Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta01081151DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 211 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 4

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
efta-efta01081151
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 211 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR SEVEN DAY ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO COMPLETE RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Motion for Seven Day Enlargement of Time to Complete Responses to Request for Production, and states: I. On June 19, 2013, the Court issued its Omnibus Order, directing the government to comply the petitioners' request for admissions and request for production within 30 days of the entry of the Order, or July 19, 2013. D.E. 190 at 2. 2. The government will be filing its responses to petitioners' request for admissions on July 19, 2013. Due to the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit's consideration of the intervenors' motion for stay, the government will not be producing correspondence and other communications between Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys and federal prosecutors. The government will be producing to petitioners the crime victims notifications sought in request for production no. 2. The government will also be producing correspondence and documents between the U.S. Attorney's Office and the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office and the local police 1 EFTA01081151 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 211 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 2 of 4 agencies, as well as other responsive items that are not privileged, or covered by the intervenors' motion for stay at the Eleventh Circuit. On July 19, 2013, the government will be submitting to the Court, for in camera inspection, approximately 14,000 pages of documents, and an accompanying Privilege Log, which is 24 pages in length. 3. The Office of the Deputy Attorney General has advised that it has requested files from its archives, to determine if they have any responsive documents to request for production no. 8. It expects to receive the archived files next week. 4. On the morning of July 19, 2013, the undersigned received responsive materials from the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). These are potentially responsive to request for production no. 17. These documents will have to be reviewed to determine if any privileges may apply. 5. Because of the number of potential sources of responsive material, and the need to review the material received, the government respectfully requests an enlargement of time of seven (7) days, up to and including July 26, 2013, to complete its response to the request for production. CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE On July 19, 2013, at approximately 11:49 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, the undersigned sent an e-mail to petitioners' counsel, Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards, requesting their position on this motion. As of the filing of this motion, no response has been received from the 2 EFTA01081152 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 211 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 3 of 4 petitioners' counsel. Respectfully submitted, WILFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/ Dexter A. Lee DEXTER A. LEE Int Assistant U.S. Attorney ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 19, 2013, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF, and served the attorneys on the attached Service List by U.S. Mail. s/ Dexter A. Lee DEXTER A. LEE Assistant U.S. Attorney SERVICE LIST Jane Does I and 2 v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer Jaffe Weissin Edwards Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 3 EFTA01081153 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 211 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 4 of 4 Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe # I and Jane Doe # 2 4 EFTA01081154

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY JAMES EDWARDS

19p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 212-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 23

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 212-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 23 PRIVILEGE LOQ Bates Range Description Privilege(s) Asserted Box #1 P-000001 thru P-000039 Box #1 P-000040 thru P-000549 File folder entitled "CORR RE GJ SUBPOENAS" containing correspondence related to various rand jury subpoenas and attorney handwritten notes 6(e) Work Product Operation Leap Year Grand Jury Log containing subpoenas OLY-01 through OLY-81, correspondence and research related to enforcement of same, documents produced in response to some subpoenas; and attorney ( ) handwritten notes 6(e) Work Product Contains documents subject to investigative privilege Also contains documents subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation Box #1 P-000550 thru P-000621 File folder entitled "Ritz Compact Flash SW" containing copies of a sealed search warrant application, warrant, and supporting documents 6(e) Contains information subjec

23p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

STATEMENT BY ALAN DERSHOWITZ

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 64

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE No. 1 and JANE DOE No. 2 v. UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 1. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I represent Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 (as referred to as "the victims") in the above-listed action to enforce their rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA). I also represented them (and several other victims) in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I am also familiar with the criminal justice system, having served as state prosecutor in the Broward County State Attorney's Office. 2. This affidavit covers factual issues regarding the Government's assertions of privilege to more tha

64p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.