has improved
homebuyer sentiment, the tepid rise in household income (+5% since 2010) compared to a more significant rebound in home prices
(up 34% from the low) is a risk to a more robust housing recovery, in our view. Consequentially, the new single-family home price to
household income ratio has risen to near record (5.4 years vs. 4.0 median since 1966), see Figure 42.
Also, as the Fed begins to raise rates, this could be a further negative for affordability given that every 50bp increase in mortgage
rates is equivalent to roughly 5% increase in home prices. However, we feel that the most likely scenario is a bear flattener under
which the mid-to-long portion of the curve (which is more important for mortgage rates) is less affected.
Housing stocks enjoy stronger fundamentals with domestic exposure at a cheaper multiple than the market: growth at a
reasonable price. After more than six years into this recovery, we believe there are few opportunities that offer stronger growth
and cheaper valuation than housing. In fact, if housing stocks were a unique GICS sector, it would offer the strongest earnings
growth and second cheapest valuation. Based on consensus estimates, housing stocks are expected to grow earnings by roughly 50% vs.
30% for S&P 1500 companies during 2015 through 2016. As for valuation, we believe the domestic linked housing sector does not
deserve multiples inline with the cheapest Materials sector, which has meaningful exposure to China.
• Improving sentiment implies that investors no longer view housing as toxic and there could be additional accumulation by
institutional investors. Whether you gauge the sentiment by the Street's analyst ratings or short interest, housing stocks have seen
market participants slowly turn more constructive. Housing stocks have an elevated short interest as % of float (4.6% current vs. 17%
at peak) compared to rest of the market at 3.6%, see Figure 10. The Street's sentiment has also been improving with the average
stock rating now similar to the rest of the market, see Figure II.
• Higher revenue growth and margin expansion is expected to drive double-digit earnings growth. Housing stocks on average
offer stronger revenue growth between 5-6% in the coming quarter compared to low single-digit growth for S&P 500 (ex-energy).
This combined with margin expansion is expected to drive double-digit earnings growth in the upcoming quarters.
• Significant margin expansion: the Street is expecting significant expansion for housing with net margins expected to increase from
6.4% (last four quarters) to 7.1% over the next four quarters (3Q15-2Q16), see Figure 50. Based on estimates, margin expansion is
expected to be driven by declining commodity prices while SG&A expenses are expected to rise.
• Shareholder yield now near 5%, higher than S&P 500. Perhaps due to the uneven growth and highly cyclical nature of most
companies levered to housing, the shareholder yield has been volatile. In the last twelve months, the total shareholder yield increased
to 4.7%, which is higher than the S&P 500 at 4.1%, which is attractive for yield-seeking investors in a scarce yield environment.
J.P. Morgan US Housing Basket (JPAMHOUS <Index>): a preferred way to play the recovery in housing. The J.P. Morgan US
Housing Basket is composed of a diversified portfolio of companies that have direct or indirect exposure to the US housing market
and should benefit from the continued pick-up in residential investment. Basket constituents are screened for liquidity (trade at least
$1OM ADV), and include direct beneficiaries of housing (e.g., Homebuilders, Building Products) as well as derivative industry plays
(e.g., Durables, Retail, Financials). The basket contains 65 names, and the weights are optimized to replicate as closely as possible to
an equal-weighted basket, subject to a maximum of 10% of ADV traded in any single name within a $100M basket. The basket can be
accessed on Bloomberg via ticker JPAMHOUS <Index>.
• Basket Performance: An examination of hypothetical performance shows the basket — JPAMHOUS <Index> - would have returned
+17.7% on an annualized basis over the last three years, narrowly outperforming the S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index
(SPSIHOTR Index), which returned +17.3% over the same period. The correlation of the basket to the SPSIHOTR Index is 93%, and
the recent 6M realized volatility of the basket is 11.9% (the realized volatility of the SPSIHOTR Index over the same time frame is
more than 2 vol points higher at 14.1%).
2
EFTA01071290
Dubravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
Equities Levered to a Recovery in Residential Investment
Housing market fundamentals remain constructive with a pick-up in demand, tightening supply, high affordability,
low household leverage, and easing credit standards. Takcn together, we believe these arc likely to be drivers of an
outperfonnance of equities levered to the housing recovery. In this report, we identify 100 such companies with direct or
indirect exposure to housing from a diverse list of industries — the mix ranges from the obvious Homebuilders and Building
Products to derivative plays in Durables, Retail, and Financials, see Figure 3. We recommend investors gain exposure to
housing stocks for their growth at a cheaper valuation.
Figure 1: Residential Construction as % of GDP
Figure 2: Residential Construction
Since 1949
USD billion, sear
so:o
2%
1119 1964 1959 1961 Me 1974 1979 1904 1959 1994 1999 2001 2009 2014
s)e6
A91
sera
5519
5616
$516 SSBS
95tI
3619
5196 am 3400
3210
3160 -
Figure 3: Industries Tied to Housing
See Figure 12 through Figure 14 for a full list of 100 ideas bed to the housing recovery
Mortgage/Title Insurance
Mortgage Finance
Regional Banks
Financials
Single-Famil
y REIT-As
Land Plays
Internet Services
Real Estate Brokerage
Homebuilders
4
Housing
Business
Services
Construction Materials
Timber/Commodities
Chemicals
Building
Products
Electrical
Components
Building
Electrical &
Mechanical
44
1/4 Household
Durables
Retail
Mechanical
Specialty Retail
Home Improvement
Retail
3
EFTA01071291
Duhravko Lalcos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
A diverse list of industries tied to a recovery in housing. In this report, we identify approximately 100 companies that
have direct or indirect exposure to US housing and should benefit from the continued pick-up in residential investment (see
Figure 12 - Figure I4 for a full list). As shown below, the housing plays range from direct beneficiaries of housing (such as
Homebuilders, Building Products, and Land Plays) to derivative industry plays (e.g., Durables, Retail, Financials, etc).
The housing plays that we identified have a combined market cap of $592b and represent 3% of total market. As shown in
Figure 5, these companies offer significant sector and industry exposure.
Figure 4: Sector Breakdown: Housing Composite
Figure 5: Industry Breakdown: Housing Composite
P4 Mt
Kyr
144
Lei Mee.
Pelynan•
WO companies. equal-weighted
44efla
Technology, 2
Median
MC*
I
Miley
I Wawa
OD n
TIE
1Tr
an
1.14344fteCtetes
25
1331 111 1125
lib
01%
45%
•53%
Say Peak
1
1413 la
3124
24.04
.11,4
41%
•1241%
Dana
SW
1134 Mb let
a
a
411%
VI4ten313, 14
an bee hien' ri.es
lilt
alb VP VA
a
a
'7%
Ronk ;WS
7231 It*
2434
la*
4%
42e4
•14%
twee/
4,1)4 Ilk
1434
1144
-17,4
4%
PC%
hen
2344
1274 1625
lib
4%
43%
ail ,.
Tow: too
Rad Elianingan /Cod
Companke
Re
7244 3134
9134
1%
I%
pit 1114,2%**Faao
2111 141 Mb
It
22.1%
4:1%
41414
Cak033.424114
1331 1234 4/34
I*
*a
41%
•11,4
Pare 4423012243:5
1234 tik 4Th Ha
4%
•11,4
•21%
Tel% Covreed Deena
3.141 21k 24/4
21*
44%
*II%
43%
Ens
SW lit
NA
13.24
41%
45%
42%
Industr4I3 24
Mums 60444
SI
. ISA Ilk
43%
4,4%
4a
114323444grear
100
11.44 lb
Mb
*7%
al%
A%
0442441
3*
2141125 21*
Oa
414%
II%
Pere &Cato WY
3311 1St $34
Kb
a
.12%
4b:
ituatiOnict
SR 1St Rh la
41%
431%
4%
1.4424*boul. Sassis
4314 110h
. lit*
a%
AS%
4014
5:409
2712
a
fl u
lib
.44,4
.41%
OM
A lost decade for housing equities. Over the last ten years, housing stocks have sharply underperformed the market due to
poor demand (low household formation) and excess supply (foreclosure homes). As shown in Figure 6 below, the peak to
trough decline for housing stocks was -89% (similar to Nasdaq composite decline).
In absolute terms the recovery in housing stocks has been strong (+374% from the bottom vs. +218% for S&P 1500), but it
is still 47% below its all-time high in 2005. We believe housing stocks are likely to outperform the market over the next
several quarters due to stronger relative growth and cheaper valuation, as discussed in the next section.
Figure 6: Performance: Housing Composite vs. S&P 1500
Figure 7: Performance: Annual Performance
Indexed
me
xe
293
to 100 on 1/1)2000. equal-weighted
Housing Composite
Annual, absolute and relative to S&P 1500
Absolute Pedormar
442%
428%
.311%
WS
.4%
.52%
41%01%
.14%
- +1% os
-1% 49%
-17%
200
-50% -51%
150
Relative to S&P 1500
103
47% nn *X% nn
42%
K2%
441%
OS
13%
50
58P 150
■
Wi%
4%
41%
1Mr
47%
41%
-32%
0
.51%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2001 2005 2006 2007 2006 HOG 2010 2011 2012 201 2311 2015
90 91
'02
TO
DO
'C6
'06 17
18
TO
10 11 12 13 14 IS
Scurce:J.P. Morgan. Blocrnberg
EFTA01071292
Duhravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
Growth at a Reasonable Price? After more than six years into this recovery, we believe there are few opportunities
that offer stronger growth and cheaper valuation than housing. After multiple years of undcrperformance, housing
stocks trade at a significant discount to the market even with stronger expected growth than rest of the market.
• If housing were a unique GICS sector, it would offer the strongest earnings growth and second cheapest valuation.
Based on consensus estimates, Housing stocks are expected to grow earnings by roughly 50% over a two-year period —
this is stronger than the organic growth sectors (Healthcare and Technology) and the lower oil price beneficiary
(Discretionary). As for valuation, the multiples are as depressed as Materials, which is tied to the slowdown in China
while housing is largely a domestic play.
Figure
Housing
35.0a
30.0a
8: Valuation: WE (2016)
Figure
Housing
475%
*SO%
9: Expected Earnings Growth: 2014-2016
AD%
Stocks vs. SAP 1500 Companies
Stocks vs. S&P 1500 Companies
25.0a
2ux alto
425%
dim
41% 4.y. 437% +a%
422%
413%
+31%
241.5x
20.0z
IDS
.0%
4%
ish t5b
14.04 %Is lib Mk 111.1% aW
15.0z
I
.25%
47%
lot
.50%
" 44 Ji
nn/
41 4/
te
r
st,
41
41
0 ,771"/
iDe
Improving sentiment implies the sector is no longer toxic. Whether you gauge the sentiment by the Street's analyst
ratings or short interest, Housing stocks have seen improvement in sentiment by market participants. Housing stocks have
higher short interest as % of float (4.6% current vs. 10-Yr median of 5.0%) compared to rest of the market (3.6% vs. median
of 3.4%), see Figure 10. The Street's sentiment has also been improving with average stock rating now similar to rest of the
market (Bloomberg Mean Rating: I= Strong Buy, 4= Sell). This implies that the sector is slowly normalizing and less
likely to be viewed as toxic by investors and could see continued accumulation.
Figure 10: Investor Sentiment: Short Interest as % of Float
Figure 11: Street's Sentiment: Average Stock Rating
Median
Median
1t0%
ID
--
Hewn; Co-post4
Homo; Crpost4 red=
—saPI500
IS
SW 1930 sedan
20
25
30
35
1t0%
140%
12.0%
10.0%
10%
10%
4.0%
2.0%
0.0%
110
117
2 '03 to IS 16
Undemerfsesia
—SIP 1500
S&P 1500 neap
'07 %II 99 10 11 12 13 14 15
DS
111
'02
1.1 '111 t6 -06
117 to TA 10 'II
11 13 14 15
Source. JP. Maslen. BIcemberg
23
24
5
EFTA01071293
Quhravko Lalcos-Eujas
(1-212)622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
Equity Plays Levered to Housing Theme: in the tables below, we identified housing-related stocks levered to a pick-up in residential investment.
Figure 12: 100 Ideas Levered to Housing Recovery (continues to next page)
Price as of as of 8/12/2015
GCS 54cte1.6..8)
nIZZCZTIONI
S" W'
Chenkit
I
2
3
4
s
8
7
8
Contlivellontlawitlx
9
10
II
Pea å ~I
Products
12
13
14
— Er=lillieleS
441011
Atrotpue 4 Oanst
15
0:«59,)
IF1.11.1>AX,90~51:n
TOW
tawny SW*
Ma Nil (%l
al Ce901.1
Techrialt
WU Eillmalt
Villoill0.1
Cvnrt
P6P)
524*
Ifhph,
10.4
Mutt
Cep
Am)
Vol
Owl
124,c4
Crone
VTO
141019 7~1
Te/5.1
Prat
OM*
51,01
Avg 11$241147~111
is % et
ASI I=441 Stck LOA
Oil 34087 5•1.4 %ItiCt
54191
Grate.
NW
EPS
0.4411
N111
EN
MITOA
LIM
PIE
NW
Pal
PC,
YNN
Wa"
Aks
—
—
$3.178
$31.0
9%
0%
——
10%
3%
ID
31
14%
5%
it%
1234
172a
24z
5%
Industry. C44.44414
aentn.‘14a-r8 Corer/
BuiOng/449P34
WesItCroncåC<t3tacr, 1140rp *rat
Vabou CAwalAi
1340r0 409,04
RP1.11.41~.1 Ix.
&tarp *rat
satoket*ooconterromeaciformbfor,
Pc150ne ~alp,
&tarp Ltienit
44.51Cators»n
13.40r0 409,64
lens 9.5r114.4e. Pc
&40rq/44enit
Indt$113: 6~ 1~
ItIn 1
Nall 144-414144en14 Irc
Burdlil /Alt/at
DP War" bc.
EkidrulAiltr“
ItellAfllS FOXPOZIas,
&Id Mittat
lipluary: F444111 Foreu Produces
10.4~1..494tCOrtenton
&ilk.) Willa
SpieCascra C4
Kildtg Dahlia
Piic int. CP40(9134
Tints
S1413
11L1(
WA
RPM
WO
POL
MS
/290
1.4.11
DP
NW
LP%
BCC
DEL
—
$273.17
92.93
8336
515.03
561.61
33151
12103
$7.95
—
517211
$5391
521.19
—
516.39
131.35
81.37
—
290242
9553
91172
52,03
8953
41,32
5875
la
—
1/3,103
10964
all
—
1902
4421
70110
53317 5193 -
525262 51761
$8368 5511
56482 5105
56398 DU
51.039
$18.4
usei sa2
52907
$25.7
$937
513
47906 $130
$11457 $1432
44.154
SE6 9
$1.545 $120
$1.110
68.4
52317
SO 7
$1260 $130
$517
523
-3%
-7%
31%
3%
.79%
1%
7%
-7%
6%
4%
23%
5%
.iis .os
-34%
43%
.47%
40%
46%
43%
35%
55%
-9%
8%
93%
40% -..
0%
-14%
20%
-2%
13%
-14%
6%
4%
——
N
Jellog 1 Zakaustzt
OR Jellotlataalze
N JertJaVanN4
N Jellotlataalze
ON at.) allanU4
N Mkt J 201441.16
——
——
10%
4%
26%
10%
.4%
8%
0%
—
—
2%
2%
1%
5%
3%
2%
5%
3%
3%
2%
6%
2%
2%
44
48
43
45
44
61
a
35
26
10
01
55
61
31
39
33
3.6
4.1
34
4A
34
30
42
3.9
4.1
44
10%
69%
IA%
54%
04%
—
62%
—
—
1.4%
09%
—
—
4.4%
0.0%
05%
—
4%
1%
0%
6%
9%
4%
1%
—
3%
18%
19%
18%
II%
1%
14%
9%
—
15%
a%
.10%
13%
10%
12%
11%
—
72%
119%
81%
33%
212%
16%
- b .
3%
—
at
17.38
Ilk
1138
1328
1158
142*
104x
1028
1144
1638
14.38
1238
928
NA
828
2198
1St
334
222* 334x
lax
261
154x
754
1714
4.b
16.9x
5.8«
lilt
3.74
14.8«
0.8«
831
1.2*
233i
354
252*
2/4
1B lx It
214 14.14
121la
24z
6364
22«
1551
2.44
Nit St
4%
4%
4%
6%
6%
—
3%
5%
—
2%
3%
—
—
7%
4%
1%
—
2%
16%
3%
3%
44
50
41
44
34
2.7
4.7
—
~nib
lodusty: ~044~8 Wait
lailllll Pt«) Irtlult/411,Ille
KM/WM 01/nil
NM(
—
—
RIJN
—
—
at
1.2744
56112
5557
$224
$111
118
5%
4%
14%
4%
25%
as
—
1%
3%
411
3.4
23%
4%
3%
—
11%
IS
—
11.14
1128
554
16.48 Lk
1St az
NA
164
I%
1%
—
—
13%
3%
6%
411
61
41
—
3.4%
—
IttIllif.2 PttGuCls
14dutirp: Butlag Products
—
—
$1411
$73
42%
a%
——
6%
3%
57
4.4
a%
12%
31%
13.36
2124
4.04
4%
16
IlllE0Cl(Walln
SUWON:4i%
MS
527.03
27117
$9321 51661
48%
22%
OW late« lithut CFA
14%
3%
65
39
35%
-9%
19%
1128
20 24
NA
6%
I?
icetne Bert Hunt & Scarp. &Mfg Precits
AVIS
$4311
5037
$7.947
5612
31%
10%
N Wind Nan CPA
4%
4%
61
3.9
23%
17%
77%
lea
21.3«
3.
3%
18
414001PIC
Boks-08»ctiza 6 kwae•tel +/LE
933.07
604
56051 $109
23%
14%
1%
55
42
04%
4%
20%
174x
19741279*
4%
19
LeIllail blill.knil ht.
Outrp Elen”.$ 4 MeCINTC41 LI
flald 12773
$5.438
$54A
42%
21%
C« C.Sthen rut RCM
-17%
4%
67
40
93%
6%
31%
14/18
2350, 9414
4%
20
A O. So*C01:010”
IN.46-06»dics8M.0~.41 WS
WM
77/45
35301 $335
50%
24%
2%
50
40
1.7%
12%
26%
1574
20Ax
4.3x
4%
21
Oa* Corn%
13.3rpPrecits
oe
54342
47.21 u.a4 5714
32%
26%
N Wind Nam CPA
6%
3%
58
3.7
09%
9%
18%
948
17.51 It
3%
22
MG 0110(8511
B415,0N4A
U50
531.70
32•25
54.833 3513
20%
14%
N ~RS«
CM
3%
3%
66
3.4
02%
8%
29%
IAN
1634
9.7S
5%
21
AmairoWy111rdusres.Irc &Mr° Proclact
AW
95751 Wu
53.179 5390
18%
12%
N Mead Nan CPA
1%
8%
56
34
(IX&
2%
I%
11.5«
223
4.2*
1%
24
Weexi8Pwrelone10,44
BL03,0~<6
DOOR
565.33
7342
32025 $150
13%
9%
6%
46
43
-
-
-
193*
31.1.
Us
-
25
Camp/Six.* ScelYa8L11.
BuNrg Pecan
CM
$53.46
12(45
MD 511.7
24%
.10%
CM lAdnel Fan CPA
30%
3%
18
43
OA%
18%
15%
IA« lilt
59,
0%
26
troc.n Mertlearin, CO. Pt 61818,01.85811$
550
1)566
3921
$1.774
185
19%
4%
3%
57
33
-
7%
18%
1128
24.4
20x
-
2?
&Men FrpSo.rce.irc
Bul3rpPrccbct
41.1X%
$14.18
BPS
51.572
$12
144%
III%
5%
59
40
0.1%
12%
119%
2938
29.114 299*
0%
a
7,9.. Cwt.' y. Irc
6j1:1,0Pttla
TREX
541.32
5531
$1.316 $121
48%
-2%
9%
41
3.4
02%
12%
21%
1698
21.54
Btx
4%
a
Ulunti Fat, PIMIalS. lx. &MN Precixt
OPPI
93261
8041
51.267
14.7
44%
18%
3%
6)
43
OA%
10%
22%
9.18
1St It
5%
30
Ars~xlm"Cososio, &of re Nadi
NSW
56117
8143
$1.039
58.7
117%
58%
3%
6.
42
05%
15%
32%
94
23.04
4.5.
3%
31
Pry Gan1631,43. It
&MN Precim
PGD4
514.03
ILI
$957
326
49%
1%
N SWIM Attu; C74
7%
3%
58
43
OA%
le%
915%
lax
1534
NA
4%
32
011.:nCnionbn
8dIfripx<14$
OFF
517.22
1011
MI
RA
61%
30%
7%
56
35
8.7%
2%
48%
9.74
165*
1.0x
4%
Becklcal E~al
Sultry: IIKIrltd Equipment
-
-
gra
$11.3
41%
4%
-
-
1%
42
3.4
21%
0%
it%
13.94
1134
211.
1%
8
C.~Ill 01114Corpowi:n
Boks-gEbusw&Mxtetsi
BCC
1,6.18
22511
$789 3130 _ -27%
8%
8%
42
33
-
-
-
332,
129*
234
-
J.P.Morgan
6
EFTA01071294
Dubravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212)622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
Figure 13: 100 Ideas Levered to Housing Recovery (continues to next page)
Price as of as of gi12(2015
34
35
35
sr
30
tC
*tte?0Al
tnce,
1PMW.6np Omaitakn
TO4r
CagnY Stab
Price Pal N
JP11Coverag9
Teclnkb
NES Estimates
Verbs
O07011
R1/44
52
Ill.
Los
Mg
4.30481
WI
cap (nn)
124nel
Chem].
vii, limn' 44,144$1
ragM
Rbe
14.034,
Slot
Avg Reg Raparchasa
88%O
RS I • 50 51461114
Gal 3Way 5.19,4 %Warp
Sac
000
NW
En
0400
NT11
EN
193r11)11
LTM
RE
NTY
AB
PCP
YNY
sate.: Baton*
IlacItinory
pato": Nacilinity
Surkylllack4 Cott Irc
Bddry Elemcd 6W:bra
410fOicn CO•00n1k40
&4618)(11441441)thrtil
taco Irc
Bddry Elect/ A /.14.0%rcal
Y,W11Y404 Wm:6W* Hu C6 Bade° D)(114414 Rothrt411
Begs & tan armalon
Balrg Etind a Alshrcal
SW
NDSN
OGG
On
BOG
-
-
HOLM
174.35
11217
557.11
$1465
-
-
11979
84(87
11033
85141
2111?
42175
$30.5
sues 5224
Ma
11190
$4.520 5171
14.139 yea
31.586
511.7
$515
$74
9%
-4%
20%
-I%
4%
-4%
0%
0% ...
-10%
9%
4
.11%
-11
.10%
-
-
-
-
N Mend tau. CFA
10%
0%
10%
3%
4%
3%
3%
4%
6%
19%
13
45
50
42
52
93
44
35
3.7
36
35
34
36
35
14%
31%
23%
55%
56%
25%
04%
5%
1%
2%
7%
1%
-4%
6
11%...1284
10%
15%
2%
8%
11.46
11.34
Ilk
lit
1434
1194
1724
$6146
084
*84
2014
21.84
1114
Lid
VA
lb
514
614
224
lb
5%
9%
7%
6%
9%
5%
1%
'Dating Ceepsnin & ClIst4tolndutlry: Testing townies II Dilrbakn
-
-
52.147 5251
a%
-11%
-
-
4%
11%
43
3%
7%
10.44
at
It
9%
83
rurm.ee.
BuIcIrg El'andalacnrcal DSO
11850 13104
$3.464
$252
43%
20%
N C.StachentsalttFA
.14%
2%
57
35
-
1%
17%
14.54
2124
414
-
45
&ow. 15x/na So;41). rn:
5‘113,0P%43.116
RCN
345.17
3923
$1.172 $178
29%
28%
170144 CFA
2%
66
3.7
00%
8%
51%
14.14
215.
214
4%
Some: Consumer Disc mho Sate.: Consumer DIsattonan,
-
-
32322_3343
13%
13
4 4 444444444 444444"SC
'44
Nei
Q Q P.- el
Q Q h
.1 P.- Q Q Q Q w Q Q P.
•
I
ti 8719CIAMtplar..51EIT2EWInSCI:ROIA
gg4g:
4 O.
:JR gega
t.,`
4 4
7%
17%
1114
1184
3.114
5%
_
Mouaead Durablt
Induatry. Houtaho15 Doable.
-
- ----12730
$451
a%
12%
-
-
3
1
23%
1334
149.
244
0%
4I
144.1,441-0.7tes Irc
Bo deg Prctts
LW
$203.30 2034120 515.146 11385
61%
32
OW Otte' Ream CFA
17%
12%
24%
16.44
1124
134
2%
42
115118MOnoni0A
IturnIo1.10tralita
11HR
$112.11 2171140 513.446 5163.7
20%
-11
1.ktetIRtnst, CFA
10%
8%
29%
1014
1204
274
4%
43
DA. Koren. irc
Ibreetukke
WO
WM
30119
sio.ms $1038
41%
Id
N Mead Ream CFA
.1%
It%
25%
II*
110*
It
7%
44
Lean C0,10,810.1014314
Itnitylin
LEN
551.13
$1136
$8949 51630
42%
15%
OW WISP Renart CFA
4%
23%
17%
Ilk
14.14
214
7%
45
PatotaIrc
Hortatukt
HIV
120.40
23417
$1.260 $1172
Id%
.4
UW LkInd Brat CFA
1
II%
7%
10.34
1414
It
11%
45
T011tate4.1ct
14)01)(0344
Ta
539.22
Mt
58105 $953
19%
13%
VW 1.4000144614 CFA
-11
20%
19%
143*
15.14
1.74
6%
47
Usti & Rat IrcoTaratd
5.3rg Prctri
LEG
$47.71
61,23
$6525 $480
45%
12%
6%
16%
1114
21.14
619
4%
48
1.511.1‘
Itaitolyer
61911
51.51192152341051 $6143 $425
34%
N
1.40001449404 CFA
-11
20%
35%
1014
1594
419
5%
49
Slardad Pads Cap
Iteenulke
SPF
kW
90
$2426
$01.1
Id%
13
NA Lkluel that CFA
28%
36%
1214
122*
IA
11%
50
TRINE* GIcu01,4
Itnitowr
TPH
571.49
17113
52391 sae
10%
-3%
98%
78%
24.14
107* It
-
51
RItr4Gro4.1r4
Honnunte
RYL
14413
6030
WS $102
83%
13
NA 1.441.41 that CFA
17%
15%
1021
11.44
It
14%
52
Ve111916o*60Y10•414r.
Itaity114(
MTH
542.33
5022
51.111 5230
13%
20%
UW 14440014494•4 CFA
1%
24%
32%
1444
10.44
1.54
9%
53
U.D.C. HAIN% tc.
Honetukt
MCC
129.52
3121
$1.441 $233
9%
II
UW I.4chad that CFA
28%
72%
202*
14.34
1.84
a
54
NB none
14)1*(0344
584
$1528
11112
51.413 804
4%
-7%
N
1.44100144614 CFA
-2%
34%
71%
3524
1214
094
10%
55
L4203nt Inaarp:raled
Rad
L2B
5840
2919
$1275
III
19%
.7%
9%
23%
104*
At
144
2%
93
Ellin A6n 111141,11nC
Rat
E1H
E/345
3323
$930
$88
34%
-I
8%
25%
83*
11.14
244
-
57
61trn 44n tam Ons A
'brava*
YIN
12414
27117
$603
It.?
2%
SI
CM Wind Rabat CFA
0%
20%
121%
1434
964
EN
-
55
Tag Cr MOPS 9n)C440 044314344)146144
TWO
18.01
21115
WO
375
12%
8
OW MONO Nu% CF A
10%
17%
-8%
1644
*6
044
-
0
*a annuli.* Ire
Hateatuat
WIG
$24.21
8417
KW
$3.1
13
N
PAchad Rabat CFA
4%
X%
30%
1444
1544
IA
9%
co
mown. In
Itnglii314
1.165)
524.54
26119
809
350
21%
8%
N
1441100174604 CFA
-1%
23%
47%
113*
1114
1.24
12%
61
Deans Hums USA. hc,
Horretulke
BM
11/19
21114
$561
NA
II%
.12
N
PActnel Attu; CFA
4%
27%
135%
Aix
91.
1.14
-
32
La Itn6i. ht
Potrotol7v
LOH
524.67
25112
086
$41
34%
64%
OW MOW Rffist, CFA
5%
43%
61%
BM
tat
20
-
63
Caron Connone7 Ire
ittlitillke
GCS
$20.93
2314
$449
325
10%
8%
N lAchaelAthat. CFA
4%
93%
94%
NA
St
1.84
-
64
Nen Hone Ca, In:
Potrotol7v
HMV
$13.98
1913
$230
308
7%
-4
MOW RHINA CFA
0%
104%
229%
8334
14.
1.54
1%
65
It.mn a- Ent;n7n, n:.CbssIttlito11H
HO?
$1
411
$217
$3.7
a%
a%
N IMrod Rthat. Cf A
19%
51%
MU
184
RA
17%
Olsintoton
Industry: DIPalt. ars
—
—
San $340
1
14%
2%
03
34
1.5%
4
18%
lit
119*
2.74
5%
93
PON C4440•41:n
ROI
POOL
$70
7
31435 5147
11%
3%
53
34
3
8%
15%
1594
2294 1194
4%
Went 5 Caulog Relall
lidualh: Intrae 1 04464.3
WI
—
—
$66511 $153
27%
17%
—
10%
00
4.2
4.3%
17%
19%
1174
2644 1104
4%
67
KW Ix.
RaW
HMI
$42.93
BIS'
$1335 MB
14%
.11%
4%
38
45
0.7%
6%
12%
1244
1664 293.
6%
Source. J.P. Mcocal. 8lcanberg
J.P.Morgan
7
EFTA01071295
Duhravko Lalcos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
Figure 14: 100 Ideas Levered to Housing Recovery
Price as of as of 8112/2015
Company Ws
Prloo ParlEll
IPE Cortwo
WNW.
14415 WNW
ValuatIon
52.311
449
Tor
9ww
MO*, No:Wm
SON
EPS
Ea
Covell
NW
11.514%
Vol 12.rot
POE 41%a
RE I r GE SW LW
Orora WAN EWINI
PE
FCF
GCS SWAKLOY
0/ °WV
$4111wca044563444
TON
*a
la
Cap IwO Own].
YTO 14044 AWE
WW1
cki scow S. Out %WC.;
1451/
NEI
AEI
ME
PS
VW
teNNIN RES
Indslty 3WGIN RENO
—
—
$8231 MI
li%
4%
—
—
It%
T%
4$
3*
22%
6%
15%
103
1114
3.111
1%
f8
Mao Wol It
NW
HO
$11749 11913 5152176 $405
46%
12%
ON GYactio/ Nowt CFA
1%
I%
58
42
II%
6%
19%
124x
a
16.64
5%
II
WA Conents In
NW
IOW
$4847
73*) NEAT LEIS
45%
1%
ON [townie, 74:nn. CPA
21%
1%
51
44
43%
6%
31%
11.h *IN 0*
5%
70
OW 040 tOwoN cric
NIIN
tw'
144*
8341
$10327 31451)
1%
.10%
N °none, 7I:n4w. CPA
3)%
I%
37
32
211%
4%
0%
7* II*
428
6%
71
WaanrSawws 1c
NIW
VCS4
WIS)
0707
37410
$810
26%
14%
ON °none, 7I:n4w. CPA
76%
5%
03
40
21%
10%
18%
10*
223E
044
4%
72
REtcralto Harlon Helfros IF1414
RH
55440
KG70
534% 952
22%
4%
23%
M
43
00%
25%
48%
17.E
27.2a
SM
1%
73
*maxim.
Ws
AAN
411.15
3323
52.:31 436
41%
22%
5%
El
43
-
12%
19%
Inc
14.75 Its
-
74
Races Fools*. CCIPINII %:430'
Hy
12266
2600
1.150
120
0%
1%
2%
93
50
04%
7%
19%
87. ISE
1.74
6%
Sorter Column Su • tot
Sector Conswer Shpin
-
-
$11462
4414
IT%
(1%
--
3%
54
El
12%
3%
0%
13.7a 1th 344
4%
No.4.:40 Poogry
Ind•rhy Wnoheld Products
-
-
MAU 01.4
21%
5%
--
11%
3%
U
34
V%
t%
6%
1106 Mk
7.11
4%
C4 trot Guttn& Nitforiso CAM
CEIBA
f11.33
117
WI
SIB
21%
19%
3%
E
37
-
Soucy F
OS
Swot NEWEL
-
13414
1234
11%
2%
-
3%
SI
3/
6.5%
T%
9%
17.13
%Ix
136
5%
84n6 6
InOrsuy 8.418
-
-
MU 1132
15%
I%
-
-
IS%
3%
St
35
02%
8%
12%
19.33
14.43
1.54
5%
/6
F nt RNA. c Bps
Ro(cui Boris
FRC
WIC
ISIS
11117 WI
371(
23%
ON SkocAle0401. CFA
E%
2%
SS
37
OA%
17%
14%
NA
17.N.
2.1.
6%
IlvIllo & NerIptor from. IntIssav 1104 4 11c09s96 Gnaw
-
-
11210
HO
16%
II%
--
4%
5%
Si
*A
52%
I%
3%
2454
1744
t3a
7%
77
RENA On. Pc
craw
RON
116 33
1St)
53125 WA
45%
UM
11%
51
44
53%
.3%
.4911
MA Ilk
1A4
IS%
78
MSC %%Oros Coscralcn
Crave*
PTO
ME
127
33715 1625
46%
IT%
14%
49
39
00%
6%
6%
MA
ILE
3.06
14%
79
WahoSAILEco Kt
Froroa Swoon
VO
12402
2413
$743
169
76%
39%
2%
42
34
62%
7%
3%
92( aft
Ma
9%
60
literrew. Pc.
troorte
MGT
WE
2416
$191
525
25%
29%
5%
49
4.7
-
25%
41%
NA
4.46
1.14
-
Eturance
Incluctlr 14."'"
-
-
*Mt USA
35%
I%
--
I%
2%
SI
33
42%
4%
4%
13.14
1614
1.3.
11%
61
Fry Incur Fntrcol Cpitret Iowa
FAF
WS) CO
41.418 5)12
SN;
10%
6%
01
35
00%
5%
11%
NA
14.44
tic
IS%
62
01514(4.0C WWII Caw: canna
OM
$1610
17113
41.116
$210
16%
14%
1%
03
43
-
1%
3%
144
14.14
SU
-
63
Cwroth Fharcial ix Cua A renew
WON
1.527
145
$2.646 1410
40%
.38%
N me/ sans,. cm
71%
1%
32
37
00%
.1%
.b•
144
4.4,
0.26
41%
IA
Sloarilittrairi. Stow Cap canto
STC
41012
42.127
9902
SSA
36%
KO%
2%
SS
38
-
4%
II%
144
LIA•
14.
-
LS
Kitts% htutnrel1P352t. bc how.
IIRTG . 11948
27/I4
$151
$11)
42%
3% .
3%
43
48
-
-
-
NA
414
134
-
RIP !slit/ IcreOwl butItInclalry 11441tEllelmodcw Tina (RIM
-
-
$3210 MAI
9%
-.I%
-
-
I%
2%
*
WI
OA
I%
I%
47. 77.4
2.1.
4%
IS
Nytnansp Cacao/
tlitrf
WY
$3356
37/33
515.842 $1035
.2%
.14%
N
703.1 twor
174
2%
46
38
39%
5%
32%
1173 Mk Lb
4%
IT
PArn WE Lola Canon( lc tlita
PCL
$11155
4609
17234
$415
0%
3%
ON T(131 larcbl
RE
6%
51
35
14%
.1%
16%
21E
124.
AN
6%
68
Anotan Hous1Roll Ciro A SinshIantawn
MIN
$15116
11W6
$1.312
5200
.14%
.6%
ON Asto%PasIsitCFA
21%
2%
41
45
—
29%
149
29E
Sp
1.06
—
IV
Potttr Cconeticr
Trettr
POI
31625
4453
31421
373
45%
.18%
2%
4
34
00%
9%
-2%
1th
24.7,
?A
-23%
K.
Stroto)tlowretRonSnIsfirt$.54(.1trrERSit
SWAY
31505
2553
4976
514
-2%
-2%
I%
SO
45
—
50%
-151
10a1
3464
ON
—
II
$4.0 84, With InwIeot
SK/P1erEPEIT
SOY
31632
WAS
WS
WA
1%
-2%
ON AdwirPatnt.CSA
23%
3%
51
30
?A%
—
—
744 2/644
Us
3%
92
NurtotRN.CalaiRtooW 15%16.Fart RUT
WI
117.50
91/17
VAG
SIS
4%
.1%
7%
E
39
—
—
—
36.1x
Nog
tki
—
93
AGE: Ototonc:Forenp/ SNE.Fac1( RUT
IMF
11714
WM
$550
114
A%
.2%
11%
M
—
SI%
—
—
11135
NA
IAA
11%
RNA WAN /.0449tmerl 8 DOntlintryt Reel Eslale Nanagarorl 8 DepWard
—
—
$4312
22:14
11%
3%
—
—
16%
2%
SI
42
42%
11%
20%
11(13
33.14 3*
4%
E
AWN /WISP URI
Reel f fl y POttope
PLOY
34338
&WO
34328
$58.8
17%
4%
ON Attowkwbw.C4A
I%
3%
U
38
MO%
9%
45%
14(0
MIA
2.16
7%
56
54 .1” ClICl/5
Winter
XE
317.58
23)15
31.510
SO
-24%
4%
IA
0)
30
MO%
—
-151 231.4a 705344
17.
0%
14
Tic, AGOG,.
Ls/40V
TRC
12311
3124
$511
$11)
.13%
-10%
2%
4
-
-
-
-
Oh
NA
116
—
97
NOW *saws. Ix
INa Era Swoop
MAU
$3867
4121
WI
529
33%
14%
N
0sto%Paalsse.CFA
.5%
4%
03
41
00%
3%
9%
4.7% DA
204
13%
BS
;NNW
Irc
Tr/SAW Rs
FM
313.9)
20,12
3415
135
-14%
14%
*I
42
—
11%
46%
NA
*SA 06
—
Seclor:Inka•340 Techmalegy
—
—
/till
$223
10%
3%
A
40
LS
I%
12%
1126
17.11
2.8.
4%
Inlerrel Wows 6 Strelras Money InkmolSoltsvni II kakso
—
—
SUM 317.3
WA
0%
——
II%
3%
5?
II
14%
14%
11%
1564
Mix
321
3%
14
24/w GaxeFOns A
r.ww.flraws
2
SU 49
I4439
$3,303123 4
-14%
41%
38%
))
35
00%
43%
16%._
744 131.14 I*
—
SOW*
Incleilly: Wow
_
—
—
$1.454
$353
21%
It%
_
—
—
—
54
3%
SI
Al
2.4%
9%
10%
ISM
2134
4.7z
4%
133
FE We CorpoW
RAW( Satce
FICO
WO
9363
12329
SISS
59%
NM
4%
93
46
611
711
MI Inc nu
7.1.
5%
J.P.Morgan
8
EFTA01071296
Oubravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
Macro Drivers: Demand, Supply, Affordability, Credit
J.P.Morgan
Housine Demand: firming on strong labor market (declining unemployment rate + rising wages), high consumer
confidence, improving demographic trends (household formation), and low vacancy rates
•
The US economy has now entered its 371° month of >100k job creation. Since the start of the recovery (3Q09), the
economy has created more than 11 million net jobs with the unemployment rate approaching 5%.
•
Wage inflation has a positive spill-over effect on consumer outlook and housing demand. The decline in the
unemployment rate is likely to push real wage growth and fonvard expectations higher (Figure 16).
Figure 15: 58 Straight Months of Job Creation
Figure 16: Wage Inflation Now Beginning to Respond to Lower UE
Since January 2008
BLS Employment Cost Index
noce
s
101.1 -
The economy has added 3.7 milhan jobs
5M
since the Man of the franclaterisis
0.1
4M
al I
.24
-4/4
EM
-10M
II III
Combine enroll Change
tk
3001.
Monthly NoMann Payroll Change ' 030k
4%
Ida
- 4130k
230k
Ok
400k
430k
-100(B
0%
2038
2009
2)10
2011
2012
2013
2014
9315
mu 2013 mu mis
ECI Compensation Groat,
&KAM 1204 Sense Miocene
2003
2004
2305 2008 2007
ELSMarar Hasly Earnings Groath
2008 2009 2010
2011
•
Both University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment and Conference Board Consumer Confidence are confirming
robust consumer sentiment—holding near best levels seen during this expansion.
•
Homeowner and rental vacancies are sharply lower. Due to the severity of the last recession and tighter credit
compared to prior recoveries, rental vacancies rates have declined to the lowest levels since the mid-1980s. The
homeowner vacancy rate declined to 1.8% from a peak of 2.9% as the excess foreclosure supply was initially absorbed
by all-cash investors and more recently by first-time homebuyers.
Figure 17: Consumer Sentiment and Confidence Strong
Figure 18: Homeowner and Rental Vacancies Low
Sentiment indicators encouraging
Rental vacancies at lows not seen since 1985
120
12
- 10
Ikea
!Vacancy
110
a
nri;
100
A
Rental Vacancy
2.5
• 93.1
90
\I
902
0
1%.let)
L 20
ao
Mchgan Consume. Sentiment
30
I
C8Constmee Cenederce
20
2003 2004 2035 2003 2007 21308 2009 2010 2011 2)12 2013 2014 2015
6
10'91 92 `3314 95 ,3617 98'93
9
EFTA01071297
Dubravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
•
Even prior to the Great Recession, the household formation trend was under pressure due to declining
affordability. And after the start of the recession, this trend accelerated as the unemployment rate for 25-34 year olds
surged to over 10%, Figure 20.
•
This resulted in a decline in headship rate with a rising percentage of 25-34 yr olds living at home with parents.
As the memories of the last recession fade and the availability of jobs and rising wages improves overall confidence,
this population group could be a significant driver of household formation.
•
Household formation remains significantly below the long-term trend with a current "deficit" of 5.2 million
households. As noted by JPMorgan Economists (Rental demand continues to soar), the recent household formation
trend has been more encouraging: "Household formation had been unusually weak through the first several years of
the expansion, growing at only about 0.6% per year or half its pre-recession trend. But the number of households,
measured as the number of occupied housing units, surged in 4Q 14 and has held a stronger trend through the latest
reading. The number of households in 2Q14 was up 1.1% ar and I.4%oya."
Figure 19: Headship Rate Down as Young Adults Live at Home
Figure 20: Household Formation Below Trend Since 2005
25-34 yr olds
Millions
20%
125
Total US Households
18%
18%
14%
Lk* In Parents
Household
12%
0440
10%
8%
47%
.5
'91 16 16 17 18 19 110't'02D3Ili116 1:43 1)7 08 08 '10 11 '12 '13 14 15
19
*4
IS
14
/9
SI
19
11
59
14
1)9
14
nag
De
Ion from trend
!!!!!!!!
Beloserend el formai=
AhoveerendHHIonnodon
•
Demographics support an increase in housing demand over the next 15 years (2015-2030). A pick-up in younger
cohort of the working age population (ages 25.49) as a percentage of total working population (ages 25.64) is
projected by the UN, see Figure 21. We seem to be at an inflection point in housing demand since the younger cohort
is more likely to drive housing formation.
•
Google Searches confirm similar improvement in housing trends. Based on keyword searches such as "Buying a
Home", "Title Insurance", "Home Price" and "First Home", there has been a pick-up in interest for all things housing.
Figure 21: Demographics Support Increased Housing Demand
US population ages(25-49) I ages(25-64) projected to increase through 2030
—USPcpdalonagell25493hrsl25-54)*
74%
72%
70%
039%
86%
64%
62%
CO% "§§"§§§§ilifIMA111111;
Figure 22: Google Searches Confirms Similar Trends in Housing
yfy trend
2019
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
10
EFTA01071298
Duhravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212)622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
Housine Sunnily: supportive with months of supply and starts/permit activity well below historical trend
•
Existing and New Homes for Salc and Months Supply rose for several years before peaking at 570k ('06) and 12.2
months ('09), respectively. Since the peak, however, the months supply has decreased sharply to levels seen prior
to the housing boom.
•
New home sales lag existing home sales. Prior to 2006, new home and existing home sales grew in lockstep.
However, during this recovery, homebuilders have continual to favor construction of larger homes over the $150-200k
entry-level due to lower profitability of this segment. So far, this first-time buyer demand is being fulfilled by existing
homes rather than new homes. Some homebuilders have responded to this demand, but due to costs (in particular land)
the new home supply for entry-level housing is usually in the outskirts.
Figure 23: Supply Has Tightened to Pre-Boom Levels
Figure 24: Sales Recovering but New Home Sales Lagging Existing
New single-family homes
Single-family homes, millions
70CA - —
14
1.6
50Gt •
• 12
1.4
7.0
Ensbng Home Sales
6.0
1.2
1.0
042/0
Hama
le
400t
far Sa
Q`11)
a
0.0
300k
6
0.6
COCA -
200k
4
0.4
2
0.2
100k •
Ot
0
to
SO*9112,339.116 93 97'95'999011 M113 W051)61/7 11611610 •
10 '9112
SPAS
9819*C0111/2 '031:11 06126 67 Vol '0? 10 1112131415
SOMA: J.P. Morgan. ROAN Assocaeon of Realtas and Census Bureau
•
Housing Starts and Permits have risen steadily during this recovery but the activity remains well off peak levels.
However, the current housing starts remain well below long-term historical trends, especially if adjusted for growth in
population or households.
•
During this recovery, multi-family starts have been more robust than single-family with the decline of home ownership
rate. In fact, last month's strength was driven almost entirely by the multi-family segment which is currently
expanding at the fastest rate at any time since 1990 while single-family starts/permits are well below historical levels.
Figure 25: June Housing Starts Above Consensus...
Figure 26: ...But Strength Driven by Multi-Family
000s. saar
Dark = permits, light = starts
250CIt
—r
2.0:0k
■
1
1.
1A00k
SlajeFanili
1.
obi Housing Permits
1.200k
1.CCOk
90919293'91 95 93 97 99 99 90W 921k1 124 .05 *C6
1:13 '0910 1112'1314 IS
931112 93 W95 SG '97 10 '93'00 '011213314 65 YAW DO '0910 11'1213141S
Sarce:J.P. Morgan and Census Bureau
11
EFTA01071299
Duhravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
Housine Affordability: homes still affordable compared to long-term but rising home prices and higher interest rates
over last two years is pushing affordability down. Strong job market and rising wages should continue to be a
support.
•
The Homebuyer Affordability Index has declined for all and first-time buyers over the last two years due to rising
home prices and higher mortgage rates, see Figure 27. It is worth noting, however, homes remain affordable when
compared to long-tom historical trend.
•
We believe a continued improvement in job outlook and a meaningful pick-up in wage inflation could help stabilize
and potentially reverse the recent home ownership trend, Figure 28.
•
As shown in Figure 28, the homeownership rate has declined from recent peak of 69.2% in 2004 to the lowest level
since 1967 to only 63.4% in 2Q15 as households favor renting over owning. This decline has more than unwound the
increases during last decade's housing boom and brought the homeownership rate to its lowest level since 1967.
Figure 27: Homebuyer Affordability Index
Light = monthly, dark = 1yr avg
0
90 91 92 939415 9 97 99 991011 132 Mgt WIG 97 TS to 10 11 12'13'1415
Figure 28: Home Ownership Rate
Since 1965
70%
Ea%
63%
67%
66%
I
65%
60%
63%
at%
1916
1970
1975
1900
1965
Scurce:J.P. Morgan and Census Bureau
1900
095
2000
2006
2010
MTh
•
Home price appreciation has leveled off since rising double-digit in 2013, but the recent —5% yly increases in both
Case-Shiller and FHFA indices remains significantly above wage growth, see Figure 29.
•
The increase in the ratio of median existing home price to median household income since 2012 reflects the fact that
home prices are rising faster than wages — a trend that is likely not sustainable over longer time period. This metric
looks worse for new single-family home prices to household income, which is near an all-time high, see Figure 42.
Figure 29: Housing Prices Showing an Upward, Albeit Slower Trend
Figu e 30: Declining Affordability
Since 2001
Existing home sales
20%
2504
15%
10%
5%
0%
40%
.15
Case-Shiner 20-City Composite
2001 2002 2009 2000 2'305 2006 2007 2009 3309 2010 2011 2012 2019 2011 2015
War Home Price
gay • away. Sack • fp my
1504
1001
t0 VI '02 93 be
OS
013
97
138
119 10 11 12 13 II
Scurce:J.P. Mow. Census &reau and Bbcoberg
15
5.00
450
2.00
12
EFTA01071300
Dubravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
•
When adjusted for inflation, home prices remain 20-25% below previous peak levels. The Case-Shiller 20-city is
26% below and FHFA HPI is 19% below last cycle peak in home prices.
•
Buying vs. Renting most attractive in last 15 years. The median price to median rent ratio has declined to an all-
time low of 263, compared to peak multiple of 390 and average multiple of 329.
Figure 31: Home Prices Remain Far Below Peak Levels
Price decline even lower after adjusting for Inflation
MAW
0%
.71%
.14.3%
NOS HPI
Case-Shun
20-City
.203%
.30%
Figure 32: Home Price-to-Rent Ratio Reflects Rental Bubble
Median
400
$1,200
*Wan Prke to Medial Rem
360 W..
(111
SMOG
300
$1.051
250
NSWPM
WOO
200
SAO
150
3700
100
so
MOO
0
6400
'00 '01 12 13 04 16 16 17 19 19
0 'II
12 13 14 15
•
Affordability impacted by incremental rising mortgage rates. As shown in Figure 33, 30yr fixed home mortgage
rates for conventional loans have risen roughly +50bps since 2012 to 3.90% while Jumbo rates have risen by roughly
+39bp to 4.29%. Every 50bp increase in mortgage rates is equivalent to a 6% increase in home prices.
•
Despite the pick-up in mortgage rates over the last two years, the absolute levels remain low compared to long-term
average and even compared to post-recession levels.
•
Historically, bear flatteners are not associated with negative performance for housing stocks. As shown in Figure 35,
homebuilders have outperformed the market during bear flatteners. On the contrary, bear and bull steepeners carry
worse implications for homebuilder performance. underlining the importance of long rates for the housing market.
Figure 33: Fixed 30Yr Home Mortgage National Average
Since 1999
90%
•
8.0%
7.0%
t0%
SO%
40%
31%
Figure 34: Rising Rates Not Necessarily a Negative for Housing
Homebuilder performance during rate cycles since 1991
% Maths Avg. Ann. Ret Ann Stdev
IR
'Bear Flatten&
31%
4%
23%
0.11
Bear Stepener
18%
-12%
21%
4.50
BJI Flatter
22%
28%
23%
1.21
BIM SEepener
28%
4%
29%
4.21
Rising 10-Ye a•
51%
-13%
25%
-0.53
Felling 10-Year
49%
19%
24%
0.70
Rising Shut Rates
49%
-2%
22%
-0.09
Feting Short Rates
51%
9%
27%
0.33
SoJrc*
P. hivgai ant 81ccenberg
13
EFTA01071301
Duhravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
dubravko.lakos-hujasQpmorgan.com
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
Household Leverage and Credit Standards: households delevered balance sheets; banks easing credit standards
•
Household balance sheets at best levels in more than a decade. During this recovery, households leverage has
continued to decline as % of disposable income and %of GDP, see Figure 35. Also, the debt service ratio (payments
as % of disposable income) is at the lowest level and still declining, see Figure 36.
•
The sharp decline in household debt metric is likely due to declining homeownership rate, write-down of bad
mortgages, and rising disposable income.
Figure 35: Total Household Debt Low, Capacity for Higher Leverage
Figure 36: Household Incomes Can Support Higher Debt Payments
Total Debt as % of...
Payments as % of Disposable Income low and declining
150%
.
td
115% -
100% •
Ncosehold Debt as 'b
ID%potae Income
41
Household Debtas %of GOP
'90 91 92'93 9t'% 9317
'93 8011 82 1331111513517 13819 1011 '12 '13 14 15
6
lcUl ht( S.
hketme Debt Seevke Retie
.
.
.
•
•
•
.
*90 81 12 13 1415 '93 '97 '93 le DO 1111293W 161117 88 1910 1112181115
•
Banks are easing credit with the senior loan officer survey indicating favorable trend in credit. As highlighted by
J.P. Morgan Economics, the latest report showed that a larger share of firms cased lending standards over the past three
months and firms reported stronger demand.
•
Lending standards should continue to improve with further decline in unemployment rate, higher wages, and low
household leverage. Also worth noting, the mortgage refinancing cycle (4Q08-2Q13) is likely behind us with the Fed
expected to begin raising rates sometime this year, see Figure 38. In this environment, banks are likely to increase
focus on new mortgage originations, which should support the housing recovery.
Figure 37: Easier Credit a Positive
Banks reported 11% net easing
93%
93%
AO%
30%
20%
10%
0%
.10%
1)7
Easing
14
'09
10
11
12
'13
15
Net % et Banks Tightening he Prise Moehinies
ih0
II,II! MBA Purchase indette
I I
I i ,1 rll ! I
i
-
-
•
-
•
-
•
•
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
_
•
-
-
-
•
_
-
_
_
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Source J.P. Morgan. MBA and Federal Reserve
Figu e 38: Fed Liftoff a Concern for Mortgage Rates
Blue shaded = rising rate cycles
1250
10%
1050
8%
79)
6%
go
4%
2%
0%
90111213'9036'9317,3899'0011
0313C05138'07XIBW101112131415181718
Sauce: JP. Morgan. Federal Reserve and Freddie Mac
CO.
keitms Rae Ay
14
awe
mew
""
1514
..231c•
*Ste
Fiedit Myr
commtment rate
Fed F
Fed Fwd.
14
EFTA01071302
Duhravko Lalcos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
Relative Valuation: as mentioned earlier, residential housing is one of the few investments remaining, which trades at an
attractive valuation in our view. It trades at a discount to equities and Gold. However, a tepid rise in household incomes
would likely keep new home prices from rising too sharply.
•
Relative to Equities, Homes more attractive. Currently, it takes 137 units of S&P 500 index to purchase a median
priced home in the US, see Figure 39. This represents a 48% discount to its long-term median of 260.
•
Even after the recent decline in Gold, Homes are a cheaper hard-asset alternative. Even with the recent decline
in Gold, homes remain a more attractive hard-asset than gold. It currently takes 240oz of gold to buy a median home
compared to long-term median at 332oz.
Figure 39: 137 Units of SW 500 to Purchase a Single-family Home
Figure 40: 240 Ounces of Gold to Purchase a Single-family Home
Long-term median: 260 units of S&P 500
Long-term median: 332 oz. gold
600
500
!
!
700
1.0:0
BOO
400
coo
T Homes Espana/ea
700
S&P 500 Cheap
600
500
300
LT won 260
400
200
300
137
300
100
100
j Hoosschno
SIP 500 EANOSNO
-
•
2006
2011
1956
1971
1976
1961
1936
1991
1996
2001
1966
1971
W6
1961
1965
1991
1956
2001
2006
2011
392
240
•
Oil inching towards parity with Housing. With the recent decline in oil, it is becoming increasingly more attractive
vs. housing, see Figure 41. However, housing is still a relative bargain given that it currently takes 4700 barrels of oil
to buy a home vs. long-term median at 5,400, see Figure 41.
•
Risk to housing: tepid growth in household income. The S&P Case Shiller Home Price index has risen 34% from its
low, while the median household income has only risen 5% since 2010. This divergence helps to explain new home
purchase price to household income ratio rising back to near peak level of 5.4yrs compared to LT median of 4.0yrs. A
significant pick-up in wage inflation could help push this metric lower or if more homebuilders decide to build more
lower priced entry-level homes.
Figure 41: 4,700 Barrels of Oil to Purchase a Single-family Home
Long-term median: 5.400 barrels of oll
20a
to
161
la
Ia
it Hones Expeosrat
dl C'e*
6c4nes Clreso
Oi E.7501'*
1905
1971
1976
MI
19.65
1991
1995
KO1
20:6
2011
Figure 42: New Single-family Home Price to Household Income/Yr
Long-term median: 4.0 yrs of income
7
6
5
4
3
2
1 .
1966
1971
1976
iiu
1 IL
ISM
1966
It Haws Euenshe
nre .11N
NixnesCneW
name lign
5
LT Medan 4C
1991
1996
2001
20(6
2012
15
EFTA01071303
Duhravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
Commodity Prices: commodities linked to housing are rising. While we acknowledge most commodities are widely used
outside of residential housing, a notable change in housing activity nonetheless should impact these commodities. We
selected the following commodities to monitor the health of the housing market: lumber, gypsum, cement, and aggregates.
•
Though steel framing has become more popular recently, an overwhelming majority of new homes constructed
continue to rely on lumber for the shell / skeleton. Lumber prices in the US have risen 9.5% above last cycle's peak.
•
Drywall installation generally occurs toward the end of home construction and thus lags housing starts and therefore
demand for Gypsum is more closely aligned with housing completions. Gypsum prices made a new all-time high in
February of this year, capping a 56% rally since crashing 32% in '06-07
Figure 43: Lumber
PPI
mo
aro
1
1.!
P L
I I
itallon-adj
aro
ti'•
t
:
zso
%A.
`1.
Q
4`,..
310
150
100
60
0
65
70
75
10
15
Figure 44: Gypsum (principle component of drywall)
PPI
350
A rl
303
Irk
innatiabakyi
350
foe'
i s"
iv
in :
210
V
wigr
150
100
actual
60
0
10
IS
10
15
10
15
70
75
03
15
90
15
10
15
10
Source. J.P. Morgan, BLS anakomberg
•
Pouring a home's concrete foundation is one of the first steps taken in constructing a new home after site prep, grading
and installation of basic utility footings. Concrete is a composite material prepared on-site from cement (10-15%),
water (15-20%) and aggregates (60-75%).
•
Cement prices, which took six years to recover since pre-crisis highs, continue to move higher reflecting broad-based
demand from global construction. The cost of aggregates, which never declined during the crisis (partially due to
infrastructure related expenditures), continues to move higher with the pick-up in residential and non-residential
construction.
Figure 45: Cement
PPI
I
Figure 46: Aggregates (crushed stone, rock and sand)
PPI
350
300 •
250 •
200 •
150 •
100 •
60
actual
0
0
15
70
75
10
15
SO
15
tO
OS
10
/5
70
75
10
15
90
SS
10
15
10
16
EFTA01071304
Oubravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
dubravko.lakos-bujas©jpmorgan.com
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
Equity Fundamentals: Double-digit Earnings Growth
J.P.Morgan
Stronger Fundamentals for Housine Stocks: 5-6% revenue growth and margin expansion expected to drive double-
digit earnings growth. Full-year estimates have been revised down, which is setting up beats for rest of the year.
• Stronger sales and earnings growth: housing stocks on average offer stronger revenue growth in the coming quarters
compared to low single-digit growth for S&P 500 (ex-energy). This coupled with margin expansion is expected to drive
double-digit earnings growth in the upcoming quarters.
Figure 47: Consensus Revenue Growth vs S&P 500 ex-Energy
Figure 48: Consensus Earnings Growth vs S&P 500 ex-Energy
Quarterly Growth Rate. yhr
14%
Estuaries it—tbusrg Sixes —S&P SOO (ex-Energy)
1
Quarterly Growth Rate. y/y
50% -
40% -
10%
30% -
a%
20% -
D
6%
CP
6%
at ma at ell.
10% .
"S
"I r
.. a -... ,...—
. -.0 ..,
4%
0%•
•
0%
3/11
9411
3512
Source J.P. Morgan. Factest
9112
3113
9.113
3714
WA
1,15
9115
10%
-20% •
3111
9111
3112
9112
3513
9113
3114
9:14
3:15
915
ssrretey-O—Hou
Stocks —S&P 500 (ex-Energy)
4
at
t.
at "a
•
t
c
c
ag a
A
"-et
'0
•
Significant margin expansion: the Street is expecting significant expansion for companies linked to housing with net
income margins expected to increase from 6.4% (last four quarters) to 7.1% over the next four quarters (3Q15-2Q16).
Based on estimates, margin expansion is expected to be driven by declining raw material prices while selling and
administration expenses am expected to rise slightly in comparison, see Figure 50.
Figure 49: Net Income Margin
Quarterly
14.0%
12.0%
MO% --...---r--
------'--- P ---
R
----
it ,, -- — - -
el
at
g ci
at
,.: N at G
8.0%
IC
ae ae
«It r • I... &re
at e
ae
-a ,. u:ke
C a_..': ...0
'A tet
4° 'Ai
•
-o- d
6.0%
e to — ----
..,
q
. ea.;
vl
4.0%
or
Emmaus
2.0%
•
—0— Housing Stooks
—
S&P 500 (ex-Energy)
Figure 50: Net Income Margin Drivers
S&P 500
INA Other
OSA
SOU
COGS
0.0%
3/11
9/11
3112
9112
3113
9/13
3/14
9114
3/15
9/15
4
sHousing Skein
17
EFTA01071305
so
Dubravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
•
2015 earnings revised down by 5% over last six months: As shown in Figure 52, the Street has sharply revised down
2015 estimates over the last six months. This is likely setting up easy beats for rest of the year as residential investment
picks up in the coming quarters.
Figure 51: 202015 Earnings Revisions, Last 6 Months
Figure 52: 2015 Earnings Revisions, Last 6 Months
Housing Stocks
110
Honing Blocks.R2
1/28
2/27
329
423
528
627
7/27
Housing Stocks
105
103 -
e 101
1
89
97
95
;
93
a a 3 89 -
87
85
128
227
329
4,03
528
627
727
waif
•
Sharp earnings beats seen in 2Q15 likely to continue into YE. 70% of companies in the housing composite beat on
the bottom-line with an earnings surprise of +7.7% but the quality of beats was poor with more companies missing than
beating on the top-line.
Figure 53: % of Companies Beating on Revenue and Earnings
Housing Stocks
60%
3 • 60%
3
•
40%
20%
47
48
56%
46%
—
40%
201430144014 0152015
Revenues
70%
201430144014 0152015
Earnings
Figure 54: % Revenue and Earnings Surprises
Housing Stocks
12.0%
9.0%
6.0%
EL 3.0%
at 00%
.3.0%
.6.0%
1.3%
0.1%
43.6%
43.81.° -1.5%
-1.3%
-1.5%
-3.0%
7.7%
20143014401410152015
20143014401410152015
Revenues
Earnings
Scarce: J.P. Morgan. Factsel
•
Strongest growth seen by housing stocks within Industrials and Discretionary. Similar to S&P 500 sectors, the
strongest surprises were delivered by housing-related Financials.
Figure 55: Earnings Report - Housing Stocks
202015
i% Surprise...
% of Companies Beating...
201SEUended &oath Pike Performance
Ran.
Earnings
Revenue
Earnings
Reponed • Est
Bottom-up
.1
Cos
Rep
Taal
CO3
% of
Cos
Rep
Sales Earnings
Growth Growth
0.61/
(Yen
Avg
Avg
Avg
Avg
host
oast
(Lag
neu
405)
2015
40s)
2015
405) 2015
40si 2015
Saes Earnings
Sn:e
SDay %
Garth
Growth
sold
Alter-
(Val
(Ye?)
swite Reperang
Housing Stocks
82
10)
82%
58%
14.0%
0.0%
-15%
-12%
72%
49%
40%
53%
70%
St%
11.3%
1.4%
-0.2%
Mamas
12
14
86%
3.0%
11.7%
43%
48%
-14%
-2%
37%
25%
44%
33%
25%
10.6%
.C8N
45%
Inistak
22
26 85%
-LS%
19.9%
-1.3%
-2.5%
-16%
10%
35%
36%
49%
81%
18.5%
4 7%
14%
DISCteknes7
26
31 76%
14.0%
25.4%
0.6%
01%
1.1%
8%
57%
42%
55%
70%
7.7%
13A%
26),,
Finance
23
23 87%
29%
-5.5%
0.1%
-1.1%
-104%
15%
57%
50%
63%
75%
29%
-5.5%
.35%
-3,1%
18
EFTA01071306
Dubravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
•
Strongest Consensus Earnings Growth by Company: the figures below show next twelve months earnings growth for
housing stocks, sorted from strongest to weakest. About a quarter of the housing names are expected to deliver >30%
earnings growth.
Figure 56: Strongest WY Earnings Growth (Next Twelve Months)
Sort Highest to Lowest
Figure 57: Weakest Y/Y Earnings Growth (Next Twelve Months)
Sort Highest to Lowest
My Gem Hddires be
935%
_v 20%
Meg on PLC
Haubsters bc
242%
I
10%
Tel Brothers Inc
New Home Co IndRie
_229%
I
19%
Home Depot kW%
Bakers FreiSource mc
139%
I
10%
Aeon's Inc
Bearer Homes USA be j
138%
I
19%
Masco Corp
Mein Lyon Haves
121%
I
18%
PolyCine Corp
Century Communities Inc
94%
I
18%
Pkrn Creek Timber Co Inc
Hornanen Erreanses Inc
81%
I
18%
Seamen Manulacbreg Co Inc
TRI Po/me Group bc
18%
I
18%
Ryland Cox( edge
kWh Maeda Weals Inc
76%
18%
WIllans-Sonome re
HOC Holdings Inc
73%
ihoncd Woddwoe de
72%
17%
Web» Inc
KB Hans
71%
17%
Leona Corp
101 ~we Inc
66%
16%
Leggsti 8 Rat Ire
Saesart Inbrmata Senecas C
54%
16%
Boggs 8 Seaton Cap
15%
Caesarbone SØ-Yam Ltd
Beacon Hooke Supply lx
50%
15%
Not093n Corp
Resloracn Hardare Hobres
48%
15%
Pool Corp
Gaon Corp
48%
1.81 ~Ire
47%
15%
Hearty Ferran Cos Inc
14%
First Republc BenbtA
Forester Group bc
46%
13%
Valsper Carr%
Realcgy Holångs Corp
45%
12%
HSN Inc
HcmeStbe bc
41%
12%
Scone MadeGro Cabe
Zikr4 GroL9 tic ~M
41%
11%
Rrst hearken Financel Cap
Far Isaac Corp Je.~
37%
10%
RPM Imainseonal Inc
9.adard Nxr6c Corp
35%
10%
Stanley Black 8 Deck/ Inc
"
Yc)0~1
3.5%
Eagle ktateseis be 1~
sa%
8%
Auretrang Wald Irdusbes Inc
8%
Watts Water Techndogies Inc
Weyerhaeuser Co JOEM 32%
Mabee Hemet Corp
32%
7%
PubeGroup Inc
Arnadcan Woodmark Corp
1%
Boise Cas:ade Co
6%
Bed Bath &Before Ire
Lore's Cos mcJ~il
31%
7 6%
MG1C inresiment Corp
Lennox intemetknal
.p~.
31%
WO Communities Inc I~
30%
- 4%
RET~HceInge Inc
3%
CadRepublic Inarnabonal Cor
USG Corp
20%
Omens Comng
28%
3%
Wager 80srlap Inc
Future Brands Herne d Security r~
27%
Grace Inc
AU SmithCorp 1~1
26%
-2%
Pena:heard
Wheenol Corp
26%
-6% t
Tailor kbrrson Home Cap
Eden Men Mews Inc 1~
25%
-10%
Wes!~ °embed Cap
DR Hotta, Inc ir
25%
Rattan Group Inc
Shenvel-Wesms Ca% 1=
25%
-TN
American Homes 4 Rent
tai-Boy tic j —
23%
-08%
SI Joe Colhe
Whale Indus:des re
23%
—146%
Lcusare-PactIc Corp
Unhand Forest Products Inc
22%
-214%
k
Tres Co inc
21%
430%
Germain firehoa tic
Slarwood Vispolni Residential
19
EFTA01071307
Dubravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
Characteristics of Stocks Levered to Housinp: in this section of the report, we compare the financial metrics of
housing stocks to S&P 1500. Generally, stocks levered to housing have higher growth with riskier attributes:
•
Similar valuation but stronger expected growth: on average housing stocks trade at a similar EV/EBITDA and PIE
(NTM) multiples but have a higher growth profile on average. Housing companies have significantly higher sales and
EPS growth of +6.8% and +18% (vs. +1.5% and +11% for S&P 1500).
Figure 58:
Median for Housing
•Hwang
VALUATION: EVIEBITDA and PIE
Figure
S8P 1500
Median
otusii
59: GROWTH: Sales and Earnings Growth
vs S&P 1500
171%
Stocks vs
=S4P1500
for Housing Stocks
INF 1510
14.0
25.0
7.0%
180%
12.7
180%
121
CA%
101
1 8.4
W1
200
14.0%
10.0
5.0%-
102%
121%
15.0
to
4.0% -
10.0%
to
lb%
BD%
10.0
8014
4.0
20%
1.51
51
40%
2.0
1.0%
2D%
0.0
OD
0.0%
OD%
WW81191141.711)
P.E ATI(
Win treat VA
WS Wow& tyti)
Scurce: J.P. !organ ad Factaet
•
Size: similar in market-cap though smaller in profits. Housing stocks are similar in size to S&P 1500 names ($3.9b
median market cap vs. 54.26 median market cap for S&P 1500) but generate lower net income ($87m vs. $135m).
•
Leverage: higher financial leverage with a median total debt to equity ratio of 0.72x vs. 0.54x for S&P 1500 and lower
interest coverage ratio of 5.9x vs. 9.0x.
Figure 60: SIZE: Market Cap and Net Income
Median for Housing Stocks vs S&P 1500
Wiwsiv
54.5
34.0
$8.5
510
325
310
31.5
31.0
3115
50.0
lkirtat Cap (18)
Pin Income (48)
SSP 1500
54.16
53.87
•
5155 1
Figure 61: LEVERAGE: Debt/Equity and Int Coverage
Median lor Housing Stocks vs S&P 1500
NH:wing
- SSP 1500
5160
0.90
20.0
5140
0.80
6.72
18.0
5120
0.70
18.0
018
SIOD
0.34
141
121
0.50
SW
en
10.0
0.00
SW
to
0.30
51
to
340
020
to
$20
0.10
2.0
so
ooe
0.0
Taal Dtk4 to Equity
Interest Cower Ride
20
EFTA01071308
Duhravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
•
Liquidity: similar cash balance but cash flow yield lower. Housing companies on average hold 7.4% cash as % of
market (similar to S&P 1500 companies) and a generate lower cash flow as % of market cap (2.8% vs. 4.4%).
•
Cash usage: lower capex requirement and lower dividend yield. Housing companies have a lower capex requirement
at 1.8% of sales compared to S&P 1500 at 3.2%. Dividend yield on average is also lower at 1.4% vs 2.0%, for S&P
1500.
Figure
Median
• Hasic
12.0%
10.0%
62: LIQUIDITY: Cash and Cash Flow
1500
Figure
Median
•
9.0%
4.5%
U%
4.0%.
63: CASH USAGE: Capex and Dividends
1500
3.0%
25%
for Housing Stocks vs S&P
• SIP 1500
for Housing Stocks vs S&P
Hawing
• SIP 15D)
7.0%
3.5%
3.2%
117%
10%
7.4%
7A%
6.0%
3.0%
20%
10%
44%
51%
25%
143%
IS%
4.0%
20% -
11%
4.0%
it%
10%
15% -
1.0%
20%
1.0% .
2.0%
05%
1.0%
05%.
01%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Cash as % an111Cap
as % al Mit Cap
Capes as% a/Seas
Ohldead Yield
•
Surprisingly, higher return on investment and similar volatility. Housing stocks generate stronger return on
investment (on both ROA and ROE) than S&P 1500 companies. More surprisingly, however, the risk profile is similar
as measured by both beta and annualized volatility for an average housing stock vs. S&P 1500.
Figure 64: PROFITABILITY: ROA and ROE
Median for Housing Stocks vs S&P 1500
Otaske
.W1500
7.0%
10%
5.0%
10%
30%
20%
ID%
OA%
WA
13%
ni
Figure 65: RISK: Beta and Volatility
Median for Housing Stocks vs S&P 1500
20.0%
12
1.0
15.0%
•Hateirq
• UP 1500
0.87
0.99
212%
24.6%
300%
250%
121%
as
200%
10.0%
01
150%
OA
100%
5.0%
02
0
00
Nal
50%
00%
0.06
Bala
Source J.P. Morgan at Factsei
Annualised Volatility
21
EFTA01071309
Dubravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
•
Sentiment: on average, housing names have higher short interest as compared to the rest of the market and the Street is
less constructive on the target price upside — the median consensus target price upside is 10% compared to 12% for the
rest of the market.
Figure 66: SENTIMENT: Short Interest as % of Total Float, Days Short
Median for Housing Stocks vs S&P 1500
401i:using
SOP 150)
10%
9%
8%
7%
6%
5%
0%
3%
2%
1%
0%
48%
2.5%
Short Newt
Figure 67: SENTIMENT: Average Analyst Stock Rating, Consensus
Target Price as % of Current Price
Median for Housing Stocks vs SW 1500. 1 = Strong Buy. 4 = Underperlorm
10
• Housieg
SOP 1500
9
10
20%
a
18%
2.5
- 7
16%
4,1
6
2.0
5
1.54
159
10.0\
111%
14%
12%
1.5
10%
3
8%
1.0
2
6%
0.5
4%
0
2%
SNP
Days
0.0
0%
Avenge Rating
Upside
Shareholder yield near 5% for Housing Stocks. Perhaps due to the uneven growth and highly cyclical nature of most
companies levered to housing, the shareholder yield has been quite volatile over the last few years. Over the last twelve
months, the total shareholder yield increased to 4.7%, which is now higher than the S&P 500 at 4.1%.
•
As shown below, housing companies have been inconsistent with buybacks with net buyback yield in the range of -0.1
(2008) to 3.6% (2011) of market cap. However, the dividend payout has been more consistent and rising.
Figure 68: Corporate Activity (Share Issuance and Repurchases)
Housing Stocks
Housing Stocks
2033
260
3363
2011
2712
2013
2014
202014
302014
40314
Kam
202015
LTV
Nees Sloe* EuMatis
52,671
$1.785
57.985
$11.122
$12.778
NAN
$19.791
$5.434
$1783
$4.305
$5.337
$4.311
$19,778
Lest Eat, k19.0nOt
2.717
2061
1603
1.413
63W
11173
3035
828
793
374
EEO
373
2.202
NetBuybacks
446
4279
$2278
$9933
$6074
$3.015
$16986
149C6
$1,985
$3992
$1930
13..959
$17376
Nel &Ow% Weld
0.0%
41%
18%
106
1.6%
7.6%
29%
19%
/.094
17%
0.1%
0.7%
11%
CaNDtexUnd Pad
$5391
UM
$5.771
$5.705
$6,841
$1431
$7,795
51265
$2099
$2101
$2.763
NI%
NCO
Tote Nei 8serbaces • D &side
$5548
$3.957
$1019
$15,338
$12915
$14.449
NINO
$6472
$7.054
25.993
57,393
93355
226,625
Yew Shareholder Yield
13%
1.8%
10%
11%
14%
20%
4.3%
1.3%
1.4%
1.1%
1.2%
1.1%
4.7%
Nel Wirt
45,522
$1,944
59.875
$12939
$16033
534190
$25.910
$7,925
$6802
$6.005
$5.576
$7.511
$26,025
%Mend Payed as % dNel hone
-101%
218%
55%
45%
41%
27%
30%
24%
31%
33%
49%
3%
35%
Buybacks ea % &Netlrctme
48%
974
80%
44%
77%
75%
76%
69%
85%
73%
93%
55%
76%
Taal Payout as % el Net Income
Can fon tun lkeraso•s
$15915
216988
$20.%3
$21.826
Se‘327
$35116
$40.037
$11,240
$10320
$9425
%
$108%
$40,017
ess CaPeA
$10,639
$6.202
56533
$8.253
51191
$1401
$10.455
$22.X0
$2459
$3327
51.240
$2415
$11644
Actisid CFO
$5,276
$10746
$14415
$13,572
5181E
saris
$29333
$8,937
$7.920
$5893
57.9.6
5349?
$29,373
Total Payout n cti ol Cash Flow
106%
37%
93%
113%
71%
58%
83%
72%
N%
152%
104%
73%
91%
&Lae. J.P./Accgan aid Facaet
22
EFTA01071310
Dubravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
Valuation: housing stocks trade richer on trailing multiples but at a discount on forward and book multiples
•
Based on median PIE (LTNI), housing stocks trade at a premium to S&P 1500 but trade at a discount on forward
next twelve months multiple. Based on forward multiples, housing stocks trade at more than Ix discount compared to
the market. As historical and forward multiples converge, this could be a source of upside for housing stocks.
Figure 69: Price to Earnings (LTM)
Median
30.04
24.1.
na.
—
HousiloCompzele
Mesh° Carocele average
-
SIP 1500
SIP 151:0 mop
'CO 91 92 '03 Si 05 t6 '07 tl0 90 10 11 12 '13 14 15
Source J.P. Morgan. FacCet
Figure 70: Price to Earnings (NTM)
Median
25.04
20.04
15.04
lot
Sat
1.0 DI
D2 93 Ds
Source J.P. Morgan. FactSel
VS 95 '07
VB
130 10 11 12 '13 14 'Is
• Housing stocks on EV/EBITDA (LTM) trade at a premium: Due to significantly higher expected growth, housing
stocks on EV/EBITDA trade at a premium to S&P 1500 companies.
•
On a book value basis, housing stocks trade at a discount to the market but inline with its 15y r average.
Figure 71: EV/EBITDA
Median
15.0a
10.04
tat
0.04
'CO
131 92 '03 bi DS
116
'07
'OS
11,3 10 11
2 13 14 15
Source J.P. Morgan. FacrSet
—
Hating Congo&
Hating Canes& tarp,
—
SIP 1530
SIP 1500 atop
Figure 72: Price to Book
Median
sac
MIA
4.04
am
104
1.04
0.04
TO VI 22 CS SA
VS 05 '07 00
139 10 '11 12 13 14 15
Source J.P. Megan. FactSel 1
-
Wang Co-posse
Housing Co-9crste average
-
SIP 1500
S&P MOO Image
14,
2 la
23
EFTA01071311
Dubravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
J.P. Morgan US Housing Basket — JPAMHOUS <Index>
Housing market fundamentals remain constructive with a pick-up in demand, tightening supply, high affordability, low
household leverage, and easing credit standards. After more than six years into this recovery, we believe there are few
opportunities that offer stronger growth and cheaper valuation than housing, and recommend investors overweight stocks
and industries that are exposed to it. The J.P. Morgan US Housing Basket is composed of a diversified portfolio of
companies that have direct or indirect exposure to the US housing market and should benefit from the continued
pick-up in residential investment. Basket constituents are screened for liquidity (trade at least $10M ADV), and include
direct beneficiaries of housing (e.g., Homebuilders, Building Products) as well as derivative industry plays (e.g., Durables,
Retail, Financials). The basket contains 65 names, and the weights are optimized to replicate as closely as possible an equal-
weighted basket, subject to a maximum of 10% of ADV traded in any single name within a $100M basket. The basket can
be accessed on Bloomberg via ticker JPAMHOUS <Index>.
Figure 73: Composition of the J.P. Morgan US Housing Basket — JPAMHOUS <Index>. as of Aug 12th 2015
.
120%
13 39
3fn
s
a,T
:tav
us
3r
4113
MX
MZRAIR 9040% Ono'.
IAN
410
591
9
40
41%
.274%
III
if
24%
in
14.0P.R0:444.11€
Cre• oh
19%
00
6.17
*
14%
42%
4 It
114
7.1
34%
101
901131.1.0CLIA
Ono*
ISM
NM
397
16
11%
IT
313%
III
Si
43%
5
90399 MIS
94.0.4
19%
231, 7
21.40
%
.00
41%
11)%
Its
121
34%
Wd
6.4/ IA 03
94404
19%
EEO
6.161
)2
.43.4
43%
44%
111
47
41%
4.11
Auks cat,
134401
ors
00
in
.20%
091
In
40
34%
OP
1404.6.102011).$
000310 Wan
19%
110
4314
*
74%
40%
IIS
40
29.
v9I
101110/4142770
C0140019419411
19%
0211
1195
127
al%
SO%
10%
212
27
in
AV
PV47091691C
Cearalentlilm/4
123%
as
in
a
141%
la
831%
174
143
341
A
804210139140
69014011 9099
19%
1139
210
X
41%
.13%
2:22%
III
bi
494
MC
40.119.9.6X93
14014•6046.44
151%
Ma
in
is
an
44%
It I%
143
23
14%
IC
40111.930490314 94:2180305
131%
4315
7m
9
1.2%
112%
711%
III
14
241
09
.14/40004P
eageows
19%
2919
014)
114
04%
174%
411%
09
611
In
J
aniac art 130
ton neon
is%
1320
WI
0
04%
ma
04%
III
MA
32%
413
Aut.comc
tun" Infra
1313
5107
IMO
*
491
22%
343%
163
ill%
334
as
0199, 12 0 0.818
(40101004
19%
6119
013
9
4.11
0%
HS%
III
43
294
L
Leccav
00•61•54s
151%
MO
410
0
17.4%
WM
lit%
162
4I
32%
X
04414 00400
Emery 01004
19%
402
4.119
71
In
*It
141%
III
74
43%
M74
C4410909 109 901 *an
19%
ft*
I34)
21
434%
424%
13%
02
Si
46%
st4
nanwn4 saix 14441%orm
irk
2734
In
a
on
In
ris
no
43
33%
:001
1401.10 7.1106
94014”404
112%
OS
1512
4
4%
.35%
91%
219
30
In
Tat
ma co as
0.1010•14S
IR%
7112
1224
DI
410
I1D%
as
0
43%
sat
non
neva
run nen.
1174100
in
us
in
•
10%
ma
nu%
Ho
133
124
•••
100104124247
la%
7439
404
a
40%
.1•1
114
55
501
11407•47
3
CIOZOLIC
130
027
4112
a
50
42%
us
II
3%
INS
sway Ina s
Venn
130
10400
1601
IN
ANL
In.
244%
us
so
32%
MO
MOICO WC
f12990954%142 CMS*
19%
0150
414)
27
44%
AI%
42)%
223
0
26%
1401
9ACCI%1109905
1910744.09441110159
ors
397
074
2i
112%
K2%
241%
213
s i
334
14
0190 070.100
0•30100010.
19%
4410
UM
24
40
7%
2151
MI
11
4518
Si
LEW* 0994
1.60444$9010
19%
II a
10.10
01 49.1
*VI
411%
III
21
4094
Tft
rataunitts
ininisomen
in
3443
5937
II
oat
in
711%
145
II
41%
391
11,“(0604.014C
Itmes$ Patin
19%
210
7.199
III
Ori
7%
115%
III
16
In
V.I.
1/4...19011106
1.6006$9011.5
19%
M30
1519
in
64.1
13%
65114,
175
1)
in
139
Stlatale Ha C
119•0003,9144
130
40
3434
9
.01
52%
123%
116
IA
Vte
EC KI.06415IC
/0106$90193
19%
2952
10)
13
41%
744
11141
III
12
44%
94
LAMM% NC
ilbsPal104.6144
13T1.
9/6
Ka
NI ST
an
453%
III
20
51%
494
01409
rbanif Den.
IAN
ISM
1434
41
411
11%
44%
03
II
494
601114“ <41(SC
1404441,C,ntin
IR%
420
1511
a
0.8%
.I2%
041
110
IA
274
rim
re PONT4 CROLP
Peon, 0.4084
IAN
140
239
9
.45%
18%
III%
II
IA
431
IMIIIC
0000:1000.4
IAN
14115
110
•
591
III%
MI%
140
48
33%
MA
/640.60:1.9,0
Ann, 0,44.9
19%
0170
WM
1%
4%
41%
an
10
27
54%
40
1.11•4401417.477
(tare Cknrin
13T1.
4113
6133
0
40
311
448%
93
II
411
400t
10:7(017
(14441.1
19%
016
506
%47%
242%
111
It 7
31%
06 .
.629:
reeve I tab, Roar
In
610
UM
0
.1
414%
2%
261%
III
SII
341
.04
LOC/ C0.04
4.41 .414
13T1.
NW
6439
375
211
494
40%
In
44
en
0
0:44 :MT 9:
k4,46 h(44
19%
ION
152.91
444
4.%
01,
III%
115
111
44%
MA
/ALL4207:WA9
12.11•+14
13T1.
8512
730
0
3.4%
an
323%
a7
47
32%
90
8401101403,00
-4.11•+14
13T1.
6111
10133
4314
214
III
42
724
49
41804.4104 .00 94...0 199
19%
*0
1.10
*
lit
IN%
tilt
214
55
lit
044
4.4.40074
.44.41 1» 4
13T1.
Ins
2436
71
In
In
444%
us
2.4
31%
on
Rau ammo
1.0
13n.
est
4243
0
40
In
343%
172
II
34%
470
VW 44•0227
2205 04000 0 0
19%
1112
5526
%
4).
In
II"
III
10
42%
ow
won ncte SC
Ti,s 0.03430.944
in
um
ant
0
44%
52%
332%
us
IA
It%
10
MOIR 601.1909
11/1138110)008W0
016%
2402
14)
*
.11.0%
52%
61"
III
70
43%
0•41
(0009.9 1010 Pawn
19%
527
WI
41
404%
35.6%
493%
Ai
02
II%
In
I 407 4249x0 I
Imam
IR%
4126
430
a
30
an
5194
142
II
La
WI
0.0 41.13.1011.
V.sone
19%
1110
Oa
21 In
II%
214%
97
LI
.12.4
CO
4.0n.OE WIWI
44/404
IP%
110
656
II
4230
.51%
UM
61
2)
Ma
0
htYCPWC.C57103 Pat bes.I.44ret 11n
INN
340
A=
.32%
43%
III
18
411
Kt
47.10 00.1)454
144 (1.40.09•ITIA14
19%
406
7.09
3
16%
44%
In
II)
47
In
.04
AMMON x:403 A
At4 000.00504.43
19%
1516
110
21
42%
.51%
at
70
4.1%
*IV
13/497/r4419.43
Pa. 104 V /PM
A DNS
IAN
AIM
63:11
0
.5111
42%
In
716
28
33%
iLtC1/40J1.14.
7•04:000424.04
IR%
740
701
.2704
CS%
611
IA
43%
M.)
4244 AOC X*
£41.0
10%
Mt
2)OT
V.
4%
151.
611%
III
7(I
474
10200111 110110•40494
0%
01
414%
143
/I
in
Ml
$4511019146
591
4,1%
111%
III
25
1%
that w not covered by J.P. Morgan Research and should not be ‘ievfed as a recommendation wet reseed to Mese °movies.
24
EFTA01071312
Duhravko Lalcos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
Basket Performance
In this section, we examine the hypothetical performance of the J.P. Morgan US Housing Basket over the last three years'.
The basket — JPAMHOUS <Index> — would have returned +18% on an annualized basis, narrowly outperforming the S&P
Homebuilders Select Industry Index (SPSIHOTR Index), which returned +17.7% over the same period. The correlation of
the basket to the SPSIHOTR Index is 93%, and the recent 6M realized volatility of the basket is 12.5% (the realized
volatility of the SPSIHOTR Index over the same time frame is 1.5 vol points higher at 14.1%). The figures below show the
performance and volatility of the J.P. Morgan US Housing Basket vs. that of the SPSIHOTR Index. The historical beta and
correlation between them is also shown in the charts below.
Figure 74: Hypothetical performance of JPAMHOUS and SPSIHOTR
Figure 75: Daily Returns of JPAMHOUS vs. SPSIHOTR
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
An.12 Dec-I2 AprI3 Aug-13 Devil Ape-I4 Aug-I4 Doc-I4 App41 MOS
-JPAMHOUS -SPSIHOTR
.
Deanne& Strategy. Bloomberg. Note: Al price perfonnance
excludes oximnissmns and fees. Past perkrmance is not indanve of fuse returns
10%
8%
4:4:.
6%
Ole
R3 = 89%
2%
CC
0%
&I
6. -2%
-4%
A -6%
-8%
-10%
-8 /6
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
S&P Honiebullders Select Industry Index Daily Return (%)
es:axles comrrissiors and fees. Past rerformanee is not indtratina of future returns
Figure 76: 6M Realized Volatility of JPAMHOUS vs. SPSIHOTR
Figure 77: 6M Beta and 6M Correlation of JPAMHOUS vs. SPSIHOTR
26%
24%
22%
20%
18%
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
Dec-13
Apr-14
Aug-14
Dec-14
Apr-15
Aug-13
—JPAMHOUS 6M Realized Vol.
—SPSIHOTR 6N1 Realized Vol.
Aug-15
100%
1.0
0
0
0
20%
••• ••••••••••11.4
—6M Corral. With SPSIHOTR(Left)
—6M Beta vs. SPSIHOTR(Right)
0.9
0.8
0.7
0%
0.6
Aug-I3 Dec-13
Apr-14 Aug-14
Dec-14
Apr-15 Aug-I5
Soiree: J.P. Morgan Equity Derivatives Strategy Sheinberg. Note: NI pm* performance
exci.des CCOIMISSICOS and Less. Past performance is not indicative of fubse felons
eaduciasoommissions and fees Past performance is not inclusive of fosse returns
Not all stocks in the basket have 3 years of price history (BCC, ALLE, TPH, RH, HRTG, AMH, and RLGY). In such cases, we have
replaced the stock with an equivalent quantity of cash prior to its listing for the purpose of the back-test.
25
EFTA01071313
Dubravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
Additional Basket Methodology Information
In order to keep the basket relevant to the investment theme, J.P. Morgan reserves the right to review the following at any
time:
•
Basket methodology. This is to ensure the rules of the basket remain relevant following any structural changes to
the theme. This may include ensuring that the sector exposure of the basket remains broadly consistent with the
investment theme.
•
Basket change implementation. J.P. Morgan will consider extending the implementation of changes to the basket
composition from one trading session to any period up to five trading sessions in the event that a material increase
in the liquidity or capacity of the basket is required to minimize market impact.
Corporate actions may affect the JPAMHOUS basket. The composition of a custom basket is typically adjusted in the
following manner:
•
Cash Merger. The divisor is adjusted and we remove the merging company from the basket on the day of merger
and redistribute gains into remaining companies according to recalculated market cap weights of surviving
constituents in the basket.
•
Stock Merger. If the acquirer is a member of the basket, then the weight allocated to the acquired will transfer to
the surviving entity on the close of the last day it trades. If the acquirer is not a part of the basket, then proceeds
(losses) from the acquired company will be redistributed to the surviving basket constituents based on the
recalculated weighting on the close of its last trading day.
•
Spinoffs. The spinoff company and parent will be included in the basket and both the spinoff and parent company
weights will be readjusted according to new market capitalizations after the spinoff date.
•
Tender Offers & Share Buybacks. The company remains in the basket and its weight is adjusted according to the
impact the tender/buyback has on the stock's market value.
•
Delistingfinsolvency/Bankruptcy. The company is removed from the basket as of the close of the last trading day,
and the proceeds (losses) will be redistributed into remaining companies according to re-calculated weights of
remaining companies in the basket. If a stock trades on "pink sheets" it will not be included in the basket.
26
EFTA01071314
Oubravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
dubravko.lakos-bujas©jpmorgan.com
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
Appendix I: Price Decline Housing vs Tech
Figure 78: Tracking the Recovery in Housing Stocks
Index to 100 at peak
120
100
80
60
40
0
-5
Bubble Peak
Housing Composite
Morran
NASDAQ 1CC
Peak-to-trough
Housing Composite
-89%
NASDAQ 100
-78%
0
years after peak
ID
15
27
EFTA01071315
Dubravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Disclosures
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
This report is a product of the research department's Global Equity Derivatives and Quantitative Strategy group. Views expressed may
differ from the views of the research analysts covering stocks or sectors mentioned in this report. Structured securities, options, futures
and other derivatives are complex instruments, may involve a high degree of risk, and may be appropriate investments only for
sophisticated investors who are capable of understanding and assuming the risks involved. Because of the importance of tax
considerations to many option transactions, the investor considering options should consult with his/her tax advisor as to how taxes affect
the outcome of contemplated option transactions.
Analyst Certification: The research analyst(s) denoted by an "AC" on the cover of this report certifies (or, where multiple research
analysts are primarily responsible for this report, the research analyst denoted by an "AC' on the cover or within the document
individually certifies, with respect to each security or issuer that the research analyst covers in this research) that (I) all of the views
expressed in this report accurately reflect his or her personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers; and (2) no part of
any of the research analyst's compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views
expressed by the research analyst(s) in this report. For all Korea-based research analysts listed on the front cover, they also certify, as per
KOFIA requirements, that their analysis was made in good faith and that the views reflect their own opinion, without undue influence or
intervention.
Important Disclosures
• Analyst Position: The following analysts (and/or their associates or household members) own a long position in the shares of MGIC
Investment Corporation: Dubravko Lakos-Bujas.
• Client: J.P. Morgan currently has, or had within the past 12 months, the following company(ies) as clients: MGIC Investment
Corporation.
Company-Specific Disclosures: Important disclosures, including price charts and credit opinion history tables, are available for
compendium reports and all J.P. Morgan-covered companies by visiting huns://remm.conVresearchidisclosures, calling 1-800477-0406,
or e-mailing research.disclosure.inquiriesOipmorgan.com with your request. J.P. Morgan's Strategy, Technical, and Quantitative
Research teams may screen companies not covered by J.P. Morgan. For important disclosures for these companies, please call 1.800477-
0406 or e-mail research.disclosure.inauiries,,itinmorgan.com.
Explanation of Equity Research Ratings, Designations and Analyst(s) Coverage Universe:
J.P. Morgan uses the following rating system: Overweight (Over the next six to twelve months, we expect this stock will outperform the
average total return of the stocks in the analyst's (or the analyst's team's) coverage universe.] Neutral [Over the next six to twelve
months, we expect this stock will perform in line with the average total return of the stocks in the analyst's (or the analyst's team's)
coverage universe.] Underweight [Over the next six to twelve months, we expect this stock will underperfonn the average total return of
the stocks in the analyst's (or the analyst's team's) coverage universe.] Not Rated (NR): J.P. Morgan has removed the rating and, if
applicable, the price target, for this stock because of either a lack of a sufficient fundamental basis or for legal, regulatory or policy
reasons. The previous rating and, if applicable, the price target, no longer should be relied upon. An NR designation is not a
recommendation or a rating. In our Asia (ex-Australia) and U.K. small- and mid-cap equity research, each stock's expected total return is
compared to the expected total return of a benchmark country market index, not to those analysts' coverage universe. If it does not appear
in the Important Disclosures section of this report, the certifying analyst's coverage universe can be found on J.P. Morgan's research
website, www.jpmorganmarkets.com.
J.P. Morgan Equity Research Ratings Distribution, as of June 30, 2015
Overweight Neutral
(buy)
(hold)
Underweight
(sell)
J.P. Morgan Global Equity Research Coverage
44%
43%
13%
IB clients.,
51%
48%
38%
JPMS Equity Research Coverage
45%
47%
9%
IB clients.,
71%
66%
57%
•Percentage of investment banking clients in each rating category.
For purposes only of FINRA/NYSE ratings distribution rules, our Overweight rating falls into a buy rating category: our Neutral rating falls into a hold
rating category; and our Underweight rating falls into a sell rating category. Please note that stocks with an NR designation arc not included in the table
above.
Equity Valuation and Risks: For valuation methodology and risks associated with covered companies or price targets for covered
companies, please see the most recent company-specific research report at hnre/Avviwipmorganmarkets.com contact the primary analyst
or your J.P. Morgan representative, or email research.disclosure.inquiriesOipmorgan.com.
28
EFTA01071316
Dubravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
Equity Analysts' Compensation: The equity research analysts responsible for the preparation of this report receive compensation based
upon various factors, including the quality and accuracy of research, client feedback, competitive factors, and overall firm revenues.
Other Disclosures
J.P. Morgan ("JPM") is the global brand name for J.P. Morgan Securities LLC ("JPMS") and its affiliates worldwide. J.P. Morgan Cazenove is a marketing
name for the U.K. investment banking businesses and EMEA cash equities and equity research businesses of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries.
All research reports made available to clients arc simultaneously available on our client website, J.P. Morgan Markets. Not all research content is
redistributed, c-mailed or made available to third-party aggregators. For all research reports available on a particular stock, please contact your sales
representative.
Options related research: If the information contained herein regards options related research, such information is available only to persons who have
received the proper option risk disclosure documents. For a copy of the Option Clearing Corporation's Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options.
please contact your J.P. Morgan Representative or visit the OCC's website at http://www.option.sclearing.com/publicationstrisks/riskstoc.pdf
Legal Entities Disclosures
U.S.: JPMS is a member of NYSE, FINRA, SIPC and the NFA. JPMorgan Chase Bank.. N.A. is a member of FDIC. U.K.: JPMorgan Chase N.A., London
Branch. is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and is subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and to limited regulation by
the Prudential Regulation Authority. Details about the extent of our regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority arc available from J.P. Morgan on
request. J.P. Morgan Securities plc (JPMS plc) is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Registered in England & Wales No. 2711006. Registered Office 25
Bank Street, London, El4 SIP. South Africa: J.P. Morgan Equities South Africa Proprietary Limited is a member of the Johannesburg Securities
Exchange and is regulated by the Financial Services Board. Hong Kong: J.P. Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) Limited (CE number AAJ32 I ) is regulated
by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong and/or J.P. Morgan Broking (Hong Kong) Limited (CE
number AAB027) is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong. Korea: This material is issued and distributed in Korea by or
through J.P. Morgan Securities (Far East) Limited, Seoul Branch, which is a member of the Korea Exchange(KRX) and is regulated by the Financial
Services Commission (FSC) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS). Australia: J.P. Morgan Australia Limited (JPMAL) (ABN 52 002 888 011/AFS
Licence No: 238188) is regulated by ASIC and J.P. Morgan Securities Australia Limited (JPMSAL) (ABN 61 003 245 234/AFS Licence No: 238066) is
regulated by ASIC and is a Market. Clearing and Settlement Participant of ASX Limited and CHI-X. Taiwan: J.P.Morgan Securities (Taiwan) Limited is a
participant of the Taiwan Stock Exchange (company-type) and regulated by the Taiwan Securities and Futures Bureau. India: J.P. Morgan India Private
Limited (Corporate Identity Number - U67120MH1992FTC068724). having its registered office at J.P. Morgan Tower, Ott C.S.T. Road, Kahn's
Santacruz - East, Mumbai - 400098, is a member of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (SEBI Registration Number - INB 230675231/INF
230675231/INE 230675231) and Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (SEBI Registration Number - INB 010675237/INF 010675237) and is regulated by
Securities and Exchange Board of India. Telephone: 91-22-6157 3000, Facsimile: 91-22-6157 3990 and Website: www.ipmiptcom. For non local research
reports, this material is not distributed in India by J.P. Morgan India Private Limited. Thailand: This material is issued and distributed in Thailand by
JPMorgan Securities (Thailand) Ltd.. which is a member of the Stock Exchange of Thailand and is regulated by the Ministry of Finance and the Securities
and Exchange Commission and its registered address is 3rd Floor, 20 North Sathom Road, Si lom, Bangrak. Bangkok 10500. Indonesia: PT J.P. Morgan
Securities Indonesia is a member of the Indonesia Stock Exchange and is regulated by the OJK a.k.a. BAPEPAM LK. Philippines: J.P. Morgan Securities
Philippines Inc. is a Trading Participant of the Philippine Stock Exchange and a member of the Securities Clearing Corporation of the Philippines and the
Securities Investor Protection Fund. It is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Brazil: Banco J.P. Morgan S.A. is regulated by the
Comissao de Valores Mobil iarios (CV M) and by the Central Bank of Brazil. Mexico: J.P. Morgan Casa de Boise. S.A. de C.V., J.P. Morgan Grupo
Financicro is a member of the Mexican Stock Exchange and authorized to act as a broker dealer by the National Banking and Securities Exchange
Commission. Singapore: This material is issued and distributed in Singapore by or through J.P. Morgan Securities Singapore Private Limited (JPMSS)
[MCI (P) 100/03/2015 and Co. Reg. No.: 199405335R] which is a member of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited and is regulated by the
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and/or JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Singapore branch (JPMCB Singapore) which is regulated by the MAS. This
material is provided in Singapore only to accredited investors, expert investors and institutional investors, as defined in Section 4A of the Securities and
Futures Act, Cap. 289. Recipients of this document are to contact JPMSS or JPMCB Singapore in respect of any matters arising front, or in connection
with, the document. Japan: JPMorgan Securities Japan Co., Ltd. is regulated by the Financial Services Agency in Japan. Malaysia: This material is issued
and distributed in Malaysia by JPMorgan Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (18146-X) which is a Participating Organization of Bursa Malaysia Bcrhad and a
holder of Capital Markets Services License issued by the Securities Commission in Malaysia. Pakistan: J. P. Morgan Pakistan Broking (Pvt.) Ltd is a
member of the Karachi Stock Exchange and regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan. Saudi Arabia: J.P. Morgan Saudi Arabia
Ltd. is authorized by the Capital Market Authority of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (CMA) to carry out dealing as an agent. arranging. advising and
custody, with respect to securities business under licence number 35-07079 and its registered address is at 8th Floor. Al-Faisaliyah Tower. King Fahad
Road. P.O. Box 51907, Riyadh 11553, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Dubai: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Dubai Branch is regulated by the Dubai Financial
Services Authority (DFSA) and its registered address is Dubai International Financial Centre - Building 3. Level 7, PO Box 506551, Dubai. UAE.
Country and Region Specific Disclosures
U.K. and European Economic Area (EEA): Unless specified to the contrary, issued and approved for distribution in the U.K. and the EEA by JPMS plc.
Investment research issued by JPMS plc has been prepared in accordance with JPMS plc's policies for managing conflicts of interest arising as a result of
publication and distribution of investment research. Many European regulators require a firm to establish, implement and maintain such a policy. This
report has been issued in the U.K. only to persons of a kind described in Article 19 (5), 38, 47 and 49 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000
(Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (all such persons being referred to as "relevant persons"). This document must not be acted on or relied on by persons
who arc not relevant persons. Any investment or investment activity to which this document relates is only available to relevant persons and will be
engaged in only with relevant persons. In other EEA countries, the report has been issued to persons regarded as professional investors (or equivalent) in
their home jurisdiction. Australia: This material is issued and distributed by JPMSAL in Australia to "wholesale clients" only. This material does not take
into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of the recipient. The recipient of this material must not distribute it to
29
EFTA01071317
Duhravko Lakos-Bujas
(1-212) 622-3601
[email protected]
Global Equity Strategy and Quantitative Research
13 August 2015
J.P.Morgan
any third party or outside Australia without the prior written consent of JPMSAL. For the purposes of this paragraph the term "wholesale client" has the
meaning given in section 76ICi of the Corporations Act 2001. Germany: This material is distributed in Germany by J.P. Morgan Securities plc, Frankfurt
Branch and J.P.Morgan Chase Bank. N.A., Frankfurt Branch which arc regulated by the Bundesanstalt fist Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht. Hong Kong: The
1% ownership disclosure as of the previous month end satisfies the requirements under Paragraph 16.5(a) of the Hong Kong Code of Conduct for Persons
Licensed by or Registered with the Securities and Futures Commission. (For research published within the first ten days of the month, the disclosure may
be based on the month end data from two months prior.) J.P. Morgan Broking (Hong Kong) Limited is the liquidity provider/market maker for derivative
warrants, callable bull bear contracts and stock options listed on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited. An updated list can be found on HKEx
website: http://wvAv.hkex.com.hk. Japan: There is a risk that a loss may occur due to a change in the price of the shares in the case of share trading, and
that a loss may occur due to the exchange rate in the case of foreign share trading. In the case of share trading. JPMorgan Securities Japan Co., Ltd., will be
receiving a brokerage fee and consumption tax (shouhizei) calculated by multiplying the executed price by the commission rate which was individually
agreed between JPMorgan Securities Japan Co.. Ltd.. and the customer in advance. Financial Instruments Firms: JPMorgan Securities Japan Co.. Ltd.,
Kanto Local Finance Bureau (kinsho) No. 82 Participating Association / Japan Securities Dealers Association. The Financial Futures Association of Japan,
Type lI Financial Instruments Finns Association and Japan Investment Advisers Association. Korea: This report may have been edited or contributed to
from time to time by affiliates of J.P. Morgan Securities (Far East) Limited. Seoul Branch. Singapore: JPMSS andkir its affiliates may have a holding in
any of the securities discussed in this report; for securities where the holding is I% or greater. the specific holding is disclosed in the Important Disclosures
section above. Taiwan: This material is issued and distributed in Taiwan by J.P. Morgan Securities (Taiwan) Limited. India: For private circulation only,
not for sale. Pakistan: For private circulation only, not for sale. New Zealand: This material is issued and distributed by JPMSAL in New Zealand only to
persons whose principal business is the investment of money or who, in the course of and for the purposes of their business, habitually invest money.
JPMSAL does not issue or distribute this material to members of "the public' as determined in accordance with section 3 of the Securities Act 1978. The
recipient of this material must not distribute it to any third party or outside New Zealand without the prior written consent of JPMSAL. Canada: The
information contained herein is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, a prospectus. an advertisement, a public offering, an offer to sell
securities described herein, or solicitation of an offer to buy securities described herein, in Canada or any province or territory thereof. Any offer or sale of
the securities described herein in Canada will be made only under an exemption from the requirements to file a prospectus with the relevant Canadian
securities regulators and only by a dealer properly registered under applicable securities laws or. alternatively, pursuant to an exemption from the dealer
registration requirement in the relevant province or territory of Canada in which such offer or sale is made. The information contained herein is under no
circumstances to be construed as investment advice in any province or territory of Canada and is not tailored to the needs of the recipient. To the extent that
the information contained herein references securities of an issuer incorporated, formed or created under the laws of Canada or a province or territory of
Canada, any trades in such securities must be conducted through a dealer registered in Canada. No securities commission or similar regulatory authority in
Canada has reviewed or in any way passed judgment upon these materials, the information contained herein or the merits of the securities described herein,
and any representation to the contrary is an offence. Dubai: This report has becn issued to persons regarded as professional clients as defined under the
DFSA rules. Brazil: Ombudsman J.P. Morgan: 0800-7700847 / ouvidoriajp.morgan(ajpmorgan.com.
General: Additional information is available upon request. Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but JPMorgan Chase & Co.
or its affiliates andlor subsidiaries (collectively J.P. Morgan) do not warrant its completeness or accuracy except with respect to any disclosures relative to
JPMS andlor its affiliates and the analyst's involvement with the issuer that is the subject of the research. All pricing is as of the close of market for the
securities discussed. unless otherwise stated. Opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change
without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any
financial instrument. The opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual client circumstances, objectives, or needs and arc not
intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies to particular clients. The recipient of this report must make its own
independent decisions regarding any securities or financial instruments mentioned herein. JPMS distributes in the U.S. research published by non-U.S.
affiliates and accepts responsibility for its contents. Periodic updates may be provided on companiesrindustries based on company specific developments or
announcements, market conditions or any other publicly available information. Clients should contact analysts and execute transactions through a J.P.
Morgan subsidiary or affiliate in their home jurisdiction unless goveming law permits otherwise.
"Other Disclosures' last revised July 14. 2015.
Copyright 2015 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved. This report or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold or
redistributed without the written consent ofJ.P. Morgan.
30
EFTA01071318
Technical Artifacts (84)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Domain
ajpmorgan.comDomain
avviwipmorganmarkets.comDomain
dubravko.lakos-hujasqpmorgan.comDomain
itinmorgan.comDomain
research.disclosure.inquiriesoipmorgan.comDomain
scott.a.linstonegnmorgan.comDomain
wvav.hkex.comDomain
www.jpmorganmarkets.comEmail
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Phone
1 2171140Phone
1-212) 622-3601Phone
1-212) 622-8030Phone
1-212) 622-9970Phone
1-212)622-3601Phone
1-800477-0406Phone
12131415Phone
12181115Phone
1274 1625Phone
12990954Phone
1308 2009Phone
1331 1234Phone
1435 5147Phone
15181718Phone
1804.4104Phone
1913 5152176Phone
212) 622-0087Phone
212)622-9812Phone
2141125Phone
2152341051Phone
2180305Phone
227
2205Phone
244 3134Phone
2711006Phone
294 1194Phone
305 2006Phone
305 2008Phone
309 2010Phone
317 5193Phone
368 5511Phone
405) 2015Phone
4124247Phone
4142770Phone
4314344Phone
4401417Phone
4410909Phone
4423012243Phone
443
5937Phone
4444444Phone
4563444Phone
482 5105Phone
513.446 5163Phone
520 5171Phone
601.1909Phone
644 1104Phone
646 1410Phone
715 1625Phone
789 3130Phone
800-7700847Phone
819 1011Phone
833 3513Phone
9014011Phone
910 1112Tail #
N111URL
http://wvAv.hkex.com.hkURL
http://www.option.sclearing.com/publicationstrisks/riskstoc.pdfWire Ref
referencesWire Ref
refinancingWire Ref
reflectingForum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.